Re: p0f v3

2012-03-18 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

 I'll give it a try.

I prepared a patch, see

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224

It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
hints on what's wrong.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: p0f v3

2012-03-18 Thread Mel Flynn
On 3/18/2012 18:01, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
 Hi!
 
 I'll give it a try.
 
 I prepared a patch, see
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224
 
 It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
 hints on what's wrong.
You replaced in Makefile:
PORTDOCS=   COPYING CREDITS ChangeLog KNOWN_BUGS README TODO
win-memleak.txt

With in pkg-plist:
share/doc/p0f/COPYING

The PORTDOCS variable respects NOPORTDOCS and does all the automatic
pkg-plist stuff.
If you want to do it in pkg-plist the line would be:
%%PORTDOCSDOCSDIR%%/COPYING

Details:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/install.html#INSTALL-DOCUMENTATION
-- 
Mel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: p0f v3

2012-03-18 Thread Chris Rees
On 18 Mar 2012 19:24, Mel Flynn rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:

 On 3/18/2012 18:01, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
  Hi!
 
  I'll give it a try.
 
  I prepared a patch, see
 
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224
 
  It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
  hints on what's wrong.
 You replaced in Makefile:
 PORTDOCS=   COPYING CREDITS ChangeLog KNOWN_BUGS README TODO
 win-memleak.txt

 With in pkg-plist:
 share/doc/p0f/COPYING

 The PORTDOCS variable respects NOPORTDOCS and does all the automatic
 pkg-plist stuff.
 If you want to do it in pkg-plist the line would be:
 %%PORTDOCSDOCSDIR%%/COPYING

 Details:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/install.html#INSTALL-DOCUMENTATION

In all honesty, PORTDOCS lines in pkg-plist are rarely necessary.  You're
nearly always better off with PORTDOCS= * in the Makefile.  Saves the size
of a ports checkout too :)

Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: p0f v3

2012-03-18 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224

  It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
  hints on what's wrong.
 You replaced in Makefile:
 PORTDOCS=   COPYING CREDITS ChangeLog KNOWN_BUGS README TODO
 win-memleak.txt
 
 With in pkg-plist:
 share/doc/p0f/COPYING
 
 The PORTDOCS variable respects NOPORTDOCS and does all the automatic
 pkg-plist stuff.

Ah, thanks!

I submitted a fixed pkg-plist to the PR.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: p0f v3

2012-03-18 Thread Wesley Shields
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 09:17:53PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
 Hi!
 
   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166224
 
   It still has an issue with the pkg-plist and I would appreciate
   hints on what's wrong.
  You replaced in Makefile:
  PORTDOCS=   COPYING CREDITS ChangeLog KNOWN_BUGS README TODO
  win-memleak.txt
  
  With in pkg-plist:
  share/doc/p0f/COPYING
  
  The PORTDOCS variable respects NOPORTDOCS and does all the automatic
  pkg-plist stuff.
 
 Ah, thanks!
 
 I submitted a fixed pkg-plist to the PR.

I just committed an update, which used your PR as a basis. I also took
maintainer of it but if you would like it please let me know.

Thanks for you work on this!

-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: p0f v3

2012-03-15 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

 Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at  
 detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get higher  
 than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were Windows XP,  
 which is causing spam filter accuracy issues.
 
 I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f port  
 does not have a maintainer.

As I've read your mail, I had a look at p0f 3. It looks doable.

I'll give it a try.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: p0f v3

2012-03-15 Thread Mark Felder

On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:28:31 -0500, Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote:


As I've read your mail, I had a look at p0f 3. It looks doable.


I've been busy and didn't have a chance to reply earlier -- I look forward  
to your work. I am preparing a test environment soon so I can push some  
emails through one of our filters with an updated p0f port. If I don't get  
to the port before you I would be able to at least test it.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


p0f v3

2012-03-14 Thread Mark Felder
Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at  
detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get higher  
than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were Windows XP,  
which is causing spam filter accuracy issues.


I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f port  
does not have a maintainer.



http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/



Cheers,



Mark
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: p0f v3

2012-03-14 Thread Michael Scheidell



On 3/14/12 1:46 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at 
detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get 
higher than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were 
Windows XP, which is causing spam filter accuracy issues.


I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f 
port does not have a maintainer.



http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/


Mark:
Thank you for your contributions to FreeBSD.  And, a second thank you 
from the maintainer of p5-Mail-SpamAssassin.


if you open a PR for an update to p0f, include in the txt of the pr (and 
in the Makefile), the necessary changes and take over maintainership.


I am sure everyone who uses this port in the future will thank you for 
your efforts.


--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org