Re: pkg-fallout mails
On 11/25/2015 2:33 AM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Fernando Apesteguía >wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 2015/11/18 07:04, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100090, Host: 1100085) !!! !!! This is not supported. !!! !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! !!! Expect build failures. !!! Can anyone please say if this is expected? Is anyone running tests/changing things in the ports building infrastructure? I could just ignore the mails, but I never received so many of these before. >>> >>> This warning appears on pretty much all pkg-fallout e-mails for HEAD. >>> It is a red-herring, and has nothing at all to do with why the e-mail is >>> being sent. It's just a warning: the host and jail versions are >>> sufficiently close there is no actual conflict between the system kernel >>> and the jail's userland even though that userland is more recent. >> >> Thanks for the explanation! I should probably tweak the message and logic a bit to be less scary and normal. It is mostly for people trying to build head packages from a 10 kernel which is easily not supported and usually results in obscure failures like 'why is rm or this other basic tool not working?'. Even on head these kinds of things have happened but it is very rare. The last was due to capsicum changes a few years ago. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: pkg-fallout mails
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Fernando Apesteguíawrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 2015/11/18 07:04, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: >>> !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100090, Host: 1100085) !!! >>> !!! This is not supported. !!! >>> !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! >>> !!! Expect build failures. !!! >>> >>> >>> Can anyone please say if this is expected? Is anyone running >>> tests/changing things in the ports building infrastructure? I could >>> just ignore the mails, but I never received so many of these before. >> >> This warning appears on pretty much all pkg-fallout e-mails for HEAD. >> It is a red-herring, and has nothing at all to do with why the e-mail is >> being sent. It's just a warning: the host and jail versions are >> sufficiently close there is no actual conflict between the system kernel >> and the jail's userland even though that userland is more recent. > > Thanks for the explanation! > >> >> The problem that is causing builds to fail in the pkg cluster will >> appear towards the *end* of the build log included in the e-mail. If >> you're getting these e-mails then the affected port is failing to build >> on at least one of the supported environments where it is expected to >> work. As port maintainer, you are meant to look into those build >> failures and preferably fix them; not just ignore the e-mails. If you >> don't understand why this port is failing to build, then there are any >> number of people here who will be happy to assist. > > I was just trying to understand why that port that hasn't been updated > in a while was suddenly failing to build... and well... the "Expect > build failures" was kind of an explanation :) > > I'll have a look at it as soon as I can. Is there any way to know when the last successful build was? The first one that failed was on 07-Nov-2015. I would like to cross check the changes in CURRENT to see if there were any clang/libc++ changes. I face the same problems trying to update cad/openvsp to 3.x. I get funny compilation error from clang that I don't fully understand. Thanks > > Cheers. > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> >> >> ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkg-fallout mails
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Matthew Seamanwrote: > On 2015/11/18 07:04, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: >> !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100090, Host: 1100085) !!! >> !!! This is not supported. !!! >> !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! >> !!! Expect build failures. !!! >> >> >> Can anyone please say if this is expected? Is anyone running >> tests/changing things in the ports building infrastructure? I could >> just ignore the mails, but I never received so many of these before. > > This warning appears on pretty much all pkg-fallout e-mails for HEAD. > It is a red-herring, and has nothing at all to do with why the e-mail is > being sent. It's just a warning: the host and jail versions are > sufficiently close there is no actual conflict between the system kernel > and the jail's userland even though that userland is more recent. Thanks for the explanation! > > The problem that is causing builds to fail in the pkg cluster will > appear towards the *end* of the build log included in the e-mail. If > you're getting these e-mails then the affected port is failing to build > on at least one of the supported environments where it is expected to > work. As port maintainer, you are meant to look into those build > failures and preferably fix them; not just ignore the e-mails. If you > don't understand why this port is failing to build, then there are any > number of people here who will be happy to assist. I was just trying to understand why that port that hasn't been updated in a while was suddenly failing to build... and well... the "Expect build failures" was kind of an explanation :) I'll have a look at it as soon as I can. Cheers. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkg-fallout mails
On 2015/11/18 07:04, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100090, Host: 1100085) !!! > !!! This is not supported. !!! > !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! > !!! Expect build failures. !!! > > > Can anyone please say if this is expected? Is anyone running > tests/changing things in the ports building infrastructure? I could > just ignore the mails, but I never received so many of these before. This warning appears on pretty much all pkg-fallout e-mails for HEAD. It is a red-herring, and has nothing at all to do with why the e-mail is being sent. It's just a warning: the host and jail versions are sufficiently close there is no actual conflict between the system kernel and the jail's userland even though that userland is more recent. The problem that is causing builds to fail in the pkg cluster will appear towards the *end* of the build log included in the e-mail. If you're getting these e-mails then the affected port is failing to build on at least one of the supported environments where it is expected to work. As port maintainer, you are meant to look into those build failures and preferably fix them; not just ignore the e-mails. If you don't understand why this port is failing to build, then there are any number of people here who will be happy to assist. Cheers, Matthew signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: pkg-fallout mails
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Fernando Apesteguía <fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Since the last week (aprox), I keep receiving pkg-fallout mails for > cad/openvsp, all of them with the following warning: > > !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100089, Host: 1100079) !!! > !!! This is not supported. !!! > !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! > !!! Expect build failures. !!! > > In the past, when I received one isolated mail, I just ignored it, but > I'm receiving them more often now. Something we can do about this? Another mail: You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix build. Maintainer: fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com Last committer: rak...@freebsd.org Ident: $FreeBSD: head/cad/openvsp/Makefile 395630 2015-08-30 17:41:23Z rakuco $ Log URL: http://beefy3.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-i386-default/p401796_s290807/logs/openvsp-2.3.0_4.log Build URL: http://beefy3.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=head-i386-default=p401796_s290807 Log: >> Building cad/openvsp build started at Wed Nov 18 06:46:05 UTC 2015 port directory: /usr/ports/cad/openvsp building for: FreeBSD head-i386-default-job-12 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r290807 i386 maintained by: fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: head/cad/openvsp/Makefile 395630 2015-08-30 17:41:23Z rakuco $ Poudriere version: 3.1.9 Host OSVERSION: 1100085 Jail OSVERSION: 1100090 !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100090, Host: 1100085) !!! !!! This is not supported. !!! !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! !!! Expect build failures. !!! Can anyone please say if this is expected? Is anyone running tests/changing things in the ports building infrastructure? I could just ignore the mails, but I never received so many of these before. Thanks. > > Chees. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
pkg-fallout mails
Hi, Since the last week (aprox), I keep receiving pkg-fallout mails for cad/openvsp, all of them with the following warning: !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100089, Host: 1100079) !!! !!! This is not supported. !!! !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! !!! Expect build failures. !!! In the past, when I received one isolated mail, I just ignored it, but I'm receiving them more often now. Something we can do about this? Chees. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
mips pkg-fallout mails
Hi, We have begun building of mips and arm packages for pkg.FreeBSD.org. This resulted in some failure mails being sent to maintainers. This was not the intention at this time. I have disabled further mails to maintainers for emulated builds. They will still go to pkg-fallout though. Regards, Bryan Drewery on behalf of portmgr@ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature