Re: ports head -r484652: lang/ruby24 fails to amd64 -> armv7 cross build: qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (2 of them) [armv7 native build worked]

2018-11-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
Top post about bad comparison: The comparison to x11/pixman turns out to be a misnomer. More testing by Jan B. showed that -O2 vs -O was not sufficient to control the behavior for x11/pixman's builds. pixman's issue traces back to use of .object_arch armv4 in four .S files and them causing

Re: ports head -r484652: lang/ruby24 fails to amd64 -> armv7 cross build: qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (2 of them) [armv7 native build worked]

2018-11-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[While the poudriere-devel/qemu-arm-static/nxb-bin/ amd64 -> armv7 cross build failed, a native armv7 build worked. It turns out the difference that matters is likely -O2 use vs -O use. More later below.] On 2018-Nov-10, at 23:29, Mark Millard wrote: > Poudriere-devel reported: > > [00:18:32]

ports head -r484652: lang/ruby24 fails to amd64 -> armv7 cross build: qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (2 of them)

2018-11-10 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
Poudriere-devel reported: [00:18:32] [07] [00:02:56] Saved lang/ruby24 | ruby-2.4.5,1 wrkdir to: /usr/local/poudriere/data/wrkdirs/FBSDFSSDjailArmV7-default/default/ruby-2.4.5,1.tbz [00:18:32] [07] [00:02:56] Finished lang/ruby24 | ruby-2.4.5,1: Failed: build The log showed: --- miniruby ---