On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 05:44:57PM -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote:
> Could do more for the project -- but looks like nobody needs it. Oh,
> well, I am not insisting.
Persistence is the name of the game. The more PRs you submit, the more
you are likely to attract the attention of the existing commit
,--- You/Mark (Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:54:42 -0500) *
| On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 11:55:19AM -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote:
| > Wouldn't it be better for everybody if more people could commit the
| > changes in their ports themselves? (Subject to a commit-privilege
| > revocation on a substantial break
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 11:55:19AM -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better for everybody if more people could commit the
> changes in their ports themselves? (Subject to a commit-privilege
> revocation on a substantial breakage anyplace).
IMHO: no. Too many people automatically upda
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 11:52:03AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Tue 04 Aug 2009 at 09:21:07 PDT Diego Depaoli wrote:
> >2009/8/4 Doug Barton :
> >> Diego Depaoli wrote:
> >>> There are too many ports and too few people who care them.
> >>> IMHO the options are:
> >>> - decrease the number of p
On Tue 04 Aug 2009 at 09:21:07 PDT Diego Depaoli wrote:
2009/8/4 Doug Barton :
Diego Depaoli wrote:
There are too many ports and too few people who care them.
IMHO the options are:
- decrease the number of ports
We trim dead/useless ports all the time.
- increase the number of volunteers/com
2009/8/4 Doug Barton :
> Diego Depaoli wrote:
>> There are too many ports and too few people who care them.
>> IMHO the options are:
>> - decrease the number of ports
> We trim dead/useless ports all the time.
>> - increase the number of volunteers/committers/testers...
> This is the only valid an
,--- You/Doug (Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:26:08 -0700) *
| > - increase the number of volunteers/committers/testers...
| This is the only valid answer for FreeBSD.
`---*
Take a look at the PR submission and update dates in
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/qu
Diego Depaoli wrote:
> There are too many ports and too few people who care them.
> IMHO the options are:
> - decrease the number of ports
We trim dead/useless ports all the time.
> - increase the number of volunteers/committers/testers...
This is the only valid answer for FreeBSD.
> - switch
2009/8/1 Mark Linimon :
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:37:27PM +0200, Martin Tournoij wrote:
>> I now know more than ever why I switched to OpenBSD.
>> FreeBSD people no longer seem to care about broken ports, or making people
>> who submit broken patches maintainers, or even replying to my messages.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:37:27PM +0200, Martin Tournoij wrote:
> I now know more than ever why I switched to OpenBSD.
> FreeBSD people no longer seem to care about broken ports, or making people
> who submit broken patches maintainers, or even replying to my messages.
First of all, I have to apo
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:00:04 -0400, Wesley Shields
wrote:
> And this is why I think we should have a policy of not changing
> maintainer of things based upon mailing list traffic. I know I'm
> guilty of doing it in the past but I have come to the conclusion that it
> can cause these kinds of probl
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 04:52:00PM +0200, Martin Tournoij wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:00:13 +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> > Martin Tournoij ha scritto:
> >> Really, I have better things to do, I would have liked to do this in a
> >> nicer way, but I've been waiting for more than a week to revert
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:00:13 +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Martin Tournoij ha scritto:
>> Really, I have better things to do, I would have liked to do this in a
>> nicer way, but I've been waiting for more than a week to revert the
>> maintainer switch
>
> Do you mean you never approved the switch,
Martin Tournoij ha scritto:
> Really, I have better things to do, I would have liked to do this in a
> nicer way, but I've been waiting for more than a week to revert the
> maintainer switch
Do you mean you never approved the switch, as stated in the commit log?
Change maintainer to scjamo...@bsd
I now know more than ever why I switched to OpenBSD.
FreeBSD people no longer seem to care about broken ports, or making people
who submit broken patches maintainers, or even replying to my messages.
Really, I have better things to do, I would have liked to do this in a
nicer way, but I've been wa
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:17:11 -0700, Charlie Kester
wrote:
> On Wed 15 Jul 2009 at 14:08:18 PDT Martin Tournoij wrote:
>>On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:47:19 -0500, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>> I have noticed some maintainer-timeouts on ports that you maintain.
>>> Please let me know if you are still inte
On Wed 15 Jul 2009 at 14:08:18 PDT Martin Tournoij wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:47:19 -0500, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have noticed some maintainer-timeouts on ports that you maintain.
Please let me know if you are still interested in these ports;
otherwise,
I would like to reassign them.
* Martin Tournoij (carpetsmo...@rwxrwxrwx.net) wrote:
> I thought about it during the last week, and will resign the
> maintainership of
> all my ports in the coming weeks, (For a few ports I have a few changes/
> updates in the pipeline I would like to finish).
Is it ok to take graphics/geeqie?
Hey Frank-
On Jul 16, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Frank Steinborn wrote:
Martin Tournoij wrote:
games/avanor
games/crimson
games/wrogue
I would take these.
You are now that maintainer of those ports. Treat them well ;)
--
Steven Kreuzer
http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer
___
Hey Sylvio-
On Jul 16, 2009, at 7:36 AM, Sylvio Cesar wrote:
Hi guys,
I would like to be the maintainer of ports
audio/csound
devel/cdialog
print/scribus
sysutils/bashburn
sysutils/daa2iso
sysutils/mybashburn
sysutils/uif2iso
You are now that maintainer of those ports. Treat them well ;)
-
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:45:28 -0400, Steven Kreuzer
wrote:
> Hey Frank-
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Frank Steinborn wrote:
>
>> Martin Tournoij wrote:
>>
>>> games/avanor
>>> games/crimson
>>> games/wrogue
>>
>> I would take these.
>
> You are now that maintainer of those ports. Treat them
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:45:07 -0400, Steven Kreuzer
wrote:
> Hey Sylvio-
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 7:36 AM, Sylvio Cesar wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I would like to be the maintainer of ports
>>
>> audio/csound
>> devel/cdialog
>> print/scribus
>> sysutils/bashburn
>> sysutils/daa2iso
>> sysutils/my
Martin Tournoij wrote:
> games/avanor
> games/crimson
> games/wrogue
I would take these.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freeb
Hi guys,
I would like to be the maintainer of ports
audio/csound
devel/cdialog
print/scribus
sysutils/bashburn
sysutils/daa2iso
sysutils/mybashburn
sysutils/uif2iso
I am very active and the ports would help even more.
Regards,
Sylvio Cesar.
2009/7/15 Martin Tournoij :
> On Sun, 5 J
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:47:19 -0500, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> I have noticed some maintainer-timeouts on ports that you maintain.
> Please let me know if you are still interested in these ports;
otherwise,
> I would like to reassign them. Thanks.
>
> mcl
>
> audio/mpdscribble car
25 matches
Mail list logo
