Hi Nick!
FWIW, I have the squid port installed on hundreds of systems, however I do
not use the port defaults and have logs and cache on a separate filesystem
mounted in /squid (i.e., /squid/logs, /squid/cache). In my opinion, it
makes sense for the port to default to using
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:05 AM, timp tim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nick!
FWIW, I have the squid port installed on hundreds of systems, however I
do
not use the port defaults and have logs and cache on a separate
filesystem
mounted in /squid (i.e., /squid/logs, /squid/cache). In my
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:39:39 -0700 (MST)
timp wrote:
Squid can use more than one cache directory, so it makes sense to
have the default cache directory as a sub-directory of squid/.
Additional cache dirs can be created manually by user in /var/squid, I
agree. Like
/www-squid-s-cache-dir-tp6025127p6025455.html
To unsubscribe from www/squid's cache dir, click here.
NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/www-squid-s-cache-dir-tp6025127p6025458.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 04:25:56 -0700 (MST)
timp wrote:
Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you?
Actually I do see the difference - I think the current layout is
better. My point was that I can't see any difference isn't a good
argument for making disruptive change.
I think it's obvious
Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you?
Actually I do see the difference - I think the current layout is
better. My point was that I can't see any difference isn't a good
argument for making disruptive change.
I think it's obvious that putting multiple caches under one
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:33 AM, timp tim...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so you don't see the difference too, do you?
Actually I do see the difference - I think the current layout is
better. My point was that I can't see any difference isn't a good
argument for making disruptive change.
Hi!
A question was born in my mind about www/squid port:
Do we really need a separate /var/squid dir for 'cache' and always
empty 'logs' subdirs?
Squid's logs are really in /var/log/squid, not in /var/squid/logs.
So I think what if we had cache dir like /var/cache/squid, and got rig
of
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:33:33 +0300
Pavel Timofeev wrote:
Hi!
A question was born in my mind about www/squid port:
Do we really need a separate /var/squid dir for 'cache' and always
empty 'logs' subdirs?
Squid's logs are really in /var/log/squid, not in /var/squid/logs.
So I think what
I can see a case for fixing the Makefile so the log directory is
created in the right place.
What do you mean? It's already created and used by port in right place -
/var/log/squid.
Moving the squid directory itself wouldn't avoid creating
/var/squid/logs.
And there is no need to move
10 matches
Mail list logo
