Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread Benjamin Lutz
On Friday 18 May 2007 09:50, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2007-May-17 23:31:57 +0200, Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just before old package deinstall, scan the list of files installed by old port (pkg_info -g). Match .so.X files under PREFIX/lib and any ldconfig'ed paths 1*), copy them

Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread Robert Huff
Benjamin Lutz writes: The last part seems to be the catch here. How about providing a tool that scans all binaries in the standard locations for what libs they depend on, and also allows the user/admin to specify the paths to binaries that he installed on his own, then outputs a list of

Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread Benjamin Lutz
On Friday 18 May 2007 14:38, Robert Huff wrote: Benjamin Lutz writes: The last part seems to be the catch here. How about providing a tool that scans all binaries in the standard locations for what libs they depend on, and also allows the user/admin to specify the paths to binaries

Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread Michel Talon
Benjamin Lutz wrote: Benjamin Lutz writes: The last part seems to be the catch here. How about providing a tool that scans all binaries in the standard locations for what libs they depend on, and also allows the user/admin to specify the paths to binaries that he installed on

Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread RW
On Fri, 18 May 2007 08:38:40 -0400 Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Benjamin Lutz writes: The last part seems to be the catch here. How about providing a tool that scans all binaries in the standard locations for what libs they depend on, and also allows the user/admin to specify

Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread Robert Huff
RW writes: The last part seems to be the catch here. How about providing a tool that scans all binaries in the standard locations for what libs they depend on, and also allows the user/admin to specify the paths to binaries that he installed on his own, then outputs a

Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread Pav Lucistnik
RW píše v pá 18. 05. 2007 v 15:47 +0100: One thing that does worry me a bit, is the possibility that a new port install might find these one of these orphaned libraries, and fail to install a LIB_DEPENDS port. Can't happen. Ports infrastructure does not check lib/compat/pkg when satisfying

Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 5/18/07, Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do not try this at home When in need of emergency disk space, my first trick is to flush /usr/ports/distfiles and /usr/obj. If that's not enough, I empty /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg. About one time in twenty I discover

www/trac with mysql

2007-05-18 Thread David Southwell
Hi How do I configure trac to use mysql rather than sqlite?? Thanks in advance david ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: www/trac with mysql

2007-05-18 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 5/18/07, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi How do I configure trac to use mysql rather than sqlite?? You'll need to make the following changes to the ports Makefile: 1. Add `MYSQL Use MySQL instead of SQLite3 Off \' to OPTIONS 2. Make the following change to the database

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

2007-05-18 Thread David Thiel
So, I've upgraded one more machine, an X60 Tablet, and have run into some issues on this one. First and most important, my ability to use the 1920x1200 resolution has disappeared. I've been using the 915resolution tool to add this mode to the 945GM bios, but Xorg now insists there is no mode of

Re: FreeBSD Port: security/expiretable

2007-05-18 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Fri, 18 May 2007 01:57:54 +0300 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: Hello, FreeBSD ns2.domain.com 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Thu May 17 22:10:51 UTC 2007 I see these errors. messages.c: In function `error': messages.c:34: warning: ISO C does not support the

Re: xorg7.2 upgrade and glxgears

2007-05-18 Thread David Thiel
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:49:45PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: It seems that the WITH_NVIDIA_GL=0 triggers the ifdef statements in yuvrect_client.c. So I suggest this is a bug in the port. Setting WITH_NVIDIA_GL simply shouldn't happen. After fixing the port it builds and installs fine.

Re: xorg7.2 upgrade and glxgears

2007-05-18 Thread David Thiel
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:47:58AM -0700, David Thiel wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ 755 ] glxgears libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x5b X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation) Major opcode of failed request: 159 (DAMAGE)

Re: www/trac with mysql

2007-05-18 Thread Uwe Grohnwaldt
Hi David, informations about creating a trac-environment with mysql/pgsql are on the trac-website: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/DatabaseBackend and http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracInstall Uwe On Fri, 18 May 2007 09:48:19 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi How do I

Re: www/trac with mysql

2007-05-18 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Fri, 18 May 2007 09:48:19 -0700 David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: Hi How do I configure trac to use mysql rather than sqlite?? I beleive, you should better contact trac developer with such kind of question. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE pgp4fWfcqn1QB.pgp Description: PGP

Re: Patch to add package-smart target

2007-05-18 Thread Adam Martin
On 2007.02.21, at 00:47, Adam Martin wrote: Hello, I wasn't sure who to send this to, but Benno Rice suggested ports@ and kris@, so I've done both. I've created a patch for a target that I've added to bsd.ports.mk (in /usr/ports/Mk/) a while back, to fix what I consider a problem in

Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread Doug Barton
Pav Lucistnik wrote: Doug Barton píše v c(t 17. 05. 2007 v 13:06 -0700: What might be useful in this regard is if someone were to start a new thread describing exactly what the desired behavior is, and ideally to include a description of how portupgrade does it now. Just before old package

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

2007-05-18 Thread James Snyder
Another successful upgrade to report, although not without some trials and tribulations. The end result is that I have things going with the NVIDIA drivers, compositing works (I've even fired up Compiz and though that's not 100% stable, it's quite usable so long as a few things are avoided.

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:23:28PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le Jeu 10 mai 07 ? 23:28:17 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?crivait?: We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to test the

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:30:32PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le Jeu 10 mai 07 ? 23:28:17 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?crivait?: We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to test the

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:46:57PM +0100, Tim Bishop wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into CVS. Finished, at last

Re: xorg 7.2 xorg-protos BUILD_DEPENDS wrong?

2007-05-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:11:25PM -0400, Andrew Partan wrote: I had no problems on my build server; I managed to build all of the packages just fine. I even rebuilt all of the packages (portupgrade -afp) and that worked just fine as well. However, when I went to do a package install of

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-18 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Ven 18 mai 07 à 23:06:39 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : And another problem with x11-toolkits/py-qt: on this machine, both QT3 and QT4 are installed, and in the new order it seems that QT4 is detected before QT4. OK, that one should be reported to the maintainers.

Re: xorg 7.2 xorg-protos BUILD_DEPENDS wrong?

2007-05-18 Thread Andrew Partan
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:16:48PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:11:25PM -0400, Andrew Partan wrote: I had no problems on my build server; I managed to build all of the packages just fine. I even rebuilt all of the packages (portupgrade -afp) and that worked just

xorg 7.2 xorg-protos BUILD_DEPENDS wrong?

2007-05-18 Thread Andrew Partan
I had no problems on my build server; I managed to build all of the packages just fine. I even rebuilt all of the packages (portupgrade -afp) and that worked just fine as well. However, when I went to do a package install of xorg on a brand new server, I ran into dependency problems: n-tower#

Re: xorg 7.2 xorg-protos BUILD_DEPENDS wrong?

2007-05-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:27:42PM -0400, Andrew Partan wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:16:48PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:11:25PM -0400, Andrew Partan wrote: I had no problems on my build server; I managed to build all of the packages just fine. I even

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le Ven 18 mai 07 ? 23:06:39 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?crivait?: And another problem with x11-toolkits/py-qt: on this machine, both QT3 and QT4 are installed, and in the new order it seems that QT4 is detected

Re: xorg 7.2 xorg-protos BUILD_DEPENDS wrong?

2007-05-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:32:59PM +0200, Dejan Lesjak wrote: But the BUILD_DEPENDS for x11/xorg-protos is wrong nevertheless (as seen in grep outputs you've snipped). I'll go and fix that... OK, thanks for analysing. Kris ___

Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2007-May-18 17:50:58 +1000, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ideally, you also need some way to identify (and remove) old .so files that are no longer referenced by anything. This is not as easy because there's no record of what ports use what .so's (and no way to track apps outside the

Re: xorg 7.2 xorg-protos BUILD_DEPENDS wrong?

2007-05-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Andrew Partan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, when I went to do a package install of xorg on a brand new server, I ran into dependency problems: n-tower# portinstall -PP xorg [...] fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-6.2-release/All/xf86rushproto-1.1.2.tbz:

Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans

2007-05-18 Thread Craig Boston
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:24:02PM -0500, James Snyder wrote: Window decorations died once while switching back and forth to another virtual terminal and GL screensavers hang up (first frame rendered, subsequent ones do not). I've been meaning to post on this subject, though have been looking

Re: Specs for saving old shared libs

2007-05-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:47:30AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2007-May-18 17:50:58 +1000, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ideally, you also need some way to identify (and remove) old .so files that are no longer referenced by anything. This is not as easy because there's no record of

I won't be available for some time (moving)

2007-05-18 Thread Danny Pansters
Hello, I wanted to let you know that on May 24 I'm going to move to another house and I won't be having an internet connection for a while, one week or more. Last time, moving from one address to another took my cable provider a whopping 6 weeks. (The network speed, once working, is great

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-18 Thread Arno J. Klaassen
Hello, after solving the libthr.so problem being overwritten by the -m32 version, the upgrade went flawlessly in one hit. Congratulations! Nevertheless, three minor observations : - mergebase.sh failed (after resolving conflicts) with Merge failed. But the script removes ${errfile}. A mv

Re: xorg 7.2 xorg-protos BUILD_DEPENDS wrong?

2007-05-18 Thread Dejan Lesjak
On Friday 18 May 2007 23:11:25 Andrew Partan wrote: I had no problems on my build server; I managed to build all of the packages just fine. I even rebuilt all of the packages (portupgrade -afp) and that worked just fine as well. [snip] It looks to me like some of the BUILD_DEPENDS for

Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 12:18:38AM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: Hello, after solving the libthr.so problem being overwritten by the -m32 version, the upgrade went flawlessly in one hit. Congratulations! Nevertheless, three minor observations : - mergebase.sh failed (after resolving

Re: xorg 7.2 xorg-protos BUILD_DEPENDS wrong?

2007-05-18 Thread Andrew Partan
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:33:35PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: No, I built all of the xorg 7.2 packages on my build server; if the package install could not find a package, it means that some package didn't get built. I have all the entire ports tree (with all of the packages) nfs-mounted