Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

2009-11-10 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 08:51:25AM +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought that svn did its own checksumming. If so why do we need to our own? Subversion's checksumming makes sure that you get exactly the same files that are on the Subversion server at this particular

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

2009-11-10 Thread Jonathan
On 11/8/2009 10:31 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: I was hoping to get a bit more of a response to a recent posting of mine with regard to using svn to fetch files for ports My proposal: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg23776.html A summary of what has been going on:

sqlite and tcl

2009-11-10 Thread Alex Dupre
As you have seen, the up-to-date sqlite port requires tcl for *building*. A few of you complained about it, but I don't understand why you are not complaining about ports that have perl or python configure scripts, too ;-) Said so, I have a patch to switch the sqlite port to use the amalgamation

Re: sqlite and tcl

2009-11-10 Thread andrew clarke
On Tue 2009-11-10 15:51:11 UTC+0100, Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote: As you have seen, the up-to-date sqlite port requires tcl for *building*. A few of you complained about it, but I don't understand why you are not complaining about ports that have perl or python configure scripts, too

Re: sqlite and tcl

2009-11-10 Thread Outback Dingo
Actually i question why the extra tcl is even required. On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM, andrew clarke m...@ozzmosis.com wrote: On Tue 2009-11-10 15:51:11 UTC+0100, Alex Dupre (a...@freebsd.org) wrote: As you have seen, the up-to-date sqlite port requires tcl for *building*. A few of you

Re: New port: sysutils/megacli waiting to commit

2009-11-10 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Doug Ambrisko wrote: Sean McAfee writes: | Frank J. Laszlo wrote: | Philip M. Gollucci wrote: | Vladimir Ermakov wrote: | | Hi, all. | please appreciate my port *megacli* | | http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655 | | | Is that different from this the port, is it an update? | |

Re: New port: sysutils/megacli waiting to commit

2009-11-10 Thread Sean McAfee
Doug Ambrisko wrote: Sean McAfee writes: | Frank J. Laszlo wrote: | Philip M. Gollucci wrote: | Vladimir Ermakov wrote: | | Hi, all. | please appreciate my port *megacli* | | http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655 | | | Is that different from this the port, is it an

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

2009-11-10 Thread RW
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:32:28 +0200 Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote: The Ports Collection's distfile checksums make sure that you get exactly the same files *as the port maintainer examined at some previous moment in time*. More importantly it guards against maliciously modified source

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

2009-11-10 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eitan Adler wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought that svn did its own checksumming. If so why do we need to our own? In God we trust, everyone else must have an X.509 certificate. Well, that's not necessarily be a X.509 certificate but it

Re: sqlite and tcl

2009-11-10 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com writes: Actually i question why the extra tcl is even required. I took a quick look at the sources and there are tcl scripts providing part of the build infrastructure. A few other things, too, but that was enough to explain the dependency.

Re: New port: sysutils/megacli waiting to commit

2009-11-10 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Miroslav Lachman writes: | Doug Ambrisko wrote: | Sean McAfee writes: | | Frank J. Laszlo wrote: | | Philip M. Gollucci wrote: | | Vladimir Ermakov wrote: | | | | Hi, all. | | please appreciate my port *megacli* | | | | http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655 | | | | | |

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

2009-11-10 Thread Eitan Adler
Alright - I updated the wiki page to summarize the thread so far. I'd appreciate if people could comment on the spec part specifically. I'd like to see that section become much more specific (so that I could use it to unambiguously write something based off of it) I'm holding off on writing any

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

2009-11-10 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:12:40PM +, RW wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:32:28 +0200 Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote: The Ports Collection's distfile checksums make sure that you get exactly the same files *as the port maintainer examined at some previous moment in time*.

Re: Portmaster with package support ready for beta testing

2009-11-10 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Miroslav Lachman wrote: Doug Barton wrote: Michel Talon wrote: Miroslav Lachman wrote: I take a quick look at the code and I have one question. Can you explain way --no-deps and --force are used for pkg_add? I can only venture an explanation. Once you have computed a good order for