bsd.gcc.mk: USE_FORTRAN.

2012-09-17 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Hi Gerald, is there any possibility to also add something like USE_FORTRAN_BUILD=[yes|g77|ifort] to make fortran build dependency only? Many ports will benefit from this - anything, that depend on math/py-numpy for example. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.

pkgng repository URL for minor version

2012-09-17 Thread Oleg Ginzburg
What is the method in a repository of pkg there to split packages for difference minor version? At present PACKAGESSITE set to http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest, where $ABI forming URL on 9.0 or 9.1/amd64 into http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest/ How it is possible to specify

[patch] --disable-jit for ia64 in devel/pcre

2012-09-17 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
devel/pcre fails on ia64 portscluster because defaults include JIT: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ia64-errorlogs/e.9.20120916093935/pcre-8.31.log This patch fixes it. I checked it on my own ia64 boxes: Index: Makefile ===

Re: pkgng repository URL for minor version

2012-09-17 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 09/17/12 11:12, Oleg Ginzburg wrote: What is the method in a repository of pkg there to split packages for difference minor version? At present PACKAGESSITE set to http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest, where $ABI forming URL on 9.0 or 9.1/amd64 into

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2012-09-17 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and

Re: bsd.gcc.mk: USE_FORTRAN.

2012-09-17 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 17.09.2012 15:08: From owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Mon Sep 17 11:43:21 2012 USE_FORTRAN_BUILD=[yes|g77|ifort] to make fortran build dependency only? ifort? Is there Intel fortran for FreeBSD? Anton lang/ifc according to bsd.gcc.mk --

Re: bsd.gcc.mk: USE_FORTRAN.

2012-09-17 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Mon Sep 17 11:43:21 2012 USE_FORTRAN_BUILD=[yes|g77|ifort] to make fortran build dependency only? ifort? Is there Intel fortran for FreeBSD? Anton ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

update failed for editors/libreoffice libreoffice-3.5.6.2

2012-09-17 Thread Joerg Surmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, i'm running freebsd-9.0 the update libreoffice from ports to 3.5.6.2 hangs here: internal build errors: ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.6.2/vcl/prj after:

Re: [patch] --disable-jit for ia64 in devel/pcre

2012-09-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:12:35AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: devel/pcre fails on ia64 portscluster because defaults include JIT: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ia64-errorlogs/e.9.20120916093935/pcre-8.31.log This patch fixes it. I checked it on my own ia64 boxes: Index:

vlx 2.0.3 plugins

2012-09-17 Thread ajtiM
Hi! I installed VLC 2.0.3 on FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0 (clang) and it works very good but I don't know how installed plugins for Opera and Firefox. I search for vlcplugin.so as I had on earlier version (1.?) but I didn't find it. Please help me. Thanks in advance. Mitja

[HEADS UP] Change to the header in ports Makefiles, take two

2012-09-17 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
It was recently posted on, http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/ that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles. The initial discussion seemed to show enough support for the idea of completely stripping the header, leaving only the

[CORRECTION] Change to the header in ports Makefiles, take two

2012-09-17 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
It was recently posted on, http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/ that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles. The initial discussion seemed to show enough support for the idea of completely stripping the header, leaving only the

Re: [HEADS UP] Change to the header in ports Makefiles, take two

2012-09-17 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: [...] Sometimes, as a result of a repocopy, or changed maintainership, the Created By and MAINTAINER is no longer in synchronisation. To avoid confusion, the first line can be removed, to ensure only the MAINTAINER is

Re: [CORRECTION] Change to the header in ports Makefiles, take two

2012-09-17 Thread Freddie Cash
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Abthorpe portmgr-secret...@freebsd.org wrote: It was recently posted on, http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/ that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles. The initial discussion seemed to

Re: [CORRECTION] Change to the header in ports Makefiles, take two

2012-09-17 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 09/17/12 11:43, Freddie Cash wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Abthorpe portmgr-secret...@freebsd.org wrote: It was recently posted on, http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/ that we would adopt a new header for the ports

Re: [patch] --disable-jit for ia64 in devel/pcre

2012-09-17 Thread Martin Matuska
Actually, I see no reason for having JIT in options at all, as it only provides additional functions, there is no signifficant difference in size and the port license doesn't change. I have simply enabled it anywhere besides sparc64 and ia64. On 17.9.2012 17:25, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon,

Re: [CORRECTION] Change to the header in ports Makefiles, take two

2012-09-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Abthorpe portmgr-secret...@freebsd.org wrote: It was recently posted on, http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/ that we would adopt

Re: [CORRECTION] Change to the header in ports Makefiles, take two

2012-09-17 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
[ Jeremy Messenger wrote on Mon 17.Sep'12 at 11:59:08 -0500 ] IMHO, of course. :) I don't care if it's IMHO, but dude you are pain in ass already. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com What is a pain in the arse are comments like this. We use FreeBSD and people make decisions about

Re: x11-toolkits/swt

2012-09-17 Thread Doug Barton
On 09/12/2012 00:42, Doug Barton wrote: On 09/11/2012 05:58 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: Hello guys; - Original Message - ... 2012/9/11 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org: Now that we have a new version of libxul in the ports tree, any plans of upgrading swt to take advantage of it?