Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-09-29 Thread Thomas Mueller
Excerpt from Jan Beich: > Why did portupgrade skip rebuilding print/harfbuzz-icu before building > editors/libreoffice? The dependency trees of most desktop applications > are so complex that the build falls apart if the upgrade tools aren't > robust enough e.g., ignore MOVED or PORTREVISION

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-09-29 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-09-29 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
> What is the current status of portupgrade and portmaster? > > I haven't used portupgrade in some time, but what about portmaster? > > What is one officially supposed to use to build and upgrade packages from > source? In the interests of having some numbers other than email list replies I

Re: head -r324071 system clang 5 based powerpc64 building ports: lang/gcc7 messed up by a matching name vec_step? [vec_step macro name in gcc7's altivec.h]

2017-09-29 Thread Mark Millard
[Looks like gcc7 might be causing its own problem via a vec_step macro name in its altivec.h .] On 2017-Sep-29, at 1:14 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > I attempted a poudriere based build of some > ports and the gcc7 build involved failed > with the following sorts of notices: > > >

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-09-29 Thread Carmel NY
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:00:02 +, Thomas Mueller stated: >Excerpt from Jan Beich: > >> Why did portupgrade skip rebuilding print/harfbuzz-icu before building >> editors/libreoffice? The dependency trees of most desktop applications >> are so complex that the build falls apart if the upgrade

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

2017-09-29 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Russell Haley wrote: Thanks! I'll play with this on the weekend. Please create a review at https://reviews.freebsd.org/ and add me as a reviewer. Thanks! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-09-29 Thread Chris H
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:38:36 + Carmel NY wrote > On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:00:02 +, Thomas Mueller stated: > > >Excerpt from Jan Beich: > > > >> Why did portupgrade skip rebuilding print/harfbuzz-icu before building > >> editors/libreoffice? The dependency trees of

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-09-29 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > What is one officially supposed to use to build and upgrade > packages from source? I doubt that we already have a 'official' consensus, but buildung using poudriere, while expensive from the hardware resource point of view, looks to me as the most stable way to do it. -- p...@opsec.eu

Port Request: FreeIPA

2017-09-29 Thread Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-ports
Hi, It seems very useful.  I ended up in an environment using it.  (Yeah, CentOS... but)  It's really quite amazing. Most of the requisite software is already ported with the exception of the OpenPKI system known as 'Dogtag'. Between SSSD and FreeIPA, it seems like something truly useful has

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-09-29 Thread Matt Smith
On Sep 29 20:23, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! What is one officially supposed to use to build and upgrade packages from source? I doubt that we already have a 'official' consensus, but buildung using poudriere, while expensive from the hardware resource point of view, looks to me as the most

head -r324071 system clang 5 based powerpc64 building ports: x11-toolkit/qt5-gui gets "clang++: error: unknown argument: '-mminimal-toc'"

2017-09-29 Thread Mark Millard
I attempted a poudriere based build of some ports and the qt5-gui build involved failed with the following sorts of notices. But the context is using the same sources as I've been testing various proposed armv6 related build fixes with (fixes taken from bugzilla activity, not my own). I doubt that

Re: head -r324071 system clang 5 based powerpc64 building ports: lang/gcc7 messed up by a matching name vec_step? [vec_step macro name in gcc7's altivec.h]

2017-09-29 Thread Mark Millard
Summary of later additions: devel/powerpc64-gcc has the same problem as gcc7 in this clang-based powerpc64. My note about using gcc 4.2.1 for the kernel build was wrong. (My 32-bit powerpc builds are that way, not the powerpc64 ones.) On 2017-Sep-29, at 1:51 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > [Looks

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

2017-09-29 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, the wise Thomas Mueller wrote: What is the current status of portupgrade and portmaster? I haven't used portupgrade in some time, but what about portmaster? Using portupgrade every day and still works great. Tried portmaster once but liked portupgrade more. I use