FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2021-02-06 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > Unfortunately make for bind9.16.11 stops with > exec: /usr/local/bin/autoreconf-2.69: not found If you're really still at a very old bind version, which version of FreeBSD are you running ? autoreconf comes from package autoconf-wrapper-20131203 > The same error has been presented by at

Re: having trouble "svn up"-ing /usr/ports/

2021-02-06 Thread Michael Schuster
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:29 PM Guido Falsi wrote: > On 05/02/21 18:11, Michael Schuster wrote: > > Hi, > > > > sorry if this is the wrong group - please point me to the proper place if > > that's the case. > > > > I updated to Current (14) on Feb 2nd from source (including running > >

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 07:52:12PM +0100, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > On 06/02/2021 18:31, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 06:03:38PM +0100, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums > > Administrator wrote: > > > On 06/02/2021 17:50, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > Would

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:50:21AM -0800, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: > > https://www.freshports.org/devel/autoconf reports that > perl is a dependency: > > Build dependencies: > ??? gm4 : devel/m4 > ??? help2man : misc/help2man > ??? gmake : devel/gmake > ???

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator
On 06/02/2021 20:53, bob prohaska wrote: perl5-5.32.0_1 perl5.30-5.30.3_1 The former is correct; no idea where the latter comes from; Perl 5.30 usually looks like 'perl5-5.30.0'. Older version follow that notation (perl5-5.26.2). Manual install? I don't know what to advise you here? I

Handling directory ownership in pkg-plist

2021-02-06 Thread Chris Rees
Hi all, Resurrecting audio/ampache-resurrect, and I have @owner www/@group www above all of the WWWDIR files, and they are correctly owned. However, the directories under it are all still owned by root:wheel, and if I explicitly add them all with @dir pkg then complains about not being able

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
https://www.freshports.org/devel/autoconf reports that perl is a dependency: Build dependencies: • gm4 : devel/m4 • help2man : misc/help2man • gmake : devel/gmake • makeinfo : print/texinfo • perl5>=5.28.r1<5.29 : lang/perl5.28 Runtime dependencies:

INDEX build failed for 11.x

2021-02-06 Thread Ports Index build
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- ---

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:21:55AM -0800, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: > bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on > Sat Feb 6 16:50:16 UTC 2021 : > > > Looks like a path problem, so > > > > root at pelorus > > :/usr/ports/devel/autoconf # $PATH > >

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator
On 06/02/2021 18:31, bob prohaska wrote: On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 06:03:38PM +0100, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: On 06/02/2021 17:50, bob prohaska wrote: Would installing the autoconf port install autoreconf? autoconf-wrapper-20131203 is a requirement of autoconf-2.69_3,

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread Tatsuki Makino
There is also "pkg info -l perl5", which is a way to find where perl has gone. bob prohaska wrote on 2021/02/07 05:07: ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 09:21:58AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > Unfortunately make for bind9.16.11 stops with > > exec: /usr/local/bin/autoreconf-2.69: not found > > If you're really still at a very old bind version, which version > of FreeBSD are you running ? > I was using bind916,

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator
On 06/02/2021 17:50, bob prohaska wrote: Would installing the autoconf port install autoreconf? autoconf-wrapper-20131203 is a requirement of autoconf-2.69_3, so yes. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on Sat Feb 6 16:50:16 UTC 2021 : > Looks like a path problem, so > > root at pelorus > :/usr/ports/devel/autoconf # $PATH > /sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin: > Command not found. > > Paths look reasonable, but

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread bob prohaska
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:44:27PM -0800, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > On Sat, 6 Feb 2021, Greg Rivers via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > On Saturday, 6 February 2021 00:56:58 CST bob prohaska wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:00:36PM -0600, Greg Rivers via freebsd-ports > > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 06:03:38PM +0100, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > On 06/02/2021 17:50, bob prohaska wrote: > > Would installing the autoconf port install autoreconf? > > autoconf-wrapper-20131203 is a requirement of autoconf-2.69_3, so yes. > Aye, there's the rub:

Question on figuring out category for new port

2021-02-06 Thread Adam Jimerson
Hello so I was wanting to make a new port for python-adblock (https://github.com/ArniDagur/python-adblock) so it can be added as a dependency of www/qutebrowser but I'm not quite sure what is the correct category for such a port. I can easily see it falling under net, net-mgmt, or www although

Re: Cornucopia of chromium compile warnings

2021-02-06 Thread Tatsuki Makino
They're Linux users. :) That's why they only use gcc. :) What is implicitly allowed in gcc is not allowed in llvm. :) George Mitchell wrote on 2021/02/07 10:37: > Can I safely assume that the upstream chromium developers are most > likely unaware of the MULTIPLE THOUSANDS of clang compile

Re: Bind9 security upgrade

2021-02-06 Thread bob prohaska
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 09:05:49PM +0100, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > On 06/02/2021 20:53, bob prohaska wrote: > > perl5-5.32.0_1 > > perl5.30-5.30.3_1 > > The former is correct; no idea where the latter comes from; Perl 5.30 > usually looks like 'perl5-5.30.0'. > >

Cornucopia of chromium compile warnings

2021-02-06 Thread George Mitchell
Can I safely assume that the upstream chromium developers are most likely unaware of the MULTIPLE THOUSANDS of clang compile warnings generated during the chromium compile phase on FreeBSD? (I imagine that they don't care, either.) -- George OpenPGP_signature

FreeBSD Port: bison-3.7.5,1 core dumped

2021-02-06 Thread Alex V. Petrov
Hello! I have problem with bison. During build some ports. during doxygen build: /usr/bin/make -f src/CMakeFiles/doxymain.dir/build.make src/CMakeFiles/doxymain.dir/depend [ 31%] [BISON][constexp] Building parser with bison 3.7.5 cd /usr/ports/devel/doxygen/work/doxygen-1.9.0/src &&

INDEX now builds successfully on 11.x

2021-02-06 Thread Ports Index build
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Handling directory ownership in pkg-plist

2021-02-06 Thread Chris
On 2021-02-06 13:34, Chris Rees wrote: Hi all, Resurrecting audio/ampache-resurrect, and I have @owner www/@group www above all of the WWWDIR files, and they are correctly owned. However, the directories under it are all still owned by root:wheel, and if I explicitly add them all with @dir