Hi,
I've written some patches for the ports infrastructure importing the
fakeroot implementation from midnightbsd ports.
In my first implementation the fake directory was enabled by default, no
ports had to be modified to support it.
My second implementation added a knob to add to make.conf (USE_
Fucking gmail, I replyed in private instead of the list so here is the
reply, sorry
> That's actually a good idea. I'm quite used to fakeroot already from
> some work I've been doing in Debian.
>
>
Currently the fakeroot is not something like the debian fakeroot, ie it is
just a directory that i
behaviour is optionnal in the last patch.
regards,
Bapt
2009/9/3 Ulrich Spörlein
>
> On Mon, 31.08.2009 at 23:26:43 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've written some patches for the ports infrastructure importing the
> > fakeroot implementatio
Hi,
Here is a more complete ZSH completion for portmaster, can people test
it and validate it please.
to make it work, copy it to /usr/local/share/zsh/site-functions
reload you zsh
and portmaster [tab]
http://github.com/bapt/zfbsd/blob/master/_portmaster
Thanks,
Bapt
__
>
> @Baptiste, feature request for csup :>. Currently csup -L2 /etc/[tab] gives:
> No matches for: `verbosity level' or `corrections'
>
> Sorry for the little hijack, feel free to take it off list.
> --
> Mel
>
I'll have a look at thi (and correct it :)) tomorrow.
_
2009/12/12 Frank Staals :
> Anh Ky Huynh wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I often use TeXLive instead of teTeX which isn't been developed anymore.
>> After I remove teTeX from system, I encounter some problems when
>> building/upgrading ports. For example, _evince_, _lyx_ couldn't be built
>> without teT
Hi all,
I have updated the fakeroot patch, it now can apply on an uptodate version of
the ports.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/133815
For information the fakeroot patch is a port of the midnightbsd's mports
fakeroot
to freebsd's ports.
What it does:
- it is optional: you can
>
> I didn't try http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/ yet but as far as I
> read in the wiki page
>http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/wiki/Installing
> this port is for *TeXLive 2008* only. TeXLive 2008 has binaries files for
> FreeBSD (so I can install TeXLive from the live CD
>
> Uh -- is it actually possible to create an empty directory when installing
> from
> a pkg tarball?
>
> I ran into this problem with the phpMyAdmin port, and the only good way I
> found
> to solve it was to add a stub file into any empty directories. You could
> use a post install script or an
2009/12/15 Warren Block :
> A suggestion: USE_FAKE is not descriptive. It doesn't tell what is fake or
> what happens. I'm not sure fake is the even the right word.
>
> USE_FAKEROOT is better, but still ambiguous: it's not really fake, and
> "root" can mean too many things.
>
> I guess what I'm t
> I don't know if this should be a port setting. I think this should be
> a user setting. So, I think WITH_FAKE / WITH_FAKEROOT is a better
> choice. Obviously ports not working with fakeroot would have to define
> something like IGNORE_FAKEROOT, the same kind of variable we have for
> MAKE_JOBS.
>
Le Sunday 31 Jan 2010 à 23:44:12 (+0100), Thomas Zander a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I have spent some time working on the experimental new mplayer port
> and the (dissatisfying) x264 story today, and those of you who are
> interested can find the results here:
> http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20100
Le Saturday 27 Mar 2010 à 17:32:42 (+0100), Marco Beishuizen a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering why LyX in the FreeBSD ports isn't upgraded anymore. The
> current version in ports is still 1.5.7, but the latest LyX version is
> 1.6.5. The version in ports is 1,5 years old.
>
Probably because n
Hi all,
I just send a new fakeroot patch for the ports (uptodate).
Patch can be found here : ports/133815
the patch as begun as a port of the fakeroot implementation from
midnightbsd ports system.
What it does : basically it install everything in a fakeroot
repository creates a package respecting
Hi,
What about removing the -A option from FETCH_ARGS to allow fetch to
follow 302 code.
It causes trouble when using some authenticated proxies.
It also causes troubles with github which is more and more used. Lots
of projects on github doesn't provides distfiles, they rely on git
tags automatic
2010/7/19 Doug Barton :
>
> We have already had the discussion about this issue and we're not going to
> be creating ports that download random files from VCS repos. So yes, the
> person/team who is responsible for the port will have to provide a tarball
> of a known-good version. But that's comple
2010/8/30 Anonymous :
> Bapt writes:
>
> We can as well use Lua tables to store package database. Their syntax is
> close to JSON.
>
> Besides, I think it's better to divorce ports from base so that pkg_*
> tools can evolve faster and are not limited to dependencies from base.
> The only thing we'
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:34:58AM -0700, David Forsythe wrote:
> Eh, why didn't this thread spring up before summer of code got under
> way (or during the many weeks it was running)?
>
I was expecting for your reply :)
Sorry I didn't launch this thread before that because I didn't get enough spa
>
> Before and during the summer it would have been pretty simple because
> I was working on git and hg. At the end of the summer I decided to
> move over to p4 until I have at least the entire current pkg system
> supported (and then I'll probably move the project back over to a git
> repo).
I t
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:09:04 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
Hi!
I built LibreOffice 3.4.2 and was not a problem. It works but it
doesn't open
anymore word doc files. I made a doc file with a previous version of
LibreOffice but 3.4.2 doesn't open and I got an error:
General Error
General input/output error
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:06:21 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Heino Tiedemann wrote on 25.08.2011 01:57:
Hi,
whats the difference between libreoffice-legacy and libreoffice?
Freshports says: "Add libreoffice-legacy port for those with
problems
upgrading"
??
What doas the legacy ports, wa
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:20:05 +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:05:09 +,
Baptiste Daroussin a écrit :
Hello,
Yes building libreoffice with java option in an UTF8 environement is
known to fail there is nothing I found to workaround that :(
As it uses Ant to build
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:36:42PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> He there.
>
> I'm finally finished the work of eliminating databases/py-pysqlite2x
> consumers. I mean this obsoleted ports:
>
> databases/py-pysqlite20
> databases/py-pysqlite21
> databases/py-pysqlite22
> databases/py-pysql
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:07:26AM -0400, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> I would like to apply this patch
> (http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer/patches/speling.diff) which fixes
> a few spelling mistakes in the COMMENT field for some
> unmaintained ports:
>
> games/qudos
> editors/ne
> misc/ftdi-eeprom
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:49:48AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi,
> Reference:
> > From: "Julian H. Stacey"
> > Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:07:40 +0200
> > Message-id: <201109020107.p8217efj089...@fire.js.berklix.net>
>
> I wrote:
> > Microsoft must grin at all
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:04:01PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > http://pkgin.net/
> [...]
> > > pkgin is known to work and have been tested under the following platforms
> [...]
> > So, what do you actually mean by this?
>
> Probably just this: What about trying to port pkgin for FreeB
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:52:35PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 5 September 2011 15:16, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> > 2011-09-05 15:51, Chris Rees skrev:
> >>
> >> On 5 Sep 2011 14:45, "Leslie Jensen" wrote:
> >>> ===> libreoffice-3.4.3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.14.1 -
> >>
> >> found
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:11:33PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Baptiste Daroussin (b...@freebsd.org):
>
> > > Looks like it may be related to this commit:
> > >
> > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/libreoffice/files/
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:54:16AM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Leslie Jensen (les...@eskk.nu):
>
> > checking for dbopen in -ldb4... no
> > checking for __db185_open in -ldb4... no
> > configure: error: db not installed or functional
>
>
> Looks as if you need to install one of d
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:51:06PM +0300, George Liaskos wrote:
> >> There seems to be failures the installed version<4.4, not sure about that
> >> yet.
> >>
> >> I'm pondering to modify the USE_BDB to force 4.4+ but I need more testings
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Bapt
>
> I vote for removing --with-
>
> checking for dbopen in -ldb4... no
> checking for __db185_open in -ldb4... no
> configure: error: db not installed or functional
> ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
> Please report the problem to off...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the
> "/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:04:16PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> lini...@freebsd.org wrote on 07.09.2011 10:33:
> >
> > portname: databases/postgresql-plpython
> > description:A module for using Python to write SQL functions
> > maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
> > depr
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:19:26PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
> > Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> >> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
> >>>
> No, you don't hit the limitation
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:30:52PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-ports.
>
> I notice, that many software projects are hosted on social DVCS
> hostings nowadays.
>
> Other common "feature" among them is absence of "official" tarballs
> for versions. I don't say, that ALL proje
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:24:37PM +0100, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote:
>
>
> > The main problem with that is: we have no way to keep a valid sum of the
> > distfiles if it is autogenerated (in particular with github) and this sum is
> > really important.
>
>
> With github this fortunately is a non-is
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:53:20PM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I moved all my servers (about 40) to the pkgng (new generation)
> package/port
> system, and I can say that it is amazing... it is not yet finish, and
> have some
> minor "issues", but works very well, and is li
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:16:19PM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
> Sergio wrote:
>
> >I moved all my servers (about 40) to the pkgng (new generation)
> >package/port
> >system, and I can say that it is amazing... it is not yet finish, and
> >have some
> >minor "issues", but works very well, and is l
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:38AM +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:17 +0400
> Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>
> > Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > CCd eadler@ as he did last commit.
> > >
> > > When I'm trying update x11/xbitmaps x11/xtrans
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:36:14AM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
>
> The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
> similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
> altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
>
Thanks you very mu
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 12:55:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> I'm on 9-current r225756 amd64. Since the latest version of libreoffice
> was committed I always get stuck with cppunittest pegging the cpu at
> 100% and never completing. I've tried removing the port and letting
> libreoffice reinstall
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 09:12:31PM +0200, Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
> On 04.10.2011 06:10, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 10/03/2011 07:32, Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
> >
> >> I have the same problem (9.0 BETA3 amd64)
> >>
> >> When I set libreoffice's DEBUG option, the build (`make`) does
> >> complete.
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:27:12AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 8 October 2011 10:53, wrote:
> > lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> >
> >> portname: net-mgmt/portmon
> >> deprecated because: No more public distfiles
> >
> > I was able to fetch it earlier today:
> >
> > $ ( cd /usr/ports/net-
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:15:00AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> As crees@ suggested, I'm sending an email to ports@ about this.
>
> What really bothers me when I use the FreeBSD Ports tree on one of my
> systems, is that the behaviour of dealing with services is quite
> inconsistent.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:50:12PM +0100, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I need help to solve this. Has anyone seen this error?
>
> Thanks
>
> /Leslie
>
>
>
>
>
> [ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libswfb.so
> [ build DEP ] LNK:Library/libmswordfb.so
> [ build LOG ] sw
> sw deliver
> deliver -- v
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:43:25PM -0800, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I noticed the following in the commit log:
> %
> % Modified files:
> %.MOVED
> %develMakefile
> %graphics Makefile
> % Removed files:
> %devel/soup
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn?
> If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored.
> I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile
> (via my
> FreeBSD account).
>
>
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:40:02AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> [ Adding port mainter to Cc: ]
>
> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 17:15:17 +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
> > The recently updated port devel/yajl is not building due to the lack of
> > a tarrball:
> >
> > => lloyd-yajl-2.0.1-f4b2b1a.tar.gz doe
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >
> > Or that they simply quit doing that and instead print a message like "Port
> > X is
> > deinstalled but it may have some processes running, please do Y and/or Z to
> >
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:09:09AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 02/12/2011 21:55 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>>
> &
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:25:25PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 13:18, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:09:09AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 02/12/2011 21:55 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> >>> On Fri, Dec 02, 201
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 08:00:05AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
> > portname: misc/gtkfind
> > description:The program to use to have to remember all the options
> > to find(1)
> > maintainer: po...@freebsd.org
> >
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:10:57PM -0500, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> Dear All ,
>
>
> In the new PkgNG :
>
> https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/pkg/add.c
>
>
> the following statement is written :
>
> if (geteuid() != 0) {
> warnx("adding packages can only
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:13:19PM -0500, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:10:57PM -0500, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > > Dear All ,
> > >
> > >
> > > I
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 09:10:52AM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> (I posted this to -office but I would've CC'd -ports too.)
>
> Hello;
>
> I think we should have a port the new fonts that the Google
> Chrome OS developers have made to replace the so-called
> Liberation fonts:
>
> http://chromest
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:18:09PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Alexander, guys,
>
> are there boost 1.48.0 ports available in any form?
> Patches for testing, alternative repo, etc.
>
> Thank you.
There have been people saying they were working on it, but I don't remember who.
maybe sunpoet
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:33:05AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 20/01/2012 00:44 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:18:09PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>
> >> Alexander, guys,
> >>
> >> are there boost 1.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:22:24PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/01/2012 19:18 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > I have written this myself: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/boost-1.48.diff
> > and I need testers for it.
>
> Baptiste,
>
> it seems t
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:05:54AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/01/2012 23:25 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
> > I agree this was a fast patching to be able to use it for libreoffice, we
> > should for have a closer look at it.
>
> And, just in case, what I did
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
1/ Why pkgng?
Our current pkg_install tools are showing their age, are hard to maintain,
and they lack features:
- missing metadata
- no upgrade support
- no repository sup
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:43:58AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
> Hi Baptiste,
>
> This looks great!
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> >
> > Sample output of pkg info:
> >
> > $ pkg info -f libreoffice:
> > Name
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:21:37AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> No pkg query can't do this, but this would be a nice addition (something
> > like
> > raw output for info or query) I do like the idea, please
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:16:00PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 1/30/12 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
> > ports tree (disabled by default).
> >
> > 1/ Why p
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:27:20AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2012 00:52:25 Alberto Villa wrote:
> > On Monday 30 January 2012 23:34:59 Yuri Pankov wrote:
> > > The patch seems to have typos in it (usr_pkgng):
> > > https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/ports/portmaste
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:09:47PM +0100, Marco Steinbach wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
> > ports tree (disabled by default).
>
> [...]
>
&
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:23:35AM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> On 30.01.2012 16:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
> > ports tree (disabled by default).
> >
> > 1/ Why pkgng?
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:34:42PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
> > ports tree (disabled by default).
>
> Are there any i386 remote repos
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:08:46AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:39:30PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > to use pkgng:
> >
> > echo WITH_PKGNG=yes >> /etc/make.conf
> > make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg install clean
>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 07:51:08AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Julien Laffaye writes:
>
> > >> You didn't run pkg2ng.
> >
> > > thanks again. I missed that too. Is this somewhere
> > > in pkg man pages? I didn't see it.
> >
> > It is a one time operation when you are coming from the old
> >
As said in the first announcement there will be lots of beta release before rc
and then stable
the second one is now out with the following changes:
* update bundled sqlite to 3.7.10
* add -n to pkg create to avoid packing already packed packages
* Fix rc script handling
* safer sbuf usage (this f
Sorry pkg add was broken in beta2 this release fixes it.
Changes:
* fix pkg add (it is been broken during beta2 sorry about that)
* fix manifest emitter: now really emit the pkg-message in message no more
description
* add %M to pkg query to show messages
* concat all pkg-messages and show it on
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:15:34PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 10 February 2012 09:51, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > As said in the first announcement there will be lots of beta release before
> > rc
> > and then stable
> >
> > the second one is n
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:08:28PM -0200, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> Em Sáb, 2012-02-11 às 00:38 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin escreveu:
>
> > Sorry pkg add was broken in beta2 this release fixes it.
> >
> > Changes:
> > * fix pkg add (it is been broken during bet
beta6 is now out with the following changes:
* pkg register: now run inside a transaction, this speeds up things a lot
(thanks avg)
* pkg version: -v now print name-version to match behaviour of legacy
pkg_version
* pkg register: fix flatsize calculation
* new pkg-updating(1) man page (thanks be
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:07:18PM +0100, Beat Gätzi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> pkgng support for tinderbox (written by bapt@) is ready and is looking for
> some review and testers. The patch is against tinderbox HEAD:
>
> http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/tinderbox-pkgng.patch
>
> It also needs a database change
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:53:42PM -0200, Renato Botelho wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > beta6 is now out with the following changes:
> >
> > * pkg register: now run inside a transaction, this speeds up things a lot
> > (thanks
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:04:48PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/15/2012 14:27, George Liaskos wrote:
> > Thank you for the great work, pkg-updating.1 should be added in the MAN1
> > because pkg is currently falling under tinderbox.
>
> Shouldn't stuff like updating packages be in sbin & man s
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:50:38AM +0100, Beat Gätzi wrote:
> 2012/2/18 George Liaskos :
> > There seems to be an issue with most of the x11-font ports, fonts.dir
> > and fonts.cache are not handled correctly.
> >
> > http://tinderbox.cybertron.gr/index.php?action=failed_buildports&build=9.0-AMD64-
Hi all,
this mail is also sent to ports@ has the problem we have with nvidia-driver
might also occur elsewhere and we need a general fix for that.
First what is the failure: nvidia driver overwrite libGL.so provided by another
package which is broken by design because the package database isn't c
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:35:02AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:36:08PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
> > One of the issues with 'alternatives' implementations is that they are
> > not selectable per-user (including non superuser).
> >
> > In this particular case (libGL),
On 23.02.2012 08:34, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Thu, 23 Feb 2012
08:21:33 +0100):
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:35:02AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:36:08PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
> One of the issues with 'alte
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:56:22PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote at 11:28 + on Feb 23, 2012:
> > On 23.02.2012 08:34, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > > Do you havea list of packages which overzrite something, respectively
> > > do you hav
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:18:25PM -0800, Ade Lovett wrote:
> On 2/23/2012 13:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Another solution could be to add an entry (and drop it in deinstallation to
> > libmap.conf) when installing the nvidia driver, in that case installing it
> > ad
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:18:25PM -0800, Ade Lovett wrote:
> On 2/23/2012 13:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Another solution could be to add an entry (and drop it in deinstallation to
> > libmap.conf) when installing the nvidia driver, in that case installing it
> > ad
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:19:44PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 1:15 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Here is a patch to add support for includedir keyword to libmap.conf so
> > that we
>
> I think this is overly complicated, and not generally useful. It also
&g
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:19:15PM +, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 03/01/12 07:18, Beat Gätzi wrote:
> > This one is already fixed:
> > http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/tinderbox-pkgng-v2.patch
>
> D'oh. Thanks!
>
> What to do about failures of these types ?
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollu
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:47:10AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:34:12AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 02/28/2012 14:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Fe
Hi,
We just released beta8 of pkgng, it comes with the usual fixes and some new
features:
pkg set is a new subcommand to modify the content of the local package database,
currently only modifying -a [01] the status wether the package as been installed
as a dependency or direct can be done.
pkg c
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:56:17PM +0300, Alexander Churanov wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've read the conversation on ports/156253 ("Update devel/boost-* from
> 1.45 to 1.46.1") and decided to share current status of my work.
>
> I have a patch for updating Boost to 1.48.0.
> http://alexanderchuranov.co
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote:
> On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffice
> > maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 and
> > has
> > many improv
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:08:52PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 18:47, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> > On 03/16/2012 08:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> >>> In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is
> >>> simpler than
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 06:18:16PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:54:36PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> > On 25 Mar 2012 13:51, "Radim Kolar" wrote:
> > >
> > > please do not remove this pgsql branch. its newest branch using old
> > postgresql-contrib full text search
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:11:33PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> On 03/27/12 21:42, Da Rock wrote:
> > I've been hunting down some info on why this is failing, but all I
> > keep running into is the previous versions failings... :(
> >
> > I'm building libreoffice on 9.0-Release amd64, and I'm getting b
Hi,
On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-beta9
- changes:
* query -f has been replaced by query -F when querying a package (file) for
consistency with pkg info
* fix autoremove recursion
* pkg set -o oldorigin:neworigin allow the user to modify the origin of a
packages (use
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:12:42PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 03/30/2012 01:10 PM, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:41:21AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Should this be in ../lang/urweb or in ../www/urweb ?
> doesn't install anything in WWWDIR, and submitter suggests this should
> be in ../lang.
>
> cat pkg-descr
>
> Ur is a programming language in the tradition of ML and Haske
Hi,
Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by
upstream since 2008.
on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be able to
run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which already have a
newer version using php5 in the ports tr
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> On 2012-Apr-10, 11:20, Marcelo Araujo wrote:
> > 2012/4/10 Pietro Cerutti
> > >
> > >
> > > I might agree on that. But how is a DEPRECATED port better than a BROKEN
> > > one in this regard?
> > >
> > >
> > In my point of view, no m
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 08:59:30PM +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 09:07 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> > On 4/11/2012 8:16 AM, Wayne Sierke wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 13:47 -0700, Greg Byshenk wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wro
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:21:24PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On ia64 r231193M:
>
> # pkg audit -F
> http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/auditfile.tbz 100% 76KB 75.8KB/s
> 75.8KB/s 00:00
> 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found.
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:46:04PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> # pkg check -a
> usage: pkg check [-yadsr]
>pkg check [-ygxXdsr]
>
> For more information see 'pkg help check'.
> #
>
> According to the man page, this
> should've worked, by processing
> all packages.
-a is for proc
1 - 100 of 1241 matches
Mail list logo
