Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > I normally run the command > # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I > got the following output: > > diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> I normally run the command > >> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > >> before running 'portupgrade -

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > > Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

2006-07-12 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:34:22PM -0500, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > Dejan Lesjak wrote: > >Hello, > > > >There were a couple of debates already concerning /usr/X11R6 as prefix for > >X11 ports and a bunch of other ports that currently by default install > >there. Quite some people were, w

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

2006-07-12 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:48:39PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote: > Those man pages for whatis are pretty radically > different in size. Maybe they are mergeable, but > there's going to be a fair amount of work doing that > for all possible conflicts. They are generated files see makewhatis(1). There wi

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

2006-07-12 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:59:08PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 19:56 -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:48:39PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote: > > > Those man pages for whatis are pretty radically > > > different in size. Ma

Re: What the hell is going on with mplayer?

2006-07-13 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Heino Tiedemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 13 Jul > 2006 15:23:07 +0200): > > >I just wanted to so a simple ??portupgrade mplayer-gtk??, and see what > >habens: > > > > > >** Detected a package name change: mplaye

Re: Installation directory best practices

2006-07-13 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 07:36:19PM +0100, Shaun Amott wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:27:20PM +0330, Babak Farrokhi wrote: > > I wonder if there is any particular guideline for installation of web based > > application (the ports which install web pages, like www/wordpress, > > www/serendipity

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

2006-07-14 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:33:22PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > On Friday 14 July 2006 08:58, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> What's the gain? > > > > I believe I mentioned some of gains in first mail. There is also the > > benefit > > of less divergence to upstreams as ./confi

Re: makewhatis from ports

2006-07-19 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:52:26AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> I've got a Makefile where I install man pages int PREFIX/man/man1 and the > >> ports system nicely compresses them, but it does not make them available > >> for whatis. Should I

Re: Checksum mismatch for print/teTeX-texmf

2006-07-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:24:17AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Running portupgrade with current ports from cvs, I got this failure - > print/teTeX-texmf (teTeX-texmf-3.0_3) (checksum mismatch). I also had > checksum mismatchs for multimedia/mplayer-skins, but I was able to get > past that by r

Re: extract both bz2 and gz files from distfiles

2006-08-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Hi! > > > We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz > distfiles. As for 5.x+ extracting is gone automagically. But not at > 4.x. Well, at 4.x extracting may be done for example, by using > USE_BZIP2 knob and d

Re: extract both bz2 and gz files from distfiles

2006-08-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:37:25 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > > We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz > > > distfiles. As for 5.x+ extract

Re: extract both bz2 and gz files from distfiles

2006-08-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:56:18PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Boris Samorodov p??e v ?t 08. 08. 2006 v 00:24 +0400: > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > > On Mon,

Re: extract both bz2 and gz files from distfiles

2006-08-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 05:03:57PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:24:49AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > &g

Re: extract both bz2 and gz files from distfiles

2006-08-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:20:55PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Brooks Davis p??e v po 07. 08. 2006 v 16:06 -0500: > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:56:18PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > Boris Samorodov p??e v ?t 08. 08. 2006 v 00:24 +0400: > > > > On Mon, 7 Aug 20

Re: using svn to fetch for ports (yet again!)

2009-11-04 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 08:23:02PM +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: > I have a small patch to bsd.port.mk which would allow a port to > replace its do-fetch with a svn export of a /specific revision/ of a > remote repo. > > I know there have been some attempts at trying this before and from > what I've b

Re: using svn to fetch for ports (yet again!)

2009-11-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:17:10PM +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: > > I'd much rather see this used as something that reduced the amount of > > code required for maintainers to build tarballs from SVN. ?For example > > something similar in spirit to what I've done in devel/llvm-devel. ?That > > means mi

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

2009-11-09 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 07:07:25PM +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:31:57 +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: > > > I was hoping to get a bit more of a response to a recent posting of mine > > with regard to using svn to fetch files for ports My proposal: > > http://www.mail-archive.co

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

2009-11-09 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:28:52PM -0800, Xin LI wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Eitan Adler wrote: > > I was hoping to get a bit more of a response to a recent posting of > > mine with regard to using svn to fetch files for ports > > My proposal: > > http://www.mail-

Re: squeezecenter 7.3.2 no longer starts with latest ports

2009-12-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:24:55AM +, Mark Knight wrote: > In message <91b92520912021328j34373653r838ba135a41f5...@mail.gmail.com>, > Sandra Kachelmann writes > >I even removed the whole database and performed a complete rebuild: > > > >$ portupgrade -rf squeezeboxserver > > > >This port is br

Re: [RFC] Tools/ script for automatically making a tar out of svn sources

2009-12-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:27:58PM +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: > The attached script is designed to work with the 20+ ports that > currently have to resort to hacks to automatically figure out the head > version, checkout from svn, make a tar file, and then upload the file > to freefall. > > It is b

Re: audio/squeezeboxserver still broken

2010-07-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 12:45:49PM -0700, George Hartzell wrote: > Emanuel Haupt writes: > > George Hartzell wrote: > > > Emanuel Haupt writes: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > The current audio/squeezeboxserver port is still broken for me. I > > > > just built a package set with an up to dat

Re: sysutils/sge6[012]: Sun Grid Engine - still broklen due to utmpx?

2011-09-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:04:49AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port > sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx. > > My department uses this GRID engine on Linux and since a long time I > wish to use it also on FreeBSD. I've not had a dece

Re: sysutils/sge6[012]: Sun Grid Engine - still broklen due to utmpx?

2011-09-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:58:33AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:04:49AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port > > sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx. > > > > My department uses th

Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk

2011-12-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree > until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang > needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then > that's fine. We d

Re: Creation of users in ports

2011-12-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 07:54:07PM +, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm at a loss as to how to restore functionality for creating (or > using) customised users in ports. For example, using the old method > (pkg-install scripts) many ports allowed the user to change the > username used for t

Re: update of security/pssh

2010-12-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:24:27PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: > Hello, > > According to : > http://www.theether.org/pssh/ > > parallel-ssh (pssh) is now maintained on > http://code.google.com/p/parallel-ssh/ by Andrew McNabb. Current > version is 2.1.1. > > Would you have time to look into a m

Re: Proposal moving *spell dicts to ports/textproc/*spell/dicts

2010-12-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 03:16:05PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > >> As I said some weeks ago I personally don't like much the use of > > >> ports/{french,chinese,whatever}/ directories. I saw that openbsd > > >> created sub directories in the aspell port. I think this is a r

Re: FreeBSD Port: squeezeboxserver-7.5.3, build okay but fails to start.

2011-04-27 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:15:07AM -0700, spotter wrote: > I am having the exact same problem with a brand new FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE > install and a fresh squeezeboxserver (v7.5.3) port build. > (Slimserver was working fine under FreeBSD 6.2, until I tried to get > miniDLNA working, as well, for a Bl

Re: build failure of ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7

2011-05-24 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:19:40AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On ia64 and sparc64, both current, I get > a build failure of ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7 > when updating from 3.1.1_6: > > ===> Building for ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7 > make: cannot open Makefile. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop

Re: build failure of ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7

2011-05-24 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:14:54PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:37:42AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:19:40AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > On ia64 and sparc64, both current, I get > > > a build fail

Re: build failure of ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7

2011-05-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:33:10PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:46:42AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:14:54PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:37:42AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: >

Re: Lightspark port and LLVM bug

2011-06-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:58:30AM -0500, Rusty Nejdl wrote: > I might be interested in taking over maintainership of this port but at > present, this will not compile. I have submitted a PR for an updated > version of libxml++26 but also, the versions of LLVM (including -devel) > both contain

Re: Lightspark port and LLVM bug

2011-06-16 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:52:10AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:58:30AM -0500, Rusty Nejdl wrote: > > I might be interested in taking over maintainership of this port but at > > present, this will not compile. I have submitted a PR for an updated > &

Re: [CFT] Likewise-open preliminary port

2011-06-24 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:09:23AM +0200, Ganael Laplanche wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Over the past few weeks, I've been working on a Likewise-open [1] port and am > starting to get something useable. > > Technically speaking, the port builds fine on x86 and amd64 platforms (gcc- > only ATM) and

Re: HELP needed by experienced porter for simple review

2007-12-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:22:06PM +0100, GP wrote: >>> rc.conf >>> It's a shame that I can't use a script placed in /files to change rc.conf >>> during install/ >>> deinstall. I really liked that. But i guess I will settle with a dull >>> pkg-message at the >>> end, like the rest of you... >>> >>

Re: Renaming a Port

2007-12-13 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:31:01AM -0500, Steven Kreuzer wrote: > Greetings- > > I am the maintainer of the mysqltoolkit port. Recently, the project > underwent a name change and is now maatkit. > The application has also undergone some updates so I would like to update > the port to the latest

Re: sysutils/lsof cannot fetch distfile ;;

2008-01-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 02:39:21PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 12:56:20PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > I was talking about GETTING the distfile onto the freebsd.org mirrors. > > I'm working on this now. I've never had to do something like this > before but from what

Re: Weird portlint errors

2008-02-21 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:43:32AM -0800, comperr wrote: > I am working on a new port for pastebinit (command line pastebin) and > when I run portlint I get a weird error that my portname and such > don't exist and there are nion comments in the comment part - but I > know these error are wrong. P

Re: Weird portlint errors

2008-02-21 Thread Brooks Davis
windows box. Please run dos2unix on it or recreate it in an appropriate editor. Then it will work. Also, please don't top-post when posting to freebsd-lists. -- Brooks > > On Feb 21, 11:00 am, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:43:32AM -0

Re: FreeBSD Port: slimserver-6.5.4

2008-03-24 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:03:47AM -0400, Andy Rossmeissl wrote: > Hi Brooks, > > Are you planning on doing a port of SqueezeCenter (f/k/a SlimServer 7)? Yes. I've started work on it, but a lot has changed and I've been on vacation and will be traveling next week so I don't currently have an ETA

Re: lzma (Re: HEADS UP: upgrading ImageMagick to 6.4.0-6)

2008-04-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:35:30PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > 15 ??? 2008 10:21 ??, Brooks Davis ?? : > > Sadly, the author's licensing terms will limit the adoption of lzma. > > The BSD license is well established as the most restrictive accept

Re: lzma (Re: HEADS UP: upgrading ImageMagick to 6.4.0-6)

2008-04-21 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:05:42PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:07:54PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:35:30PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > 15 ??? 2008 10:21 ??, Brooks Davis ?? : > >

Re: lzma (Re: HEADS UP: upgrading ImageMagick to 6.4.0-6)

2008-04-22 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:34:39PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 02:42:24PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > That's well hidden (DOC/lzam.txt in the tarball). Someone > > should produce some sort of lzma-lite distribution that only > > does th

Re: Building new port, don't want to run as root

2008-04-28 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:27:44PM +0300, Walter Venable wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> I take it you're talking about a daemon process and you want to have the >> rc.subr scripts start it as another user than root? That's fairly simple. >> >> To make rc.subr start a process using a different

Re: Problem with recent MOVED file and portupgrade

2008-04-30 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 04:36:52PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > I get a MOVED file error when i try to use any of the portupgrade apps > with a recently cvsed ports tree. Try again. I committed an error earlier today and fixed it about an hour ago. IMO, portupgrade should make some attempt to ig

Re: rc.d startup script problem

2008-05-14 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 02:35:54PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > This script will not start if you change the name or location of the conf > file in /etc/rc.conf. For some reason it's not parsing /etc/rc.conf. > Anyone know why? > > #!/bin/sh > > # PROVIDE: sancp_agent > # REQUIRE: DAEMON > #

Re: porting of SVN-only software

2008-05-16 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:08:25PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Wesley Shields escribi?: >> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:54:09PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >>> Suppose there is a project that does not produce any official snapshots >>> or releases of its source-code, keeps all sources in SVN

Re: hier 7 question

2008-05-18 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 08:20:03PM -0400, Marc Spitzer wrote: > Hello, > > I am porting ATF, http://www.netbsd.org/~jmmv/atf/, a unit testing > framework for C, C++ and Shell. The thing is is that it installs a > bunch of self tests in ${PREFIX}/tests/atf. Is this the right place > for it? From

Re: audio/squeezecenter: .tgz not on Freebsd.org (is on slimdevices.com); perl probs

2008-06-13 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 02:50:51PM -0400, Chris Shenton wrote: > The port tries to find the .tgz on FreeBSD.org only, but it does not > exist. I found it on slimdevices -- same MD5, SHA256, SIZE: > > http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads/SqueezeCenter_v7.0.0/squeezecenter-7.0-noCPAN.tgz There's a

Re: audio/squeezecenter: .tgz not on Freebsd.org (is on slimdevices.com); perl probs

2008-06-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 09:19:35PM +0100, Rob MacGregor wrote: > Chris Shenton unleashed the infinite monkeys on 13/06/2008 19:50 producing: >> The port tries to find the .tgz on FreeBSD.org only, but it does not >> exist. I found it on slimdevices -- same MD5, SHA256, SIZE: >> >> http://www.slim

Re: audio/squeezecenter: .tgz not on Freebsd.org (is on slimdevices.com); perl probs

2008-06-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 05:46:59PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 09:19:35PM +0100, Rob MacGregor wrote: > > Chris Shenton unleashed the infinite monkeys on 13/06/2008 19:50 producing: > >> The port tries to find the .tgz on FreeBSD.org only, but it does

Re: audio/squeezecenter: .tgz not on Freebsd.org (is on slimdevices.com); perl probs

2008-06-16 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:05:31PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 05:46:59PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 09:19:35PM +0100, Rob MacGregor wrote: > > > Chris Shenton unleashed the infinite monkeys on 13/06/2008 19:50 > > >

Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt*

2012-06-11 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:45:40AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 6/11/12 4:31 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > Dunno what (if anything) they are currently good for, but it seems > > that, at a minimum, the PORTVERSION and/or MASTER_SITES -- and the > > pkg-descr -- need to be updat

Re: Can we please just remove the old Makefile headers?

2012-08-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > The old Makefile headers, ala: > > # New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x > # Date created: 27 January 2012 > # Whom: dougb > # > # $FreeBSD: head/dns/bind99/Makefile

Re: www/libxul: fails to compile with CLANG and fails to install with GCC

2012-09-19 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:50:45PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > I already filed a PR (ports/171566) regarding the CLANG compilation > issue, but since CLANG is a troublemaker for several ports, I also used > USE_GCC=4.6 to compile the port www/libxul and this works - but fails > then installing with

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

2012-10-18 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:52:05PM +0200, John Marino wrote: > On 10/17/2012 14:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > I don't know much about this, I just know that current is going to use > > bmake, > > and the only incompatibility I have spotted so far from our make to bmake > > is the > > :L be

Re: git checkout branch in makefile

2018-07-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 08:19:13PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > On 9. Jul 2018, at 19:34, blubee blubeeme wrote: > > > > Is it possible to do a git checkout of a specific branch in a ports > > makefile? > > > > How would I go about checking out a particular branch from a github project

Re: sphinx-build not found

2019-01-18 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:03:54PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: > Greetings, > > Quite a few ports are now being skipped by the not unheard of > problem with "sphinx-build not found". Including llvm6 and 7. > I've checked UPDATING and google, but no hints, other than this > problem has happene

LLVM 7.1.0: how to proceed?

2019-02-06 Thread Brooks Davis
LLVM 7.1.0 will be release shortly and contains a single fix which breaks the LLVM Libra ABI in order to fix an incompatibility with GCC 8.2. A bug describing the issue is at https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39427. My current plan is: - Copy devel/llvm70 to devel/llvm71 and update. - Perfo

Re: devel/llvm80 requires many python 2.7 ports?

2019-07-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:57:29PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I just went to build llvm80 after discovering that I could not install the > package without moving from the drfault samba48 back to the deprecated > samba47. > > When I try to build the port, I get: > Upgrade llvm80-8.0.0_2 to llvm8

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

2019-08-06 Thread Brooks Davis
I'd prefer to disable this dependency. There's a knob that worked in the 8.0 timeframe, but the lit build now autodetects z3 when it is present and I've failed to find a knob to disable it. For now, the easy workaround is probably to disable options LIT. We could make that the default on non-LLV

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

2019-08-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:59:21PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2019-Aug-6, at 09:55, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > I'd prefer to disable this dependency. There's a knob that worked in > > the 8.0 timeframe, but the lit build now autodetects z3 when it

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

2019-08-07 Thread Brooks Davis
ark Millard wrote: > > > > > On 2019-Aug-6, at 19:08, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:59:21PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2019-Aug-6, at 09:55, Brooks Davis wrote: > >>&

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

2019-08-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:17:14PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:22:52PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > [I found something known to be missing in the > > in at least some versions of > > llvm/cmake/modules/CrossCompile.cmake that messes > >

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

2019-08-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:55:04AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2019-Aug-7, at 11:02, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:17:14PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:22:52PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >>>

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

2019-08-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 01:42:26PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2019-Aug-7, at 12:56, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:55:04AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2019-Aug-7, at 11:02, Brooks Davis wrote: &

Re: Checking you the maintainer of a port?

2019-11-27 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:05:56PM -0700, Janky Jay, III wrote: > Hello, > > On 11/27/19 2:03 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > > I thought that the maintainer of a port was listed somewhere in the files > > at user/ports//portbase/ but evidently not. What is the easiest way > > to find out, sitting in conso

Re: devel/llvm80 port on 12.1

2019-12-12 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 04:42:07PM +0100, Lars Engels wrote: > I'm trying reduce the size of the NomadBSD image and the biggest > installed package is devel/llvm80 with 848 MiB. > llvm80 is a dependency of graphics/mesa-dri which is needed for > x11-servers/xorg-server. > > Looking at the llvm ver

Re: amd64->{armv7,aarc64} cross builds of devel/llvm10 (via poudriere-devel): failed in package stage for missing libarcher* files

2020-02-19 Thread Brooks Davis
Fixed in r526532. Thanks for the hint that it was in OPENMP. -- Brooks On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:19:26PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2020-Feb-17, at 09:56, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2020-Feb-17, at 09:53, Mark Millard wrote: > > > >> [The native arm64 build worked fine. But the cross

Re: llvm80-8.0.1_3 needs Python 3.6 at least, but 2.7 was specified.

2020-02-27 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 08:44:59AM -0800, Chris wrote: > I'm testing modifications of ports I maintain in > a jail. I have nothing in make.conf(5) except > DEVELOPER=true > But I get messages regarding python versions like: > llvm80-8.0.1_3 needs Python 3.6 at least, but 2.7 was specified. > But I

Re: Poudriere make.conf documentation question

2020-04-17 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 09:42:51AM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote: > Hello, > > The Handbook says: > "The system make.conf and this new file are combined at build time to > create the make.conf used by the build jail." > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-poudriere.html > > The poudriere man

Re: Fwd: AFFECTS: users of devel/kuya

2020-04-23 Thread Brooks Davis
Thanks for the report, I make that typo all the time. Thanks also to bapt@ for fixing. -- Brooks On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 08:16:59AM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > Should that be devel/kyua? > > Not to be nitpicking, but someone might try grep on UPDATING :) > > bye > av.

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:48:34AM -0400, Greg Veldman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 03:43:38PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > The real question is: Will we design things in a way that we expect ports > > tree users to always install git and its dependencies on their system or > > not (long

Re: devel/llvm11 failed to build

2020-12-01 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:20:00AM +0900, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote: > Hi, all > > I've changed Makefile so as to include *mmintrin.h as > follows: > > --- /home/kiri/work/ports/head/devel/llvm11/Makefile 2020-11-09 > 12:30:07.0 +0900 > +++ llvm11/Makefile 2020-11-29 17:12:58.544495000

Re: Any plan to fix ports git main history compatibility with old GitHub master?

2021-04-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 05:33:08PM -0300, Eric Turgeon wrote: > Today when trying to sync the GhostBSD ports tree with the FreeBSD ports > tree, I found out the main branch history is not compatible with the old > GitHub master. > > Any plan to migrate to main with hold git history as we had with

Re: Large builds with poudriere

2021-05-20 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:09:32PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on > Thu May 20 21:37:28 UTC 2021 : > > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:48 PM Mark Millard wrote: > > > > > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on > > > Thu May 20 19:21:24 UTC 2021 : >

Re: Dropbox on FreeBSD

2012-12-20 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:07:05AM -0500, Jerry wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:45:13 + > Chris Rees articulated: > > > It needs porting to kevent. > > > > Someone may do it for payment, some may do it for fun, but no-one > > will do it for you until you learn some manners. > > > > Or you co

Re: llvm-3.2 tarball rerolled?

2013-01-14 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:26:40AM +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > On 2013-01-13 16:00, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2013-01-12 22:54, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > >> I'm seeing this size mismatch, any idea what it is about? > >> > >> root(itetcu)@it/SU >-SSH-> /usr/ports/devel/llvm [23:50:47] 0 > >

dropping maintainership of some ports

2013-01-24 Thread Brooks Davis
Due to a change of jobs I'm planning to drop maintainership of a number of ports I no longer use or have test systems for. If you would like to maintain them, please let me know: databases/nagios-check_postgres_replication net/openmpi net/pypvm net/vncreflector www/trac-addcomment www/trac-discus

Re: CLANG 3.3/LLVM 3.3 question regarding devel/llvm vs. devel/llvm33

2013-07-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:32:36AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > > No is 9.1-STABLE en route also equipted with CLANG 3.3, as it is with > CURRENT. The ports system still differs between the "standard" > devel/llvm, which is in fact LLVM 3.2 and devel/llvm33, which is then > LLVM 3.3. > > devel/llv

Re: llvm33 update

2013-10-17 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 05:57:02AM -0400, Ajtim wrote: > Hi! > > I tried to update llvm33-3.3_4 to llvm33-3.3_5 on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA1 but > I got an error: > > Compressing man pages > ===> Installing ldconfig configuration file > ===> Installing for llvm33-3.3_5 > ===> Checking if devel/ll

Re: devel/llvm33 Makefile

2013-10-30 Thread Brooks Davis
I've committed a fix. If you don't need the extra asserts you probably want to turn them off as they slow things down and break serveral llvm consumers. -- Brooks On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:15:16PM +, Cary wrote: > Hello, > > On 9.2-RELEASE llvm33-3.3_7 installation failed here: > > instal

Re: Integrating Custom Ports

2013-12-11 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:03:46PM -0500, Rick Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Kris Moore wrote: > > > On 12/10/2013 09:37, Rick Miller wrote: > > > > > > This is my first foray into Ports beyond just installing what is > > available. > > > So, just looking for some feedback fr

Re: powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT portmaster lang/clang36 gets error: llvm-build: error: invalid native target: 'powerpc64' (not in project)

2015-03-18 Thread Brooks Davis
It appears that I added powerpc64 (and several others) to the devel/llvm* ports version of this patch, but didn't do it for lang/clang*. I'll sync them up. -- Brooks On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 08:02:47PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > patch-utils_llvm-build_llvmbuild_main.py is missing a powerpc64 en

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

2015-07-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:45:53PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: > > Hi Olli and ports@, > > > > I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to > > request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for > > mail/postfix.

Re: Does OpenMP (iomp5) work for clang-devel?

2015-07-20 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:48:58PM -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote: > I can't seem to get this working and it appears not to emit code. I have > libiomp5 installed and I compile specifying: > > clang++-devel -fopenmp=libiomp5 ... > > And the compiler says: > > clang: warning: argument unused duri

Re: svn commit: r392851 - in head: . devel devel/libiomp5-devel devel/llvm-devel devel/llvm-devel/files lang/clang-devel lang/clang-devel/files

2015-07-24 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:40:10PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > Author: brooks > Date: Fri Jul 24 23:40:09 2015 > New Revision: 392851 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/392851 > > Log: > Mostly complete redo to the build of -devel LLVM ports: &

Re: Does OpenMP (iomp5) work for clang-devel?

2015-08-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:21:26PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 21/07/2015 18:06, Shane Ambler wrote: > > On 21/07/2015 10:59, Dennis Glatting wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 01:07 +, Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:48:58PM -0700, Dennis

Re: devel/llvm36/plist has 2 non existant files

2015-09-21 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:30:54AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi bro...@freebsd.org, > cc: po...@freebsd.org > > with current devel/llvm36 > FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #12135: Thu Sep > 17 14:54:15 CEST 2015 > j...@lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd

Re: devel/llvm36/plist has 2 non existant files

2015-09-22 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Brooks Davis wrote: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:21:30 + > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:30:54AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Hi

Re: devel/llvm36/plist has 2 non existant files

2015-09-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:18:48AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > >=20 > > > Brooks Davis wrote: Mon, 21

Re: llvm37 python3 problem

2015-10-12 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:38:57PM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Can't test the patch in the above link, cause the port ignores python > 3.4 and I don't want deinstall python 2.7. I've figured out how to reconfigure poudriere to be able to test this. Several other files need this sort of fi

Re: 9.3 to 10.2 migration, determining if clang is used

2015-10-13 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:13:11AM -0700, Patrick Powell wrote: > I just started doing a 9.3 to 10.2 migration of a bunch of applications > and discovered that some of the options used > to generate the applications were slightly different. I just know that > this has been covered before, but

Re: llvm37 python3 problem

2015-10-27 Thread Brooks Davis
n work around this by disabling the LLDB option when building. -- Brooks > 12 octobre 2015 19:50 "Brooks Davis" a ??crit: > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:38:57PM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > > > >> Can't test the patch in the above link, cause the por

Re: error upgrading graphics/dri port "/usr/local/llvm36/bin/clang: not found"

2016-01-18 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 07:08:14PM +1100, Graham Menhennitt wrote: > Does anybody have any clues, please? > > Thanks, > Graham > > root@starker# uname -a > FreeBSD starker 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #17 r294103: Sun Jan > 17 13:26:05 AEDT 2016 > gfm@starker:/usr/obj/usr/data/FreeBS

Re: Pulling from github as a vendorized dependency in poudriere

2016-02-19 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 07:13:04AM -0500, Derek (freebsd lists) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm attempting to port a project over, and it is dependent on a > "vendorizing" program, which then pulls in the source of the > dependencies to build. (The final artifact is statically linked, > so there shouldn'

Re: [ports] cvs commit: ports/emulators/p-interp Makefile

2008-07-29 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:17:38PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > brooks 2008-07-29 17:17:30 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > emulators/p-interp Makefile > Log: > Fix the disk image MASTER_SITES. >- ftp.apple.asimov.net was r

Re: FreeBSD Port: squeezecenter-7.0.1_4

2008-08-11 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Kenny Lasse Hoff Levinsen wrote: > Hi! > > I'm sorry to bother, but i just wanted to ask when this port is gonna be > updated (it's 7.1 now)? > Know it's a simple app and i can just install it from sources (which is > perl, to make it even simpler), but

  1   2   >