Re: ports/146626: [PATCH] print/hplip3 gzip files curruption with USE_DOS2UNIX=yes

The following reply was made to PR ports/146626; it has been noted by GNATS. From: ch...@officialunix.com To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, am...@raisa.eu.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/146626: [PATCH] print/hplip3 gzip files curruption with USE_DOS2UNIX=yes Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 08:03:14 -0500

Re: ports/146626: [PATCH] print/hplip3 gzip files curruption with USE_DOS2UNIX=yes

The following reply was made to PR ports/146626; it has been noted by GNATS. From: ch...@officialunix.com To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/146626: [PATCH] print/hplip3 gzip files curruption with USE_DOS2UNIX=yes Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 08:57:24 -0500 This patch can be

Re: ports/146626: [PATCH] print/hplip3 gzip files curruption with USE_DOS2UNIX=yes

The following reply was made to PR ports/146626; it has been noted by GNATS. From: ch...@officialunix.com To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/146626: [PATCH] print/hplip3 gzip files curruption with USE_DOS2UNIX=yes Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 08:59:02 -0500 Yeap, the patch is

security/openssh-portable maintainer

this port, my skill set is not high enough to do it at least without some help. Failing that can someone help me with the freebed patches in the files dir to patch ok on openssh 5.6p1. Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

DRI build failing on 8.1-STABLE

1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg. It looks like a boo-boo in the code. This is from a freshly pulled down ports tree from this morning and with WITHOUT_NOUVEAU=yes in /etc/make.conf. Is there a patch in the works or do we need to let the Freedesktop folks know? Thanks, Chris

Make install fails for mail/thunderbird

Hello, I'm seeing this when doing a make install on mail/thunderbird (version 24): resource://gre/modules/devtools/Console.jsm resource://gre/modules/devtools/WebConsoleClient.jsm resource://gre/modules/devtools/dbg-server.jsm Traceback (most recent call last): File

multimedia/phonon build fails

Seeing this when I try to build: Generating moc_statesvalidator_p.cpp [ 3%] Built target phonon_automoc Scanning dependencies of target phonon make: don't know how to make /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtDeclarative.so. Stop *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error === Compilation failed

Re: Limitations of Ports System

always like to compile my own binaries etc. rather than using something thats precompiled and limited to how the compiler compiled it. Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe

Re: FreeBSD Port: security/clamav

On 04/03/07, ??/LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris wrote: [snip] this 90_3 now fixes the high cpu utilisation problems? Which problem do you refer? The update is to update it to 0.90.1 (from 0.90_3), but I have never encountered your problem so I can not tell much :-( Do you have any test

Re: FreeBSD Port: security/clamav

/109786; if you need milter you may also want PR/109792. Cheers, -- Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! this 90_3 now fixes the high cpu utilisation problems? Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

is pear broken?

/share/pear/peclcmd.php: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/pear. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Chris Chatzaras ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe

Port installation/upgrades issues

Today I have problem installing or upgrading ports like net-snmpd, faac, php. I get a common error for all these ports: make: cannot open Makefile. *** Error code 2 Anyone else having the same problem? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Port installation/upgrades issues

Yes some ports don't work, other ports work. I think problem is related to autoconf-2.16_2 which I upgrade today. Ports that don't work are net-snmpd, php5 and all php5-extensions, faac (tried to deinstall it and now I can't install it :/ ) At least I am not alone with that problem. * Chris

Re: Problem with latest autotools update

Have a look here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-September/044027.html and here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-September/044026.html It looks like more people have the same problem. I just cvsup'd my ports tree and attempted to update

Re: trouble with ImageMagick self tests

I test it with perl support disabled and it works. [ On Sunday, September 30, Philipp Ost wrote: ] I disabled perl-support and all was fine... For the sake of completeness: H. Well, I depend quite heavily on the Perl support :( (and had already disabled FXP). Does anybody

Re: can't upgrade proftpd in FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE

://www.alaskaparadise.com --- ___ 1.3.1rc1_1 overwrites /usr/local/etc/proftpd.conf instead of making a dist file. Chris ___ freebsd

Re: can't upgrade proftpd in FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE

On 01/01/07, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 01 January 2007 02:28, Chris wrote: On 31/12/06, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 31 December 2006 06:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On all of my installations that have proftpd-1.3.0_5 I get the following error

a $PREFIX question...

. :) Thank you for your time and consideration. --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

reintroduction of php5_pcre broken

Thanks for the solution. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

graphics/mesa-demos fails to build

to manually download MesaLib-7.6.1.tar.bz2 from the freedesktop.org site since there seems to be an MD5 and SHA256 checksum error with the mirror sites. The MesaDemos-7.6.1.tar.bz2 file seems to be fine, however. Any help here would greatly be appreciated! Thanks! Chris

Re: graphics/mesa-demos fails to build

at 10:49 AM, Chris behrnetwo...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm seeing this when I try to build from ports: /var/tmp//ccNBgj1B.o(.text+0x1c5): In function `main': : undefined reference to `glXCreateGLXPixmapMESA' gmake[2]: *** [glxpixmap] Error 1 gmake[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs

Re: virtualbox issue

Hi, I got this too and found it was something to do with my src.conf but I got lazy and didn't bother to test which one it was. But it's a start? Chris On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:34:17 -0600 R. Scott Evansfreebsd-emulat...@rsle.net wrote I sucessfully updated virtualbox on my 9.3

Re:

Hi, Try compiling it from ports, or supply us with some sort of debug info. Chris - Chris Petrik FreeBSD Developer E on FreeBSD -- As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know its true name. -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie

Re: Updating CentOS ports infrastructure

On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:31:34 -0600 Jerrylt;je...@seibercom.netgt; wrote Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:27:41 -0500 UPDATING 20141209 does not specifically list having to install the emulators/linux-c6 port. Isn't that a required prerequisite? -- Jerry This is the meta port, ports such

Re: Resetting maintainership

On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:31:54 -0600 Dan Langillelt;d...@langille.orggt; wrote gt; On Dec 10, 2014, at 5:27 PM, Pietro Cerutti lt;g...@freebsd.orggt; wrote: gt; gt; All, gt; gt; unfortunately, I don't foresee having time to take care of my ports as gt; they deserve in the near

Re: Re: Resetting maintainership

On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:25:42 -0600 Chris H lt;bsd-li...@bsdforge.comgt; wrote On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:01:29 -0600 chris lt;ch...@bsdjunk.comgt; wrote gt; On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:31:54 -0600 Dan Langilleamp;lt;d...@langille.orgamp;gt; gt; wrote gt; gt; gt; amp;gt; On Dec

Re: FreeBSD Port: hiawatha-9.8

On , Alex wrote: Hello, hiawatha-web server 9.11 is out and include many nice features and updates. Please update hiawatha port and pkg. Thanks in advance. I am working on a update that uses the port polarssl which looks to be broken atm. Once that is fixed I will submit a PR for such

Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release

Dirk, it wont be as messy as the havoc it can cause on production machines. There is several ports which have multiple versions without a mess, I do not see wh openssl would be any different as the version used can be put in the make.conf. I just had a quick glance at the 1.2 changelog, and it

Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release

Hi I am excited about opensl 1.1 but I am not sure if it is right to just jump the security/openssl port to it, maybe make a new security/openssl11 port? Or move the default port but add a new security/openssl10 port for 1.0.2. Chris On 22 August 2016 at 19:39, Mathieu Arnold <m...@freebsd.

Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release

On 22 August 2016 at 19:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to > ports@ where this belongs a lot more. > > +--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil wrote: > | Curious to know how we should

Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release

On 22 August 2016 at 19:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to > ports@ where this belongs a lot more. > > +--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil wrote: > | Curious to know how we should

python support appears broken in the ports trree

sitory UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 519768 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: pizzamig Last Changed Rev: 519768 Last Changed Date: 2019-12-10 09:39:01 -0800 (Tue, 10 Dec 2019) Thank you for all your time, and consideration. --Chris ___

Re: python support appears broken in the ports trree

On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:53:38 -0800 s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu said Thank you very much for taking the time to reply. On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 04:47:06PM -0800, Chris wrote: > I struggled all day yesterday with various ports barfing with similar > python messages. So today

Re: python support appears broken in the ports trree

On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 06:21:29 +0100 Jan Beich jbe...@freebsd.org said Chris writes: > I struggled all day yesterday with various ports barfing with similar > python messages. So today I blew everything off the disk, and started > from scratch. Which only repeats what happened

Re: What is the actual syntax used to FLAVOR ports?

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:45:53 +0100 Mathieu Arnold m...@freebsd.org said On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:02:34PM -0500, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 1:27 PM Chris wrote: > > > > > OK I know FLAVOR is an evolving concept. But I can no

Re: What is the actual syntax used to FLAVOR ports?

On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 21:44:35 -0800 Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com said On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 1:27 PM Chris wrote: > OK I know FLAVOR is an evolving concept. But I can not find > the FLAVOR documentation. Only references in the porters > handbook. What I think needs to be

Re: When to use TMPPLIST instead of pkg-plist?

of so many variables, that TMPPLIST isn't always correct. So to rely on it, as Mathieu stated, would be *bad* policy. As memory serves; it's also the product of make make-plist. Hope that helps in clarification. :) --Chris FreeBSD 14.0-FUTURE #0.000 cray25

Re: When to use TMPPLIST instead of pkg-plist?

it's output is subject to scrutiny by the maintainer. --Chris Theron ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: When to use TMPPLIST instead of pkg-plist?

On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 19:44:40 + Bob Eager r...@tavi.co.uk said On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:29:18 -0800 Chris wrote: > TMPPLIST is an artifact of the QA process when making a port. It is > used for comparison to what you, as a port maintainer claim is the > pkg-plist, and whats found t

Re: llvm80-8.0.1_3 needs Python 3.6 at least, but 2.7 was specified.

On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:52:23 + Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org said On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 08:44:59AM -0800, Chris wrote: > I'm testing modifications of ports I maintain in > a jail. I have nothing in make.conf(5) except > DEVELOPER=true > But I get messages regarding python v

Re: llvm80-8.0.1_3 needs Python 3.6 at least, but 2.7 was specified.

On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:46:12 +0100 Mathieu Arnold m...@freebsd.org said On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 07:52:23PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 08:44:59AM -0800, Chris wrote: > > I'm testing modifications of ports I maintain in > > a jail. I have nothing in make

llvm80-8.0.1_3 needs Python 3.6 at least, but 2.7 was specified.

it. :) Thanks! --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: About protocols in openssl

r Makefile. I'll probably get a lot of grief for saying all this. So I'll share those details off list. So as not to give instructions on how to subvert the ports system. ;) HTH --Chris FreeBSD 14.0-FUTURE #0.000 cray256 --WjW ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili

Re: New bacula release

=100=excludedeleted=category=asc=Search indicates bacula is already at 9.6.2. :) HTH --Chris FreeBSD 14.0-FUTURE #0.000 cray256 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any

Re: claws-mail search a new home

(Maintain it). :) Thanks for your time, and consideration! --Chris FreeBSD 14.0-FUTURE #0.000 cray256 Cheers Jochen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to &quo

What is the actual syntax used to FLAVOR ports?

how to flavor, and build python flavors. But what of Perl? make FLAVOR=perl2.8. Nope. How about make FLAVOR=p5-28, and so it goes... Does there exist a definitive list of flavors? It'd also be valuable for defining defaults in make.conf(5) Thanks! --Chris

7 month old bug squashed. Please commit

Hi I just picked up mail/claws-mail, and discovered a 7 month old bug. I resolved the problem, and created a patch to fix it. I wouldn't normally say anything except that it's such an old bug. pr: 239659 Thanks! --Chris ___ freebsd-ports

Re: mail/mailman v3?

't that sort of redundant? I mean; have you ever seen a kitty that _wasn't_ *hyper* ? :) --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb

Re: mail/mailman v3?

with this part)? <https://github.com/naftaliharris/tauthon> In sentiment I am inline with your thoughts as well. Would it be a worthy project to create a mailman(2)-lts port? I'd be fully up for helping, and or creating it myself. There's a port that's a shim for py2.x-

Re: mail/mailman v3?

On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:03:20 +0200 Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de said Am 28.04.20 um 22:02 schrieb Chris: > In sentiment I am inline with your thoughts as well. > Would it be a worthy project to create a mailman(2)-lts port? > I'd be fully up for helping, and or creating

Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

On Tue, 5 May 2020 22:38:36 +0200 Leander Schaefer i...@netocean.de said Hello, I have been dealing with Poudriere for quite a while and one of the most issues I have is, that I have ports which won't compile along with another. Reason is mostly something like: pkg-static:

Re: Are broken ports retested before performing scheduled removal?

a/distfiles/oneko-2.0b-bsd0.2.tar.gz oneko-2.0b-bsd0.2.tar.gz 100% of 21 kB 159 kBps 00m00s ===> Fetching all distfiles required by oneko-2.0b_5 for building As you can see, oneko-2.0b-tip1.7.tar.gz failed, and required freebsd's discache. Al

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

Try disabling DOCS option on devel/llvm80 for now. > > I've opened a PR to track this issue: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246487 > Wish I'd known it was only the DOCS option! Too late now, sphinx18 is deinstalled and llvm80 is building. This is probabl

Re: pkg: how to retrieve the messages ports emit after install?

On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:27:29 + Bob Eager r...@tavi.co.uk said On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 23:28:49 -0700 Chris wrote: > OK I'm a by ports make install as a rule. But I needed to > spin up a box quickly, and decided to use pkg(8). xorg, > and another port (package) I installed, du

Re: pkg: how to retrieve the messages ports emit after install?

On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 14:20:05 + Bob Eager r...@tavi.co.uk said On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 07:18:40 -0700 Chris wrote: > > > OK I'm a by ports make install as a rule. But I needed to > > > spin up a box quickly, and decided to use pkg(8). xorg, > > > and another port (p

Re: pkg: how to retrieve the messages ports emit after install?

On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:31:53 +0100 Mateusz Piotrowski mpp...@gmail.com said On 3/18/20 5:20 PM, Chris wrote: > IMHO this should be added to the pkg(8) man page. Maybe the EXAMPLES > section? https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/pull/1819 Cheers, Mateusz WOW! That was fast. Tha

drmn0: This code is obsolete abandonware. Install the graphics/drm-legacy-kmod pkg

ist="/boot/modules/i915kms.ko">>/etc/rc.conf and bounce the box. This drm problem also seems to be interfering with my ability to run xfce4 (of xorg) properly. What do I need to do? Thanks! --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

pkg: how to retrieve the messages ports emit after install?

. But the new graphics drivers don't allow that sort of thing (graphics vs text mode). So I was left with mostly gibberish. I need to get that information back. I just guessed that pkg message might do it. But no joy. How can I retrieve that information? Thanks! --Chris

Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

On Thu, 7 May 2020 20:39:41 +0200 Leander Schaefer i...@netocean.de said Hello Chris, Hello List, I have checked out ports-mgmt/synth unfortunately it would be a massive downgrade compared to poudriere. Does anyone have the right clue about how the FreeBSD package managment team provides

Re: Wrong Ports-OSVERSION in jails

help: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/versions-12.html just change versions-12 to versions-13 for 13* Annoying, isn't it? :-) HTH --Chris When i connect into the jail, the Tree is available and ready to use with this entry in /etc/make.conf: KDIRPREFIX=/tmp DISTDI

Re: Gratuitous port splitting (was: Port Avidemux)

to propose making a meta-port called "avidemux" with options that pull only what's required to create a functional port. But decided to wait till I got through all my mail first, in case someone as (at least) as smart as I am beat me to the proposal. ;-) --Chris Cheers, Freddie

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

doesn't work offline which git does. With git, you can also easily add the history by running "git pull --unshallow" * This migration away from portsnap fits well with the planned migration to git. Please tell me that this doesn't mean a [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of subversio

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

Kurt! :-) This is very bad news for us. I can make so many arguments against dropping subversion. It's really not (needn't be) a matter of either/or. Thanks again, Kurt. Even if it wasn't what I wanted to hear. --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@fre

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

tfully, Robert Huff --Chris -- Get it right: _physical_ distancing; _social_ cohesion ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q

ln -s python3 python2 && ln -s python37 python27?

te maddening. There must be a way out. No? Thank you in advance for any, and all clues to salvation! :-) --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: pkg feature request

to manually run svn. +1 Yes, please. Even if only the src rev the packages were built from. Cobbling up a script to capture the output of pkg srcrev/revno would be trivial to pass to svn up/co. :-) -- Mike Clarke [1] http://beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org/jail.html?mastername=121amd64-defau

Re: Gracefully killing and restarting a port build....

a dumb question, Not at all. :-) I usually leverage multiple terminals, and simply dedicate one to the/a build session. So simply issuing a ^C to that terminal sends an INTR to the parent, and children. I've experienced no problems restarting the process (build) after doing so. HTH! :-) --Chris

Re: Gracefully killing and restarting a port build....

(/bin/sh) to the list of potential "victims" in your kill list. :-) --Chris Thanks for your help bob prohaska ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsub

Re: Porting Practice

) HTH! --Chris The documentation for (diff -u) says "To create a suitable diff for a single patch, copy the file that needs patching to something.orig, save the changes to something and then create the patch:" % diff -u something.orig something > something.diff Im not sure

Re: Porting Practice

On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 13:07:53 +1200 Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz said On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 12:47, Brandon helsley wrote: > > I have gotten a couple of emails from portscout about ports that need updated > and maintained. Before I go about updating and maintaining these ports I wanted > to do

Re: How to fix/patch hardcoded values

On 2020-12-29 00:07, Mathieu Arnold wrote: On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 09:58:13PM +, Nuno Teixeira wrote: Hello I've just submited a new port net/gitup and I used a simple workaround to help program find its config in /usr/local/etc

What's the procedure to rename a port?

, it's potential popularity. Would better expressed as: tkrcs. How to proceed, where the ports infrastructure is concerned? Thanks! --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe

Re: Bug 251656

gets assigned, and addressed more promptly. :-)00 FYI ideally, the topic should have read: x11-servers/xorg-server: segmentation fault Seems insignificant. But the colon is significant. HTH --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https

Re: STOP rust!

and unreasonable. It's a hard point to argue when confronted with the fact that using a multi-gig builder to build a several-k library/program is just impractical, and unreasonable. Thanks for listening. :-) --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: Bind master error on empty.db

*UA:2.3654.0.3.2.82, 0.089-1--sample, 0.093-4--ignoring, 0.093-2--H*F:D*kreme.com, 0.116-+--error, 0.124-1--rushed, 0.126-+--etc BAYES_ST0.987-1--HX-Envelope-From:sk:kremels Looks to me that it (empty.db) may not be properly listed in the ports pkg-plist file. As an aside; w

Re: portmaster new development

thing about options, is that *everyone* gets to have one. The more the merrier! :-) @Stefan Really excited to hear about your LUA version of portmaster. Thanks! :-) --Chris Regards, STefan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: TeXLive 2020 Update

with any/all related individuals. Those already maintaining ports are already subscribed to this list, and will receive reports of your work here (bugzilla posts to this and other related lists). I hope this helps, and thanks again! :-) --Chris Thanks! Travis

GitHub: size of remote file is not known

for those attempting to build ports on a system with limited resources -- especially during a meta-port build, and even more so for newcomers. Is anyone familiar with why this is so? I'd like to change this. Thanks! --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: GitHub: size of remote file is not known

On 2021-01-05 03:49, Mathieu Arnold wrote: On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 08:04:32PM -0800, Chris wrote: I don't use Github. So I'm not familiar with their service(s). But ports using source fetched from them always return: size of remote file is not known Is it that their servers simply refuse

Can we create an (only for) ARCHS meta-category?

that were known to work on archs *besides* x86/amd64. They'd know what to anticipate, if they're looking to start (or continue) using FreeBSD. This seems especially important where meta-ports are concerned. Thanks! :-) --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: OpenSource app Simple Diary

are: - GTK+3 x11-toolkits/gtk30/ ? - webkit2gtk-4.0 www/webkit2-gtk3/ - md4c and md4c-html - Not quite sure what these might translate to. --Chris Do we have them in our ports collection in head? I couldn't see them, at least not with the above names exactly. Thanks matthias Simple

pkg-fallout: License not correctly defined: defining both LICENSE_FILE and LICENSE_TEXT is not allowed

contains only: LICENSE=LGPL3 LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/COPYING for the license section. Please advise, or tell me how to fix the pkg builder. Thanks! --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: pkg-fallout: License not correctly defined: defining both LICENSE_FILE and LICENSE_TEXT is not allowed

On 2021-05-13 09:08, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: ## Chris (portmas...@bsdforge.com): HOWEVER the error returned by pkg-fallout@ makes absolutely no sense at all, given the Makefile for the report contains only: Foremost, that Makefile has an .include, and that's where the mess

Re: pkg-fallout: License not correctly defined: defining both LICENSE_FILE and LICENSE_TEXT is not allowed

On 2021-05-14 14:19, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: ## Chris (portmas...@bsdforge.com): > but the way it currently interacts > with your port is not that fine: in the very least, it overwrites > your LICENSE variables, which cannot be your intention. (Try > "make -V LICE

Re: pkg-fallout: License not correctly defined: defining both LICENSE_FILE and LICENSE_TEXT is not allowed

On 2021-05-14 15:15, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: ## Chris (portmas...@bsdforge.com): The problem I'm addressing in this case; is that the following as *always* worked for licenses which carried a copy in ${WRKSRC}/LICENSE_NAME: The problem you're trying to address is only a consecutive

Re: Is there a way to subscribe to the commit messages for only ports you maintain?

e a 1/4 billion IPv4 addresses. Over 99% of them are UNMAINTAINED. Proving the hype over IPv4 exhaustion is pure BS. I track them, they remain unmaintained, and OUT of my mail queues. :-) Thanks for taking the time to share your (wisdom) and hacks, Julian! :-) --Chris Cheers, _

Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x

On 2021-05-05 09:10, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: From: Chris Subject: Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 08:03:00 -0700 I ran into a similar situation requiring freebsd 11 users not use SSL from base, and I simply used a conditional based

Re: Making a port to use OpenSSL of ports collection on FreeBSD 11.x

On 2021-05-05 20:49, Dima Panov wrote: Moin! Chris, your suggestion leads to dll hell due to mix-links between ssl libraries :( At least, your setup easily face up situation where one lib will be built with “port openss” and consumers still get a “base openssl”. DEFAULT_VERSION here is set

Is there a way to subscribe to the commit messages for only ports you maintain?

I'd like to subscribe to the commit messages ( dev-commits-ports-all ) but only receive messages that affect me -- the ports I currently maintain. Is it possible? Or am I just dreaming? ;-) Thanks in advance for any insight into this. --Chris

Re: Is there a way to subscribe to the commit messages for only ports you maintain?

On 2021-05-17 16:30, Jan Beich wrote: Chris writes: I'd like to subscribe to the commit messages ( dev-commits-ports-all ) but only receive messages that affect me -- the ports I currently maintain. Is it possible? Or am I just dreaming? ;-) No clue but I use Herald rules for something

Re: Is there a way to subscribe to the commit messages for only ports you maintain?

On 2021-05-17 18:17, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Chris wrote: On 2021-05-17 16:30, Jan Beich wrote: > Chris writes: > >> I'd like to subscribe to the commit messages >> ( dev-commits-ports-all ) >> but only receive messages that affect me -- the >> ports I curr

Re: Large builds with poudriere

On 2021-05-20 13:47, Mark Millard wrote: Chris portmaster at bsdforge.com wrote on Thu May 20 20:09:29 UTC 2021 : On 2021-05-20 12:21, Kevin Oberman wrote: > . . . >> > You can greatly reduce the build-time for devel/llvm* by changing the > config to BE_NATIVE to avoid bu

Re: Is there a way to subscribe to the commit messages for only ports you maintain?

On 2021-05-17 23:46, Michael Gmelin wrote: On Tue, 18 May 2021 03:17:03 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: Chris wrote: > On 2021-05-17 16:30, Jan Beich wrote: > > Chris writes: > > > >> I'd like to subscribe to the commit messages > >> ( dev-commits

Re: Is there a way to subscribe to the commit messages for only ports you maintain?

ook closer. Thanks again! :-) --Chris Li-Wen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: port files/patch-*: PREFIX or LOCALBASE

iable? ${PREFIX} or ${LOCALBASE}? Right or wrong. I've always used ${PREFIX} with great success. pkg(8) can assist you as well. Have a look at make -DBATCH makeplist to see what pkg thinks you mean. HTH --Chris Thanks in advance, eduardo ___ free

Re: Is there a way to subscribe to the commit messages for only ports you maintain?

On 2021-05-19 03:45, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 18-5-2021 03:56, Chris wrote: On 2021-05-17 18:17, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Chris wrote: On 2021-05-17 16:30, Jan Beich wrote: > Chris writes: > >> I'd like to subscribe to the commit messages >> ( dev-commits-ports-all ) &

Re: Large builds with poudriere

On 2021-05-20 12:21, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:08 AM Chris wrote: On 2021-05-20 06:15, Ronald Klop wrote: > On 5/20/21 2:47 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: >> El jue., 20 may. 2021 14:45, Alexis Praga >> escribió: >> >>> >>> Hi

Re: Large builds with poudriere

ts. Even with 8 cores, 16 threads @4.2Ghz && 128Gb RAM. It's a daunting task. I generally use jail(8) otherwise. --Chris Thanks, [1] For https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233010 [2] For https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255233

Re: Large builds with poudriere

know that. :-/ Thanks, Ronald. Today you are a hero! :-) --Chris Ronald. Thanks, [1] For https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233010 [2] For https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=255233 -- Alexis Praga ___ freebsd

Looking for a committer

join the ports team. Please accept my application. :-) --Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >