pypy-1.7

2011-12-18 Thread David Naylor
Hi All, As of 2011/12/13 pypy-1.7 is in ports (under lang/pypy, thanks lwhsu@). Please uninstall pypy-1.6 before building pypy-1.7, there is a memory leak in pypy-1.6 that prevents it from translating pypy-1.7. For those that are interested, there is a TODO list [1] and the WIP repository

MAKE_JOBS and openjdk6

2010-06-25 Thread David Naylor
Hi, java/openjdk6 breaks with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS (it implements its own think). The attached patch fixes openjdk6, marks it as MAKE_JOBS_SAFE and makes it respect MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER. Regards, David P.S. I'm off list --- /usr/ports/java/openjdk6/Makefile 2010-05-22 03:05:20.0 +0200 +++

Re: MAKE_JOBS and openjdk6

2010-06-25 Thread David Naylor
On Friday 25 June 2010 18:08:22 David Naylor wrote: Hi, java/openjdk6 breaks with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS (it implements its own think). The attached patch fixes openjdk6, marks it as MAKE_JOBS_SAFE and makes it respect MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER. Regards, David P.S. I'm off list Oops. My hack

Re: MAKE_JOBS and openjdk6

2010-07-19 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday 26 June 2010 00:15:16 Anonymous wrote: David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com writes: On Friday 25 June 2010 18:08:22 David Naylor wrote: Hi, java/openjdk6 breaks with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS (it implements its own think). The attached patch fixes openjdk6, marks

Re: MAKE_JOBS and openjdk6

2010-08-28 Thread David Naylor
On Friday 20 August 2010 17:12:42 Anonymous wrote: Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes: David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com writes: %% Index: java/openjdk6/Makefile @@ -266,3 +267,6 @@ post-install: @${CAT} ${PKGMESSAGE} .include bsd.port.post.mk + +# XXX: use

Re: MAKE_JOBS and openjdk6

2010-08-29 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday 28 August 2010 23:30:22 Greg Lewis wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:44:39AM +0400, Anonymous wrote: Greg Lewis gle...@eyesbeyond.com writes: I would argue that overriding a private variable is a hack (other ports doing it doesn't make it not a hack). You could've spoke

Re: MAKE_JOBS and openjdk6

2010-09-05 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday 04 September 2010 23:26:27 Greg Lewis wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:37:37AM +0200, David Naylor wrote: On Saturday 28 August 2010 23:30:22 Greg Lewis wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:44:39AM +0400, Anonymous wrote: Greg Lewis gle...@eyesbeyond.com writes: Your

MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-21 Thread David Naylor
Hi, The following ports failed to build on my system (with a quad core) and FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set. They did success to build once I added MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes to their Makefile's. devel/nasm graphics/libart_lgpl lang/ocaml multimedia/mplayer multimedia/smplayer security/nss Is there any

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-22 Thread David Naylor
-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 08:03:42 +0300 On Thu, 21 May 2009 12:05:22 +0200 David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote: P.P.S. editors/openoffice-3 does not obey MAKE_JOBS, it requires MAXMODULES

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-23 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday 23 May 2009 12:51:33 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Sat, 23 May 2009 18:24:26 +0900 (JST) Maho NAKATA cha...@mac.com wrote: Please see attached for the patch. The changes to bsd.port.mk: - MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER always defined - MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER forced to 1 if UNSAFE of DISABLE

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-24 Thread David Naylor
On Sunday 24 May 2009 00:16:37 Maho NAKATA wrote: Hi I tested it yesterday, 1. I need MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes in the Makefile. Yes, you would need that. I believe that will be default. 2. with above patch, ooo2 doesn't launch parallele jobs. I spotted that problem after

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-24 Thread David Naylor
On Sunday 24 May 2009 18:27:57 Pav Lucistnik wrote: Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v ne 24. 05. 2009 v 19:01 +0300: On Sun, 24 May 2009 16:10:23 +0200 Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org wrote: Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300: - MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-25 Thread David Naylor
On Monday 25 May 2009 20:01:25 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Mon, 25 May 2009 10:03:12 +0200 David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday 24 May 2009 21:37:45 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Sun, 24 May 2009 10:26:23 +0200 David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday 24

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-26 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 10:48:25 Pav Lucistnik wrote: David Naylor píše v út 26. 05. 2009 v 08:19 +0200: pav: ${_MAKE_JOBS:C/-j//} won't work with DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS (or MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE) since it needs to always be a positive number, secondly it still cannot be used for conditional code

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-05-27 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 23:23:16 Pav Lucistnik wrote: David Naylor píše v út 26. 05. 2009 v 18:17 +0200: What about the change that exposes MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER when MAKE_JOBS_SAFE or FORCE_MAKE_JOBS are defined (to avoid using ${_MAKE_JOBS:C/-j//}, not sure what the policy is of ports using

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-06-06 Thread David Naylor
On Thursday 21 May 2009 13:56:46 Pav Lucistnik wrote: On Thu, 21 May 2009 12:05:22 +0200, David Naylor wrote The following ports failed to build on my system (with a quad core) and FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set. They did success to build once I added MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes to their Makefile's

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-06-07 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday 06 June 2009 22:56:47 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:05:14 +0200 David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote: P.S. Is anyone interested in a list of ports that do not compile under tmpfs? Me. The following are on my blacklist for tmpfs build, where: # df -h

Re: [kde-freebsd] [CFT] KDE 4.3.2 / Qt 4.5.3 Ready for Testing

2009-10-08 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday, 6 October 2009 20:12:55 Martin Wilke wrote: We're happy to announce that KDE-4.3.2 is ready for testing. KDE-4.3.2 is only a Bugfix release. If you want to play with KDE 4.3.2 please checkout all ports from area51. A note about area51, we have changed the repo layout, Qt and

Request for assistance: portbuilder

2013-08-12 Thread David Naylor
Hi All, I'm looking for assistance with maintaining portbuilder. I do not have time at the moment to maintain it and it has some shortcomings with recent developments from Ports (for example, it cannot bootstrap a new environment due to dialog4ports). If you are interest, please contact

Re: Netflix support

2013-08-12 Thread David Naylor
Hi Richard, I have forwarded your email on to Gerald who is the maintainer of the port. We generally prefer to wait for the wine devs to integrate the patches instead of doing an out-of-version patch. That being said, if this requires FreeBSD specific code the only likely way the code will

Re: How to start wine?

2013-08-25 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday, 24 August 2013 15:12:57 Thomas Mueller wrote: I built wine from ports on a USB-stick installation of FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE i386, but it won't start. I tried to start from hard-drive installation of (from uname -a) FreeBSD amelia2 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #17 r254196:

Re: How to start wine?

2013-08-26 Thread David Naylor
On Monday, 26 August 2013 11:58:12 Thomas Mueller wrote: What are LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH supposed to be? I see neither of these environment variables defined. The LD_(32_)LIBRARY_PATH variables are used by ld-elf(32).so.1 in resolving the libraries. And what about PATH?

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] New compiler USES flag, please test, review comment

2013-09-16 Thread David Naylor
On Friday 13 September 2013 15:17:53 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, Hi, Given how old our gcc in base is and the work done on clang and libc++. It is becoming complicating to make some ports properly working on all supported version of FreeBSD. To help in that I would like to propose a

Fwd: [REL - 83i386-default][x11-toolkits/py-kivy] Failed for py27-kivy-1.7.1 in build

2013-09-19 Thread David Naylor
Hi All, Could someone please help me with this. It doesn't make any sense. I have isolated the issue to building on i386 under old Xorg (libGL v7). This does not happen when using new Xorg (libGL v8 - WITH_NEW_XORG), nvidia libGL or under amd64. If I run ldd(1) on

Re: poudriere + soundkonverter build fails

2013-11-06 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday, 5 November 2013 14:54:12 Wolfgang Riegler wrote: Hi, Hi, building soundkonverter fails on 9.1 AMD64 with: /usr/local/include/taglib/mp4coverart.h:49: error: comma at end of enumerator list *** [CMakeFiles/soundkonverter.dir/metadata/tagengine.o] Error code 1 My options are:

lang/gcc46 leaving directories around (WAS: [QAT] r334234: 3x leftovers, 1x depend_object)

2013-11-22 Thread David Naylor
Hi All / Gerald, The following reports indicate that /usr/local/share/info/gcc46 (directory) is being left in the working environment and not properly cleaned up. Since the ports do not create or use anything in that directory I assume this is an issue with the lang/gcc46 port. If this has

Re: lang/gcc46 leaving directories around (WAS: [QAT] r334234: 3x leftovers, 1x depend_object)

2013-11-24 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday, 23 November 2013 03:00:54 Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: This should be a definitive fix: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/fix-info-subdir.diff Btw that have shown a bug in pkg 1.2.0 rc1 and prior (not in 1.1.x) I have fix in master and

Re: [kde-freebsd] Error using CMake similar to error from earlier list post

2013-12-10 Thread David Naylor
Hi Joe, I'm listening! I've read through your thread on KDE-FreeBSD and Ports-FreeBSD however I am a bit fuzzy as to the issues. Are these specific to clang, FreeBSD = 10 or some other trigger? How would I go about reproducing these errors? I'm happy to work with you to resolve these

Re: Setting up tinderbox-devel on a pkgng system

2013-01-19 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday, 19 January 2013 16:10:38 Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 5:29 AM, David Naylor d...@freebsd.org wrote: Another issue is that, by default, the port installs databases/p5-DBD-mysql which is not a recognised port. The attached patch fixes that [2]. I'm

[RFC] lang/pypy

2013-03-02 Thread David Naylor
Hi All. After many months of (sporadic) work I would like to introduce pypy-2.0.b1. Could you please have a look at, and test, my proposed changes (attached) and the wiki page at http://wiki.FreeBSD.org/PyPy. I would like to commit these changes (after incorporating feedback) sometime

Re: Re: [RFC] lang/pypy

2013-03-10 Thread David Naylor
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 00:37:15 poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp wrote: Hi, good work, David. Hi Kuro It compiles, packages and works flawlessly here for replacement of 1.9 so far for a week. Great, thanks. Good to know :-) On my compile box, amd64/Athlon64 5050e 2.6GHz 2 core/8GB,

Re: [REVIEW] Completing i386-wine

2013-08-05 Thread David Naylor
On Monday, 5 August 2013 02:31:54 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: Would there also be the possibility to have i386-wine as a source-code port, and build from i386 installation? That avoids cross-compiling. One could build an i386 installation either from amd64 or previous i386 installation,

FreeBSD Port: libpreludedb-0.9.10

2006-10-24 Thread David Naylor
Hi, I have recently tried a make index for the ports dir, it failed with a complaint about libpreludedb, when I tried to make libpreludedb I got the same error. (My make.conf includes WITH_PYTHON=yes) From the build command: make WITH_PYTHON=yes Makefile, line 43: Could not

Re: [kde-freebsd] Call for Testing KDE 4.2 for FreeBSD

2009-02-02 Thread David Naylor
On Sunday 01 February 2009 23:02:28 Martin Wilke wrote: Howdy Guys, The KDE FreeBSD team is happy to announce the first public Call for Testing for KDE 4.2. Over the past weeks we have focused on the complex and very time consuming task to get KDE 4.2 running. Please read UPDATING-area51

Re: [kde-freebsd] Call for Testing KDE 4.2 for FreeBSD

2009-02-02 Thread David Naylor
On Monday 02 February 2009 12:01:10 David Naylor wrote: On Sunday 01 February 2009 23:02:28 Martin Wilke wrote: Howdy Guys, The KDE FreeBSD team is happy to announce the first public Call for Testing for KDE 4.2. Over the past weeks we have focused on the complex and very time consuming

Re: [kde-freebsd] Call for Testing KDE 4.2 for FreeBSD

2009-02-03 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:05:19 Max Brazhnikov wrote: On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:31:10 +0200, David Naylor wrote: On Monday 02 February 2009 12:01:10 David Naylor wrote: Just finished compiling on FreeBSD 7.1 and have found the following problems: 1. The fonts are not being anti-aliased

Re: [kde-freebsd] Call for Testing KDE 4.2 for FreeBSD

2009-02-03 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 18:44:55 Kris Moore wrote: David Naylor wrote: On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:05:19 Max Brazhnikov wrote: On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:31:10 +0200, David Naylor wrote: On Monday 02 February 2009 12:01:10 David Naylor wrote: Just finished compiling on FreeBSD 7.1

Ports requiring MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE

2009-04-07 Thread David Naylor
Hi, I've recently added FORCE_MAKE_JOBS to my make.conf and the following ports popped up as failling. This is on a quad core system (running FreeBSD 7.1p2-i386). I tried MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=3,2,1 in tern and all failed (even with =1). The ports did complete properly with DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS

Re: Ports requiring MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE

2009-04-12 Thread David Naylor
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 01:26:31 Pav Lucistnik wrote: David Naylor píše v út 07. 04. 2009 v 20:07 +0200: I've recently added FORCE_MAKE_JOBS to my make.conf and the following ports popped up as failling. This is on a quad core system (running FreeBSD 7.1p2-i386). I tried

Re: [kde-freebsd] Error using CMake similar to error from earlier list post

2014-02-25 Thread David Naylor
Hi Joe, Apologies for taking so long to get back to you. Work got really, really busy. The underlying issue is that gcc pulls in the pthread headers by default while clang does not. I believe clang is following the more correct approach. The files you attached are for traverso however I

Re: [ECFT] drm/dri/mesa/xorg-server update [Part 1]

2011-03-16 Thread David Naylor
On Friday 11 March 2011 13:37:59 Martin Wilke wrote: Hi, First of all, note that *this is very experimental, so you really have to know what you’re doing.* We managed to get drm/dri with the newer xorg-server to work, and we have removed the support for WITHOUT_NOUVEAU. We have just

Re: TeXLive merge into FreeBSD ports tree - FreeBSD project idea

2012-06-18 Thread David Naylor
Hi all, Summary of below. I have started an effort to get TeXLive into the FreeBSD ports. See github.com/DragonSA/texlive for details. Volunteers welcome. On Sunday, 17 June 2012 22:04:15 David Schultz wrote: On Sun, Jun 17, 2012, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: Even with a knob instead of

Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)

2012-06-23 Thread David Naylor
On Friday, 22 June 2012 12:26:50 Jan Beich wrote: (ports@ folk may know more about pkgng) David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com writes: Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.6 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. The packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng* [3] format

Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.8 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)

2012-07-09 Thread David Naylor
Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.8 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. The packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng* [3] format. There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users). The

wine/i386 for FreeBSD/amd64 port (aka wine-fbsd64)

2012-11-03 Thread David Naylor
Hi List, # Executive Summary Over the past years I have been maintaining the wine-fbsd64 port (see http://mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 for more). The port itself effectively does static linking (it bundles all the libraries wine needs) with scripts to bootstrap the environment to easily use

Re: wine/i386 for FreeBSD/amd64 port (aka wine-fbsd64)

2012-11-07 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday, 3 November 2012 22:47:56 Jan Beich wrote: David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com writes: The post-package-script (run only if WITH_PKGNG is defined): - Amends the package so the arch label to 64bit WITH_PKGNG is checked too early. The port fails to fix arch on 10.0 without

Re: wine/i386 for FreeBSD/amd64 port (aka wine-fbsd64)

2012-11-07 Thread David Naylor
On Wednesday, 7 November 2012 11:45:11 Thomas Mueller wrote: from David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com: Hi List, # Executive Summary Over the past years I have been maintaining the wine-fbsd64 port (see http://mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 for more). The port itself effectively does

Re: wine/i386 for FreeBSD/amd64 port (aka wine-fbsd64)

2012-11-07 Thread David Naylor
On Sunday, 4 November 2012 13:31:46 Chris Rees wrote: I think this is very interesting... but I'm not 100% convinced the best place for this is in the ports tree. However, it would improve visibility for it, with a good IGNORE message. Ideally, FreeBSD should have an automagical method of

Re: wine/i386 for FreeBSD/amd64 port (aka wine-fbsd64)

2012-12-28 Thread David Naylor
On 29 Dec 2012 2:03 AM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, David Naylor wrote: # Executive Summary Over the past years I have been maintaining the wine-fbsd64 port (see http://mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 for more). The port itself effectively does static

Re: wine (-devel) and i386-wine

2014-09-02 Thread David Naylor
Hi Tom, On Monday, 1 September 2014 22:24:57 Thomas Mueller wrote: I read something about two days on www.freshports.org about wine and i386-wine that alters my plans. I tried to build i386-wine from i386 with the idea of using it both from i386 and amd64, in the latter case mounting the

Re: The mystery of the missing library.

2015-07-28 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote: I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian) doing static linking - that would fix the issue, whatever it is. Can you adjust the port to do the static instead of dynamic linking binary? ``` # cd

Re: The mystery of the missing library.

2015-07-28 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 17:08:37 Bryan Drewery wrote: On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote: Why would the shared library be found when using a relative path but not when using an absolute path? Is this a bug in FreeBSD? What is the output for readelf? readelf -d `which pypy`|grep

The mystery of the missing library.

2015-07-28 Thread David Naylor
Hi Hackers, I am busy simplifying the lang/pypy port (see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3209) however I have uncovered a rather strange problem: ## BACKGROUND ## PyPy has it's own directory layout so we install it into $PREFIX/pypy-2.6. In there is everything pypy needs including bin/pypy

Re: The mystery of the missing library.

2015-07-30 Thread David Naylor
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 09:06:40 Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:46:14AM +0200, David Naylor wrote: On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bart??omiej Rutkowski wrote: I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian) doing static linking

Re: make install for print/texinfo fails on -CURRENT

2017-07-12 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 08:47:17 Bob Willcox wrote: > Hmm, I just tried running synth on my test system again (this is the system > that I successfully built and install texinfo on just a bit ago) and synth > still fails with the same build errors as before. I'm not all that familiar > with

Re: Which wine do I need?

2017-05-14 Thread David Naylor
Hi On Saturday, 13 May 2017 08:16:55 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for > amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation. > > I don't really want i386-wine as such, since I would install wine on i386 > and could then mount this

Re: Which wine do I need?

2017-05-15 Thread David Naylor
On Sunday, 14 May 2017 23:23:05 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for > amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation. - On an i386 environment with 32-bit Windows binaries use lang/wine. - On an amd64 environment with 32-bit

Re: Help Wanted - Work with MSFT and help finish the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD

2017-09-05 Thread David Naylor
On Monday, 4 September 2017 10:54:21 Geoffrey Huntley wrote: > See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHllisWOCpU and > https://twitter.com/GeoffreyHuntley/status/904227946084294656 Hi Geoffrey It is great to hear there is more interest in finishing the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD (and, I hope,

Re: Mono 5.2 patch and DotNet Core 2 update

2018-01-11 Thread David Naylor
On Wednesday, 10 January 2018 08:55:45 Russell Haley wrote: > Hi David, > > I've successfully built mono based on a modified version of your patch > from here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13752 > > I'm getting size and checksum errors for the file > dotnet-roslyn-322bd5b_GH0.tar.gz. This

Re: emulators/i386-wine-devel

2018-09-15 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday, 01 September 2018 22:45:58 SAST Rozhuk Ivan wrote: > Hi! Hi > What happen with emulators/i386-wine-devel ? Honestly, I've lost interest in compiling the port. I'm working on a means to avoid manual compilation [1][2]. I've attached the scripts I use to build and update the

Re: emulators/i386-wine-devel

2018-09-18 Thread David Naylor
On Sunday, 16 September 2018 23:51:01 SAST Rozhuk Ivan wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:06:01 +0200 > Thanks! > I already subscribe to this and post few comments. > I have no choice - I need wine to few win programs. Is the current version of i386-wine(-devel) not working for you? I understand