attached patch which is
clearly wrong, but works as a stopgap. -- George Mitchell
--- hald/freebsd/probing/probe-hiddev.c.orig2009-09-17 09:47:14.0
-0400
+++ hald/freebsd/probing/probe-hiddev.c 2012-01-14 19:45:46.0 -0500
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include sys/ioctl.h
It tries to compile with clang, which I don't have on my 9.2-RC1 box.
uname:
FreeBSD 9.2-RC1 #0 r253913M: Sat Aug 3 13:28:00 EDT 2013
(The M is because I changed SCHED_ULE to SCHED_4BSD).
/etc/src.conf:
WITHOUT_CLANG=y
/etc/make.conf:
WITH_PKGNG=yes
WITHOUT_CLANG=yes
On 10/02/13 03:21, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
Le 02/10/2013 09:19, Florent Peterschmitt a écrit :
My advise is to reinstall world with clang :)
Or select GCC 4.6+ to build this port in www/chromium options.
Duh! Thanks for pointing out the obvious! I appreciate the help.
-- George
I updated my ports tree to revision 340877, and trying to compile
openjdk7 dies like this:
...
Making SA debugger back-end...
gcc -Damd64 -D_GNU_SOURCE \
-m64 -shared -fPIC -fPIC \
-I/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/hotspot/agent/src/os/bsd
On 01/27/14 09:04, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:23:16AM -0500 I heard the voice of
George Mitchell, and lo! it spake thus:
I updated my ports tree to revision 340877, and trying to compile
openjdk7 dies like this:
cd bsd_amd64_compiler2/product ./test_gamma
Using java
, as I am not on the ports mailing list.)
-- George Mitchell
Index: devel/avarice/Makefile
===
--- devel/avarice/Makefile (revision 340877)
+++ devel/avarice/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
LICENSE= GPLv2
, which depends on libtool.
What to do?
I'm running on a CURRENT build on my Raspberry Pi.
-- George Mitchell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports
On 01/11/13 03:22, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (10/01/2013 20:21), George Mitchell wrote:
I grabbed the ports tree as of 308518, the RELEASE_9_1_0 tag.
devel/libtool won't build, because it requires autom4te during the
configure phase. So I put BUILD_DEPENDS= autom4te:devel/autoconf
in the Makefile
On 01/11/13 19:41, George Mitchell wrote:
On 01/11/13 03:22, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (10/01/2013 20:21), George Mitchell wrote:
I grabbed the ports tree as of 308518, the RELEASE_9_1_0 tag.
devel/libtool won't build, because it requires autom4te during the
configure phase. So I put
January)
ports: svnversion 308518
pkg -v: 1.0.3
What's the best way to proceed? I have CUPS installed and it even
works, but I am pretty sure my printer will work better if I can get
print/hplip installed. -- George Mitchell
On 01/28/13 05:55, Koop Mast wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 10:57 -0500, George Mitchell wrote:
System: Raspberry Pi
uname: r245840M (Alie Tan's image from 25 January)
ports: svnversion 308518
Build dies with message sizeof(ArrayTypeBlob) is expected to be 8 but
is 12. (Complete build log
Couldn't compile chromium without attached patch on FreeBSD 8.4.
-- George
Index: www/chromium/Makefile
===
--- www/chromium/Makefile (revision 346785)
+++ www/chromium/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
On 03/04/14 13:28, René Ladan wrote:
2014-03-04 12:29 GMT+01:00 George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com
mailto:george+free...@m5p.com:
Couldn't compile chromium without attached patch on FreeBSD 8.4.
I committed a slightly different version of your patch in r347055, can
you retry?
René
On 03/05/14 03:30, René Ladan wrote:
On 03/05/2014 01:45, George Mitchell wrote:
On 03/04/14 13:28, René Ladan wrote:
2014-03-04 12:29 GMT+01:00 George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com
mailto:george+free...@m5p.com:
Couldn't compile chromium without attached patch on FreeBSD 8.4.
I
On 03/05/14 06:50, René Ladan wrote:
On 03/05/2014 12:15, George Mitchell wrote:
On 03/05/14 03:30, René Ladan wrote:
On 03/05/2014 01:45, George Mitchell wrote:
On 03/04/14 13:28, René Ladan wrote:
2014-03-04 12:29 GMT+01:00 George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com
mailto:george+free
Updated my ports tree today, and misc/en-freebsd-doc does not build.
It fails in some invisible way as shown in the attached script on
both 8.4-STABLE and 9.2-STABLE. /etc/make.conf says:
WITH_PKGNG=yes
WITHOUT_CLANG=yes
DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes
WITH_NEW_XORG=yes
-- George
typescript
/usr/ports/UPDATING:
This file documents some of the problems you may encounter when upgrading
your ports. We try our best to minimize these disruptions, but sometimes
they are unavoidable.
You should get into the habit of checking this file for changes each time
you update your ports
In the process of building and trying textproc/meld, I discovered that
the lang/python27 configure process concludes, erroneously, that FreeBSD
does not support working Posix semaphores. In particular, this program
from the configure script was alleged to fail, according to config.log:
#include
On 10/25/14 18:16, Henry Hu wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 2:38 PM, George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com
wrote:
In the process of building and trying textproc/meld, I discovered that
the lang/python27 configure process concludes, erroneously, that FreeBSD
does not support working Posix
Can we expect security updates at some point to any of these ports on
the 2014Q4 branch?
firefox-esr-31.2.0,1
flac-1.3.0_2
freetype2-2.5.3_2
libpurple-2.10.9_7
libxul-31.2.0
linux-c6-openssl-1.0.1e
nss-3.17.2
pidgin-2.10.9_4
thunderbird-31.2.0
Thanks for your attention.
... that got us some of our needed security updates, but firefox-esr
won't build with graphics/jpeg any more, as the configure script wants
the JCS_EXTENSIONS features from graphics/jpeg-turbo. So I did a
portmaster -o graphics/jpeg-turbo jpeg and it claims to have updated
the dependencies of
I have both python 2.7.8 and python 3.3.5 installed on my machine. When
I build lang/python-doc-html, I end up with python-doc-html-2.7.8. Is
it possible to also get python-doc-html-3.3.5 generated and installed
somehow? -- George
On 12/27/14 22:36, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 28/12/2014 11:15, George Mitchell wrote:
I have both python 2.7.8 and python 3.3.5 installed on my machine. When
I build lang/python-doc-html, I end up with python-doc-html-2.7.8. Is
it possible to also get python-doc-html-3.3.5 generated
On 05/15/15 07:11, George Mitchell wrote:
Nightly security report sez:
Checking for packages with security vulnerabilities:
Database fetched: Thu May 14 03:10:05 EDT 2015
apache-openoffice-4.1.1_9
[...]
And now Don Lewis has removed this erroneous entry from the data base of
vulnerabilities
Nightly security report sez:
Checking for packages with security vulnerabilities:
Database fetched: Thu May 14 03:10:05 EDT 2015
apache-openoffice-4.1.1_9
I first got this last week for version 4.1.1_7 and consequently updated
my ports tree and rebuilt, specifically including changeset 385792:
On 02/08/16 04:55, John Marino wrote:
> On 2/8/2016 10:30 AM, Mathias Picker wrote:
>> [...]
>> To comment on the original bug report: removing portmaster from
>> documentation seems to be a bit premature. It's working fine for me,
>> and it seems quite a lot simpler to me than synth, which makes
On 04/28/16 07:01, Michael Jung wrote:
> [...]
> If you really want to try and build it on that system and have some free
> disk
> space you could always add a file instead of a partition as extra swap.
>
> Instuctions here:
>
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/adding-swap-space.html
>
>
On 02/08/17 03:03, Julian Elischer wrote:
> [...]
> I'm discouraged to not hear back from any of the ports 'committee'.
> [...]
Possibly because this has been the topic of a number of rancorous
mail threads in the last few months already, and everybody is
fatigued. What there *hasn't* been is a
On 02/16/17 03:44, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 16 Feb, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>
>>> For every build -
>>> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf
>>
>>> OPTIONS_SET= OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS SIMD PGSQL IPV6
>>> editors_vim_SET= CSCOPE X11 GTK3 PYTHON
>
> Yeah, I really like this a lot more than going
On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> portmaster, a tool used/loved/hated, is almost in abandoned state.
> I'm a portmaster user, because, in some cases, it fits my needs.
> In other cases, I use other tools, like poudriere or synth, that are
> really great.
> I don't want to
On 02/16/17 15:33, Baho Utot wrote:
>
>
> On 02/16/17 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>> Baho Utot writes:
>>
>>> On 02/16/17 06:08, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
I'm looking for constructive critics, feedbacks, anything that can
help me to make portmaster an
On 02/17/17 02:37, abi wrote:
> 17.02.2017 00:22, Chris H пишет:
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:48:57 -0500 Baho Utot
>> wrote
>>
>>> [...]
>> Hello. You shouldn't have any difficulty accomplishing your goal
>> by simply setting up a jail, and using portmaster within that
On 10/04/16 23:18, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 3/10/2016 5:14 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> [...]
>> The bare minimum will never be the default. The default is what will
>> fit most people, so that they can use our packages out of the box.
>>
> I didn't say it should be the default, I said it
On 09/27/16 20:56, Carlos J. Puga Medina wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> Yes, I had the same problem like you. So you only need to define your
> default SSL version in /etc/make.conf
>
> See entry 20160616 in /usr/ports/UPDATING for further details.
>
> Regards,
>
Okay, /etc/make.conf now says:
Before I file a PR, does this failure look familiar to anyone?
portmaster -BDg security/ca_root_nss
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/security/ca_root_nss
===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for security/ca_root_nss in background
===>>> Gathering dependency list for security/ca_root_nss from
Thanks for the pointer! -- George
On 09/27/16 21:39, Carlos J. Puga Medina wrote:
> I forgot to mention that this problem has been reported:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212921
>
> El 28 de septiembre de 2016 3:20:
On 09/28/16 02:59, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 28.09.2016 um 01:51 schrieb George Mitchell:
>> Before I file a PR, does this failure look familiar to anyone?
>>
>> portmaster -BDg security/ca_root_nss
>
>> ===> Building for ca_root_nss-3.26
>> ## Untruste
On 12/08/16 09:14, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:28:02PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:16:24AM +, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
>>> Hello guys!
>>> [...]
>> Have you considered using things like poudriere that would allow you to build
>> your own
On 12/12/16 20:11, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2016-12-12 18:57, The Doctor wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 03:16:35PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> On 2016-12-12 15:08, The Doctor wrote:
>>> > I am seeing issues with
>>> > Thunderbird
>>> >
>>> > IMAP and POP3
>>> >
>>> > and
>>> >
>>> >
On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
>
>> On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
>>>
>>> Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an
>>> outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So
>>> use it or die.
On 12/06/16 21:59, Jason Unovitch wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:48:20PM +, Ben Woods wrote:
>> On Tue., 6 Dec. 2016 at 4:44 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>
>>> they are effectively useless because the results are not archived, and
>>> the quarterly pkg branch actually
On 12/02/16 19:40, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Be there an implementation of FOCAL? I have a hankering to get back to my
> early programming days :-)
>
The Wikipedia page has a few links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOCAL_%28programming_language%29
-- George
On 12/18/16 19:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been working for a while on 2 long standing feature request for the
> ports
> tree: flavors and subpackages.
> [...]
Off topic, I know, but might this eventually lead to FLAVORS for base?
I would be so grateful to have a
On 12/26/16 03:11, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> [...]
> What is the current status of portupgrade and portmaster?
>
> Maintained, deprecated or something else?
>
> Tom
> [...]
If "contentious" were an official state, that would be it. Each has
its enthusiastic adherents; others are, shall we say,
On 04/14/17 08:37, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Cloudflare deployed a bunch (74 apparently) of new f-root dns
> servers, which do not permit AXFR like the other f-root instances
> do.
> [...]
> A good alternative could be to change named.conf to use
> lax.xfr.dns.icann.org and
On 04/16/17 05:30, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> On 04/16/2017 04:02 AM, George Mitchell wrote:
>> On 04/14/17 08:37, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Cloudflare deployed a bunch (74 apparently) of new f-root dns
>>> servers, w
FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p20
ports/head -r447625
www/firefox-esr insists that sqlite3 be compiled with SQLITE_ENABLE_FTS3
Attached patch allows compilation to complete and results in a working
firefox (though I don't it's completely correct).-- George
Index:
On 08/09/17 17:49, Jan Beich wrote:
> George Mitchell <george+free...@m5p.com> writes:
> [...]
>> ports/head -r447625
>>[...]
> See https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/447626
> [...]
Missed it by that much! -- George
signature.as
At svn revision 443684.
After "make clean extract":
work/firefox-45.9.0esr/.mozconfig does not exist.
No file under www/libxul contains the string "--enable-jemalloc=4".
In particular, no patch file in the files directory refers to
.mozconfig or contains "--enable-jemalloc=4".
But after "make
On 06/23/17 00:49, Jan Beich wrote:
> George Mitchell <george+free...@m5p.com> writes:
>
>> Consequently, the configure script dies at line 26248, complaining
>> that "Option, jemalloc, does not take an argument (4)".
>
> Sorry for the bus
On 05/17/17 08:00, tech lists wrote:
> [...]
> What I did was this, after seeing David's very helpful email to the
> list:
>
> pkg delete -f libEGL-17.0.3 libGL-17.0.3 libglesv2-17.0.3 gbm-17.0.3
> libglapi-17.0.3 dri-17.0.3.2
> [...]
More generally:
pkg delete -f libEGL libGL libglesv2 gbm
On 06/02/17 06:24, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
> [...]
> Sadly, it is/
> was the best option for users looking to migrate to a "modern" tool for
> whom poudriere was too much.
>
Meaning no disrespect to anyone who makes positive contributions to
the FreeBSD project, let's not forget that synth's
On 09/23/17 15:46, Kurt Buff wrote:
> All,
>
> Upgraded from 10.3 to 11.0-RELEASE-p12
>
> Deleted all installed ports, and am trying to reinstall them with
> portmaster, building from source, with the following command line:
> portmaster -d --no-confirm --no-term-title --delete-packages
On 10/06/17 04:20, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 08:13:42AM +, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:15:18PM +, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Michael
On 10/04/17 12:16, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing tech edits on the new edition of "Absolute FreeBSD," and
> stumbled into what's apparently a delicate topic.
>
> Some of my reviewers are happy I included portmaster in the book.
>
> Some reviewers beg me not to include it. [...]
On 10/05/17 18:13, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>> [...]
>> Seem a reasonable request? If [found] so, I'll solicit for qualified
>> individuals to work with me on it in a new thread.
>>
>> Thanks for your time, and consideration
>
> [...]
> Let me know what you need. I'll give you whatever support I
On 09/26/17 10:37, George Mitchell wrote:
> On 09/26/17 10:05, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> [...]
>> This has been a long awaiting feature, most of the work has been done by
>> bapt, bdrewery and antoine, I am just the one actually doing the
>> announce and commit and all.
On 09/26/17 10:05, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> [...]
> This has been a long awaiting feature, most of the work has been done by
> bapt, bdrewery and antoine, I am just the one actually doing the
> announce and commit and all.
> [...]
What is the last SVN revision without the changes? I just updated a
On 10/04/17 14:14, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:21:26AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Steve Kargl <
>> s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Poudriere really
FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p24
FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (from base)
GNU gdb 6.1.1 (from base)
I'm trying to debug a crash in the multimedia/tvheadend 4.2.3 server on
the above system when playing a recorded program on tvheadend's Android
client. It reliably crashes when I try to fast forward. But
On 12/09/17 00:42, Chris H wrote:
> [...] So I'd like to respectfully request that Sendmail stays.
> All those in favor, say aye!
> [...]
A Y Y E !
A A Y Y E !
A Y EEE !
A A Y E
A A Y E ! -- George
signature.asc
On 12/05/17 02:35, Stefan Esser wrote:
> [...]
> Is it acceptable, to have portmaster stop supporting the old package system?
> AFAIK, there is no way that a modern ports tree with flavor support works
> with a non-PKG_NG infrastructure?
>
> Regards, STefan
> [...]
One vote here for dropping old
On 12/05/17 03:13, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 04/12/2017 à 18:33, Steve Kargl a écrit :
>> [...]
>> This does not document the change in ports/UPDATING. FreeBSD
>> users have been told to check {src/ports}/UPDATING for 20+
>> years. A change that fundamentally changes the way users
>> interact
On 01/29/18 07:31, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> [...]
> Mmmm, maybe make clean with the default flavor could clean all flavors.
>
Sorry to jump in when I probably don't know what I'm talking about,
but I hope we would distinguish here between "no flavor specified"
and "default flavor specified."
On 01/01/18 13:33, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> I would like to thank all programmers and port maintainers for their
> excellent work in 2017.
> Without you we would never enjoy BSD as we do until this very day.
>
> I really hope that you will keep up the good work in 2018 also!
>
> Thanks,
> Jos
On 07/30/18 07:02, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> I am working on a port that requires many other ports to be built with
> specific options selected.
>
> Is there any way to have a port enables options in it's dependencies?
>
> Best,
> Owen
> [...]
If the port you need offers the option as a flavor,
On 12/15/18 1:10 PM, George Mitchell wrote:
> I recently updated my port build machine to 11.2-RELEASE. I'm in the
> process of recompiling my (previously) 10.4-based ports to 11.2, and
> perhaps I shouldn't be trying to do this incrementally. [...]
Sure enough, deleting all ports and
On 12/16/18 5:24 PM, Stefan Esser wrote:
> [...]
> I have (my version of) portmaster mostly working in a clean chroot jail.
> It is still a pure shell script (works with the FreeBSD /bin/sh and bash),
> thus portable to all architectures supported by FreeBSD (e.g. ARM).
>
> There are a few edge
On 12/13/18 10:06 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> [...] So long as you have sufficient disk space
> and you aren't trying to rebuild the entire ports tree, it can work well
> on a very ordinary desktop machine. [...]
Still getting used to the idea that a machine with >16GB would today
be considered a
I recently updated my port build machine to 11.2-RELEASE. I'm in the
process of recompiling my (previously) 10.4-based ports to 11.2, and
perhaps I shouldn't be trying to do this incrementally. But the build
for thunderbird fails at ports revision 487523 with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE in
But I forgot that, and ended up with both /lib/libreadline.so.8
AND /usr/local/lib/libreadline.so.8 on my machine, leading to woe
when compiling the latest lang/python36. Unfortunately, the base
version readline was quite a bit older than the one from ports.
Nevertheless, the ports version is
On 4/14/19 9:07 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 6:26 PM George Mitchell
> wrote:
>>
>> But I forgot that, and ended up with both /lib/libreadline.so.8
>> AND /usr/local/lib/libreadline.so.8 on my machine, leading to woe
>> when comp
I tried compiling a debugging version of firefox:
cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make clean; make WITH_DEBUG=yes install
The resulting binary had no debug symbols. What did I do wrong?
-- George
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2019-05-06 04:33, Michael Zhilin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> pstack shows firefox methods for example:
> [...]
Thanks for the suggestion, but in practice I get:
(core file "firefox.core"): /usr/local/bin/firefox
- thread -1 (running) -
0x80208d47a (11b76432,
On 2019-05-06 00:49, Robert Huff wrote:
> [...]
> Has anyone asked the maintainer, which I believe is
> "ge...@freebsd.org"?
> [...]
I have done so now; thanks!-- George
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2019-04-10 15:11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2019, at 19:37, George Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> Yesterday I went through a round of updating and compiling ports. By
>> all outward appearances it was successful. But this morning's daily
>> status report reve
Yesterday I went through a round of updating and compiling ports. By
all outward appearances it was successful. But this morning's daily
status report revealed that clang had crashed on a signal 11 once
while compiling each qt5 package. (For once, it was useful to have
the "such-and-such
On 2019-04-10 15:42, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2019, at 21:29, George Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> On 2019-04-10 15:11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>>[...]
>>> I don't see any crash report(s) in the typescript? Did clang drop two
>>> files (a .sh and pre
Apparently the definitions of various structures found in
/usr/local/include/mtdev.h from libmtdev-1.1.5_2 conflict with
the definitions /usr/include/dev/evdev/input.h from base.
This is in the middle of a portmaster qt5 upgrade, trying to
reinstall qt5-gui-5.12.2_1. I didn't see anything in
On 2019-10-09 10:25, Alexander Leidinger via freebsd-ports wrote:
> Quoting George Mitchell (from Wed, 9 Oct 2019
> 10:12:39 -0400):
>
>> Apparently the definitions of various structures found in
>> /usr/local/include/mtdev.h from libmtdev-1.1.5_2 conflict with
>> t
On 2020-02-08 15:12, Andy Farkas wrote:
>
> Hi, seems to be a fairly quiet weekend so...
>
> I am building a new desktop workstation to replace my aging 8-yo one
> that has been as reliable as the sun rising every morning.
>
> I build things using portmaster and select options that are
On 2020-01-01 16:23, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
>> On 1. Jan 2020, at 10:18 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>> [...]
>> This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere.
>
> Let me stop you right here and say: ports Framework itself is
> suffering from this wishful attitude
PLUS
On 2020-04-17 20:19, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Dimitry Andric writes:
>
>> But basically, expect all python 2.x using ports to go away, unless
>> they get fixed to use python 3.x, or no python at all.
>
> Is there a method whereby - given a list of installed ports using
> python 2 - one
On 2020-04-30 21:31, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> [...]
> PS I've not the foggiest what Tauthon is , so searched
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Tauthon=Go=1
> The page "Tauthon" does not exist.
> cd /usr/ports ; cd */*tauthon* # */*tauthon*: No match.
On 2020-08-24 18:21, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> [ cross posted across several mailing lists, please respect reply-to ]
>
> Hi!
>
> It is time to deprecate drm-legacy-kmod [...] it is time for it to go.
>
> The driver will remain for a transition period. For FreeBSD 13-CURRENT,
> this will be
On 2020-07-31 16:04, George Mitchell wrote:
> Locally, I have changed my default version of python to 3.8.
> [... etc. ...]
Apparently kib@ fixed this when I wasn't looking, and all is well
now. Thank you! -- George
signature.asc
Description: O
Locally, I have changed my default version of python to 3.8.
Specifically, in my etc/make.conf, I have:
DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.8 python3=3.8
However, www/chromium/Makefile erroneously says:
${CP} ${PYTHONBASE}/lib/python3.7/site-packages/xcbgen/*.py \
On 2020-06-14 09:10, George Mitchell wrote:
> I do package builds on one machine on my (small) network, using
> portmaster, and then distributes the built packages to my other
> machines. Last week, I decided to make python38, rather than
> python37, my default version on Python 3.
I do package builds on one machine on my (small) network, using
portmaster, and then distributes the built packages to my other
machines. Last week, I decided to make python38, rather than
python37, my default version on Python 3. Specifically,
portmaster -o lang/python38 python37
I think I
On 2020-06-28 16:07, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote:
> [...]
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
> File "tools/genv8constants.py", line 23, in
>
> bufsize=-1, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, text=True).stdout
>
> TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument
On 2020-07-23 17:37, George Mitchell wrote:
> On 2020-07-20 11:09, George Mitchell wrote:
>> Running on 11.3-RELEASE-p11, amd64, ports tree at 542641 (head branch).
>> For some reason, firefox depends on devel/rust-cbindgen. I don't know
>> what that
On 2020-07-20 11:09, George Mitchell wrote:
> Running on 11.3-RELEASE-p11, amd64, ports tree at 542641 (head branch).
> For some reason, firefox depends on devel/rust-cbindgen. I don't know
> what that is, but it fails thus:
> [...]
That problem has gone away with a ports tree updat
Running on 11.3-RELEASE-p11, amd64, ports tree at 542641 (head branch).
For some reason, firefox depends on devel/rust-cbindgen. I don't know
what that is, but it fails thus:
===> Configuring for rust-cbindgen-0.14.3_1
thread 'main' panicked at 'couldn't initialize the libgit2 library: -1,
On 11/28/20 7:42 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Try building with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE and the actual problem will be at the
end. Of course, it will take a lot longer to get to the error as you
will only compile on a single processor thread.
[...]
As of ports/head revision 556447, I get the following error trying to
compile apache-openoffice:
1 module(s):
ucb
need(s) to be rebuilt
Reason(s):
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.8/main/ucb/source/ucp/ftp
When you have fixed the
On 11/30/20 1:31 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
> [...]
> Hmn, that still looks a lot like a multi-threaded build. If you still
> have the build tree around, try this:
>
>/usr/local/bin/bash
>cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.8/main
>source FreeBSDAMDEnv.Set.sh
>cd ucb
>
My thanks to Don Lewis for helping fix the problem. I needed to
recompile ftp/curl with its default options (specifically, with
ALTSVC and COOKKIES set). It's all fine now!-- George
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/27/20 8:29 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
[...]
What FreeBSD version and architecture? What ports tree revision?
Anything unusual in make.conf or non-default option settings?
The package builders are not seeing this, and I'm not seeing this on my
11.4-STABLE and fairly recent 13-CURRENT builds on
On 11/28/20 7:42 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Try building with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE and the actual problem will be at the
end. Of course, it will take a lot longer to get to the error as you
will only compile on a single processor thread.
[...]Trying this now; expecting results tomorrow morning.
On 11/28/20 7:19 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
[...]
Hmn ...
The "infinite recursion" warnings have been around for a while. They
don't seem to break the build, but have been fixed upstream for 4.2.0
whenever that gets released. I hadn't seen the "&& with constant operand"
warning before. It looks
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo