Hi,
~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:0:2::e
~ $ echo -e "dir mathopd*\nquit" | ftp
ftp://204.152.184.73/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/pac
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:09:57PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > ~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
> > ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
> > ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
> > ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
> > ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:0:2::e
> > ~
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:37:38AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > > ~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
> > > > ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
> > > > ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
> > > > ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
> > > > ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:32:06PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
> >ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
> >ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
> >ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
> >ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:
In ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-stable/
all files seem to be dated June 04, 2012 or older.
Package generation for i386 broken?
No such problem for amd64:
~ $ ftp ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/
Trying 204.152.184.73...
Connected to ftp.freebsd.org.
220 Welcome t
> In ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-stable/
> all files seem to be dated June 04, 2012 or older.
There is a package
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-9-packages-latest/www/firefox-13.0.1,1.tbz
built on June 27
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-9-latest-
8.3-RELEASE-p2 i386. After the last multimedia/vlc update
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/171632
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/multimedia/vlc/Makefile.diff?r1=1.301;r2=1.302;f=h
`make config` doesn't show checkboxes for options:
┌
> 8.3-RELEASE-p2 i386. After
> update
> `make config` doesn't show checkboxes for options
> May be it works in FreeBSD 9 and later,
> but in 8 and earlier the 'make config' dialog behaves differently.
Same problem with www/firefox and possibly some other ports,
but no problem with most other port
~ $ lynx -head -dump http://www.freebsd.org/ports/INDEX-8.bz2
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Content-Type: application/x-bzip
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "3168074"
Last-Modified: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:23:32 GMT
Content-Length: 1660938
Connection: close
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:29:33 GMT
Server: httpd/1.4.x LaHonda
The last java/icedtea-web/Makefile update
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/java/icedtea-web/Makefile.diff?r1=1.24;r2=1.25;f=h
adds:
USE_GECKO= libxul
What for?
I have www/firefox installed including /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so .
Why do I need now to build and install also www
> I'm using palemoon as fallback browser, which has other issues.
> Not the least the removal due to security issues from the ports tree.
> I still build it, and it still builds 8-}
Do you build Palemoon 27.9.4 or 28.6.1?
Slack and Google's reCAPTCHA don't work in Palemoon 27. :(
What am I missing?
pkg-1.14.7 < needs updating (port has 1.15.4)
~ # pkg rquery %v pkg
1.14.7
~ $ lynx -head -dump
http://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:11:i386/latest/packagesite.txz
...
Last-Modified: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 07:16:10 GMT
Other mirrors too:
~ $ lynx -head -dump
http://pkg0
After last packages update for 11.4 i386 latest,
why does `pkg upgrade` want to install "cliqz" web-browser?
freshports.org claims "There are no ports dependent upon this port".
New packages to be INSTALLED:
cliqz: 1.38.0_4
libglvnd: 1.3.2
sndio: 1.7.0
Installed packages t
> > After last packages update for 11.4 i386 latest,
> > why does `pkg upgrade` want to install "cliqz" web-browser?
> > freshports.org claims "There are no ports dependent upon this port".
> >
> > New packages to be INSTALLED:
> > cliqz: 1.38.0_4
> > libglvnd: 1.3.2
> > snd
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> I have an old 6.4-R machine which I can take as far as RELENG_6, but no
> further due to a hardware-support issue (special hardware, third party
> driver). The hardware needs to live a while yet, so I'd like to try to get
> the installed ports as up to date as possible. T
> In an announcement it was said...
>
> > We are now glad to announce that binary packages available again for
> > 8.x, 9.x branches on i386 and amd64 architectures
>
> Note that the packages for ""8.x"", ie: "packages-8-stable" on i386 and
> amd64, are still 7-8 months old.
"packages-9-stable"
> I build my custom kernel without IPv6 since I'm not going to be using
> it any time soon. The mtr port doesn't work anymore
> What can I do to fix this without enabling a useless (to me) option in my
> kernel and rebuilding?
Downgrade the mtr port to mtr-nox11-0.82_1.
I update ports tree with `
> > > I build my custom kernel without IPv6 since I'm not going to be using
> > > it any time soon. The mtr port doesn't work anymore
> > Downgrade the mtr port to mtr-nox11-0.82_1.
> > I update ports tree with `portsnap` and use `svn export`
> > (devel/subversion port) for downgrading a single p
8.4-RELEASE-p4 i386, not pkgng, freshly upgated ports tree,
libxul rebuilt after pixman upgrade.
$ pkg_info | grep gcc
gcc-4.6.3 GNU Compiler Collection 4.6
/var/db/ports/www_gecko-mediaplayer/options :
# This file is auto-generated by 'make config'.
# Options for gecko-mediaplayer-1.0.
portupgrade uses db41. Should portupgrade be rebuilt with db5 ? How?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> Is anyone else seeing this error building
> archivers/libmspack
> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-unused-result"
Me too. I have "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in make.conf.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
> From: Andrey Chernov
> With recent ports tree on stable-10 i386 attempting to build lang/gcc
> always cause segfault at this place.
> /usr/ports/lang/gcc/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd10.1/libstdc++-v3/include/valarray:1233:1:
> internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> } // namespace
>
> From: Baptiste Daroussin
> there's a know regression with syscons and kernel video
> drivers: you can't switch back to a console once an X.Org session is
> started. A new console driver called vt(4) fixes this issue
Does 10.1 with vt in text mode support _all_ the following in rc.conf?
scrnma
> From: Jean-S?bastien P?dron
> NVIDIA users are not impacted by this change at all.
x11/nvidia-driver-304 (for older videochips) too?
> the NVIDIA driver (like
> old Intel/AMD UMS drivers) takes care of restoring the GPU in a state
> that syscons can use (eg. VGA text mode on a PC).
What abou
> From: Serpent7776
> When I'm trying to start chrome I get Bus error.
> backtrace from gdb78:
> #0 0x000805e3a815 in getframeaddr () from /usr/local/lib/libexecinfo.so.1
> #1 0x000805e339d3 in backtrace () from /usr/local/lib/libexecinfo.so.1
> #2 0x00b8118e in ?? ()
> #3 0x
Does the latest version of the port misc/iso-codes really need python 3
for build?
Python 2.7 not enough?
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/misc/iso-codes/Makefile?r1=409133&r2=420522
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.
> From: Marko Cupa?
> install: ./functions/locale/cs_CZ.UTF-8/cs_CZ.UTF8: Too many levels of
> symbolic links *** Error code 71
Examine (with `ls -l`) each dir of that path. You'll see
a symbolic link poining to itself. Delete it with `rm`.
___
freebsd-
FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p4 i386, ports tree freshly updated with portsnap,
not pkgng, nothing about directories in make.conf,
the /usr/ports/packages/ directory deleted (in order to not waste disk space) -
that worked until today. Now:
===> Building package for libiconv-1.14_3
Creating package /usr/p
In `man curl`:
--krb
(FTP) Enable Kerberos authentication and use. The level must be
entered and should be one of 'clear', 'safe', 'confidential', or
'private'. Should you use a level that is not one of these,
'private' will ins
> > As a work-around it may be possible to install the devel/bmake port and
> > use it for port management.
> Yes this should work. Install devel/bmake, then use 'bmake' instead of
> 'make' when interacting with the ports tree. Or install devel/fmake and
> use 'fmake'. Either works.
Or download 8
30 matches
Mail list logo