Hello all.
I was directed to this list as a place to report problems with ports.
But the general information at
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports makes me
wonder whether I was misdirected and should be reporting them
elsewhere. Could someone advise? Thanks.
Margaret
Since as yet xfce4 doesn't exist as a package, I tried to build
xfce4 under 10.2 RELEASE using only defaults.
But the build fails in x11-toolkits because printbackend-cups.so
is not found. -files.so and -lpr.so exist, but -cups.so does not
That happened AFTER it spent 4.5 hours downloading a
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 08:36:16 -0400, I wrote:
>Since as yet xfce4 doesn't exist as a package
I was wrong - it does, and works very nicely too. I'm just too
used to version numbers on pkgs, so I looked for xfce4.
(But there is a missing file in the port, and the kitchen-sink
model really is a
[Default] On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 09:47:10 +0100, Mike Clarke
wrote:
>For cases where one line comments won't suffice how about providing the
>facility
>to include an extra text file in a port (perhaps "pkg-options") containing
>notes about why some particular options
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:02:46 +0200, Mathieu Arnold
wrote:
>Le 26/09/2016 à 21:42, scratch65...@att.net a écrit :
>> I have the PHP 7.0 package installed under 10.2. Wanting to
>> install the pecl-imagick port, I called pkg search, which
>> returned a ref. I only caught the
[Default] On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:40:33 +0200, Miroslav Lachman
<000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>scratch65...@att.net wrote on 09/26/2016 21:42:
>> I have the PHP 7.0 package installed under 10.2. Wanting to
>> install the pecl-imagick port, I called pkg search, which
>> returned a ref. I only caught