Re: FreeBSD Port: sysutils/daemontools

2006-07-19 Thread RW
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 23:06, Alan Aldrich wrote: > Not having any luck installing this port > > [3:01pm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/sysutils/daemontools] make install clean > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > => daemontools-0.76.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports

Re: conflicting dependency

2006-07-20 Thread RW
On Thursday 20 July 2006 01:30, John E Hein wrote: > Let's say there are two ports A & B. > They both provide libfoo.so.1 (and so register CONFLICTS with each other). > > Now port C wants to use libfoo (and doesn't care if it gets it > from A or B). > > What does port C list in it's LIB_DEPENDS? >

Re: portinstall breaks with -m "-j 4"

2006-07-23 Thread RW
On Saturday 22 July 2006 22:13, Mark Linimon wrote: > > BTW, I apologize for this is not at all a portupgrade issue, but an issue > > of the ports system. > > It is an issue with individual ports -- actually not the "port" (e.g. > Makefile framework, pkg-*) but the individual applications (IIUC). >

Re: Force rebuild/reinstall dependent ports

2009-05-23 Thread RW
On Sat, 23 May 2009 20:22:03 -0400 Robert Huff wrote: > > Marcin Rzepecki writes: > > > But why won't port do this automatically? Is there a way to force > > it before installing updated port version? > > Revuilding a dependency (here, dovecot) does not always > require rebuilding the

Re: portsnap can't access portsnap[124].freebsd.org

2009-05-30 Thread RW
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:05:44 +1000 John Marshall wrote: > > Have you excluded local factors (proxy servers, firewalls)? Try fetching the key manually fetch http://portsnap2.FreeBSD.org/pub.ssl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists

Re: FreeBSD Port: mail/p5-FuzzyOcr-devel

2009-05-30 Thread RW
On Sun, 31 May 2009 00:58:30 +0300 Ismail YENIGUL wrote: > Hi, > > I sent an update for this port > (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135065) I also would like > to be maintainer of this port. > It doesn't seem sensible that p5-FuzzyOcr contains an obsolete version that's not recomme

Re: [x11/nvidia-driver] conflicts with linux dri ports

2009-06-07 Thread RW
On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 14:28:58 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > Hi! > > > I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver and > other linux dri ports to be in conflict. > > If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to replace > libGL.so with a link to nvidia librar

Re: [x11/nvidia-driver] conflicts with linux dri ports

2009-06-07 Thread RW
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:06:56 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:34:53 +0200 barbara wrote: > > > > I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver > > > and other linux dri ports to be in conflict. > > > > > > If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driv

Re: Port of "service" command

2009-06-09 Thread RW
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:30:44 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > Kevin Downey wrote: > > I have a similar shell function I am rather fond of: > > > > rc(){ > > find /etc/rc.d/"$1" /usr/local/etc/rc.d/"$1" -exec sudo {} `echo > > "$*"|cut -f 2- -d \ ` \; > > } > > Wow, that's painful. :) The only rea

Re: Safe to run squid_user=root ?

2009-06-17 Thread RW
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:48:17 -0500 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: > www/squid30 sets up an rc.d startup script that includes > >squid_user=${squid_user:-squid} > > This makes it impossible to get squid to listen on a port lower than > 1024. > > If I specify > > squid_user=root > > in my rc.

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

2009-06-24 Thread RW
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:53:13 +0300 Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:13:53PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > [snip] > > Though I still reserve the right to hate the inconsistent use of 'z' > > (why internationalize but surmise; > > I guess "surmise" just hasn't been US-ized yet :P I

Re: ports/*/jpeg "Thanks a lot guys"

2009-08-01 Thread RW
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:10:17 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > The OP does have a valid point though. I just got an e-mail from > Freshports saying that a bunch of ports I maintain had had > PORTREVISION bumps because of the jpeg update. Which is all fine and > dandy, except that these were the www

Re: graphics/gocr

2009-08-11 Thread RW
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:40:16 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > Sourceforge seems to have gone re-direct happy. Downloading anything > from there seems to require following at least two 302 redirects -- > eg: > Notice how it's forced me to go to the Kent mirror? (Not that I'm > complaining -- UKC

SpamAssassin - reinstall removes GPG keys

2009-08-12 Thread RW
Every time SpamAssassin is upgraded or "rebuilt", the sa-learn keyring directory gets removed during the pkg_delete. Is there a good reason for this? Is there a workaround? Specifying an alternate directory as an option to sa-learn seems a bit clumsy. ___

Re: SpamAssassin - reinstall removes GPG keys

2009-08-13 Thread RW
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:37:37 +0100 RW wrote: > > Every time SpamAssassin is upgraded or "rebuilt", the sa-learn keyring > directory gets removed during the pkg_delete. Is there a good reason > for this? > > Is there a workaround? Specifying an alternate director

Re: Stopping portupgrade safely

2009-08-26 Thread RW
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:20:02 -0700 wrote: > Hi > > What is the safe way to stop portupgrade? > Try to stop it during the build stage or one of the prebuild stages (extract, configure etc). If it's installing, or updating any kind of database, leave it until it starts fetching or extracting fo

Re: which gcc ports should be install freebsd 7.2 p3 amd64?

2009-08-26 Thread RW
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:44:05 -0700 wrote: > Hi > > As the Subject. > > I have just upgraded to amd64 7.2 p3 on an Intel quad core system > > # pkg_info |grep gcc > gcc-3.4.6_3,1 > gccmakedep-1.0.2 > gccxml-0.6.0 > > > This system has a large number of ports installed and is not short of > me

Dovecot Sieve port switched from CMU Sieve to Dovecot

2009-08-27 Thread RW
When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot deliver stopped working. It appears that not only has the sieve plugin been upgraded, but it's switched from the CMU version to Dovecot's own implementation. This should be documented in UPDATING - it's not covered by the previous Dovecot note. http://w

Re: Dovecot Sieve port switched from CMU Sieve to Dovecot

2009-08-27 Thread RW
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:50:37 +0800 Denny Lin wrote: > > > When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot deliver stopped working. > > It appears that not only has the sieve plugin been upgraded, but > > it's switched from the CMU version to Dovecot's own implementation. > > This should be documented

Re: random fetch location

2009-10-05 Thread RW
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:54:45 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > Guoqin Ren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Maybe it's a naive question. When I install a package from ports, > > it often needs to fetch some files. But sometimes it takes a long > > time before finding an available server to fetch. I also notice >

Re: dkimproxy rc script

2009-10-11 Thread RW
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:02:18 +0200 ML wrote: > Hello, > > currently dkimproxy rc scripts don’t handle the status rc command > Status doesn't usually need any special handling unless it's something a little more exotic like multiple daemons; it should "just work", provided run_rc_command can fi

Re: portupgrade - working directory curioisty

2009-10-26 Thread RW
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:36:10 +0100 David Southwell wrote: > Hi > > I had the following > > dns1# portupgrade > -a Cannot locate current working directory: No such file or > directory > > # df showed /var was present with only 2% used. > # pkgdb -F showed up to date pkgdb with no errors > >

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

2009-11-10 Thread RW
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:32:28 +0200 Peter Pentchev wrote: > The Ports Collection's distfile checksums make sure that you get > exactly the same files *as the port maintainer examined at some > previous moment in time*. More importantly it guards against maliciously modified source code. Someone

Re: rc.d scripts and REQUIRE part

2009-11-20 Thread RW
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:38:58 +0100 Xavier Beaudouin wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to understand how to customize rc.d scripts to get the > right startup sequence for all daemons. > > Seems we have (my case havp, but it is also the same problem for > example monit) : > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/h

Re: nvidia-driver 64bit version

2009-12-05 Thread RW
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:18:29 + Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > Hi > > > > I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of > > the new beta state nvidia driver [1]. > > Yup, thanks for the pointer. I'm consider

Re: bsd.sites.mk

2009-12-19 Thread RW
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:11:42 -0700 "John J. Rushford Jr" wrote: > Greetings, > > I was wondering if you could move ftp.belnet.be to the bottom of all > lists in bsd.sites.mk. This ftp site is extremely slow and shouldn't > be at the top of the list in my opinion. > Try setting your preferred

Re: pkg_debunk

2009-12-31 Thread RW
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:40:56 + Aleksandar Simic wrote: > Hello, > > I find that when building some ports, the building of its dependencies > tend to fail from time to time. > > So I've created pkg_debunk: http://github.com/dotemacs/pkg_debunk > > It shows you which ports that appear to be

Re: sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin - why is it marked as broken on 8?

2010-01-14 Thread RW
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:29 -0500 Greg Larkin wrote: > The CVS commit in question says that the breakage was reported by > pointyhat (FreeBSD package building cluster): > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin/Makefile#rev1.28 > > In fact, pav@ included the s

Re: postfix-2.6.5 on freebsd 8.0-release

2010-01-18 Thread RW
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:17:50 -0700 Lucas Reddinger wrote: > Hello, > > Upon the installation (``pkg_add -r'') of postfix, I was asked, as > usual, to disable some daily routines. > ... > However, on Freebsd 8.0 release, ``/etc/periodic.conf'' does not > exist. Then create it. _

x11/nvidia-driver-173 build problem

2010-02-21 Thread RW
I'm been unable to build x11/nvidia-driver-173 for a couple of days. What's odd about it is that I no longer have an installed copy, so presumably it must have originally failed on install. ===> Building for nvidia-driver-173.14.25 ===> src (all) cc -O2 -pipe -march=athlon-mp -fno-strict-aliasi

Re: Ports with same name

2010-03-09 Thread RW
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:24:00 +0100 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:01:24 -0800 > Charlie Kester wrote: > > > On Tue 09 Mar 2010 at 10:25:14 PST Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > >On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500 > > >Steven Kreuzer wrote: > > >So where's the problem? sysutils/gag doesn

Re: Enlightenment build failure

2010-03-18 Thread RW
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:47:58 +0100 Piotrek wrote: > When i try to install /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment i end up with > following message: Even when it builds, it's an E17 development snapshot from over 2 years ago. I found it too buggy and incomplete to be any practical use.

Re: Responding to a challenge

2010-04-19 Thread RW
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:03:00 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:22:30 +0100 > Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > By the way, what is "bikeshed" in fbsd context? > > > > This was coined by p...@. > > Basically, it means people will send endless posts on minor issues > because t

Re: squidguard and squid3

2010-04-26 Thread RW
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:50:54 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > For the list: Is there some reason why the default squid port is still > version 2.7? What is the consensus on this? Squid 3.0 was a rewrite of squid in C++ with a reduced feature set. I think the current situation is that there are still

Re: Latest squid update

2010-05-03 Thread RW
On Mon, 03 May 2010 10:37:29 +0200 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > UPDATING says: > > 20100502: > > AFFECTS: users of www/squid* > > AUTHOR: m...@freebsd.org > > > > Starting with squid* the directory containing the default cache > > and log directory was changed from $PREFIX/squid/ to /

Re: Simultaneous encoding using Gogo. (petite port)

2010-05-19 Thread RW
On Wed, 19 May 2010 13:18:52 +0530 Romil Shah wrote: > Hi, > I am using Gogo MP3 encoder for high speed audio encoding. But my > configuration requires multiple simultaneous streams to be encoded to > MP3. I am planning to use SMP's for the simultaneous behaviour. But > looking at the source code

Re: Users and groups kept after a port deinstallation

2010-05-21 Thread RW
On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:23:18 +0100 Florent Thoumie wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:11 AM, David DEMELIER > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I used pkgsrc for a while on NetBSD. I was used to the pkgsrc > > notifications about the users and groups leaves, when some ports are > > removed these leaves ar

Re: Users and groups kept after a port deinstallation

2010-05-22 Thread RW
On Sat, 22 May 2010 03:29:38 -0400 jhell wrote: > Having unused logins on a system is bad! Why? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubsc

Re: Users and groups kept after a port deinstallation

2010-05-22 Thread RW
On Sat, 22 May 2010 07:58:38 -0400 jhell wrote: > On 05/22/2010 07:08, RW wrote: > > On Sat, 22 May 2010 03:29:38 -0400 > > jhell wrote: > > > > > >> Having unused logins on a system is bad! > > > > Why? > > For one example: > This o

Re: Users and groups kept after a port deinstallation

2010-05-22 Thread RW
On Sat, 22 May 2010 11:42:53 -0400 jhell wrote: > Having unused logins on a system is bad! > >>> > >>> Why? > >> > >> For one example: > >> This opens up a point of possible access to the system in which its > >> integrity could be jeopardized. What all the implications are of > >> this is

Re: Users and groups kept after a port deinstallation

2010-05-22 Thread RW
On Sun, 23 May 2010 03:39:53 +0400 Anonymous wrote: > RW writes: > > > On Sat, 22 May 2010 11:42:53 -0400 > > jhell wrote: > >> This is more of a best practices case than what the implications of > >> leaving users in the master.passwd are. > >

Re: Users and groups kept after a port deinstallation

2010-05-23 Thread RW
On Sat, 22 May 2010 23:21:35 -0400 jhell wrote: > You being the originator of the thread called "Users and groups kept > after a port deinstallation" which implies to me that you had a > problem with users left behind on a system am I correct ? No, and the OP and I have different names and emai

Re: Users and groups kept after a port deinstallation

2010-05-23 Thread RW
On Sun, 23 May 2010 07:57:36 +0400 Anonymous wrote: > > You don't have to remember, just look at the UID/GID values, > > ordinary users start at 1001, ports create UIDs < 1000. > > You're presuming non-ordinary users are created only by ports > framework. That's not always the case. I may want

Re: Manually registering dependencies for ports

2010-06-07 Thread RW
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:53:53 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/06/2010 02:10:33, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > > So --- this is what I would do. If I had a set of scripts that I > > wanted to insta

Re: Manually registering dependencies for ports

2010-06-08 Thread RW
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:04:37 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/06/2010 17:34:39, RW wrote: > > If it's a metaport then it does have an origin. > > It certainly needs an origin if some other port is going to depe

Re: Data files and ports

2010-06-11 Thread RW
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:58:50 -0300 Jesse Smith wrote: > I'm trying to port a program which is distributed in two separate > packages from the upstream project. One package contains the > executable program and the other contains data files. The Data > package rarely changes. The idea being packag

apr ports devrandom option

2010-06-16 Thread RW
The devel/apr* ports have an option to use /dev/random, which is on by default. I was wondering under what circumstances anyone would turn that off. As far as I can see switching it off doesn't replace /dev/random with anything else. ___ freebsd-ports

Re: apr ports devrandom option

2010-06-16 Thread RW
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:07:34 -0700 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jun 16, 2010, at 4:01 PM, RW wrote: > > The devel/apr* ports have an option to use /dev/random, which is on > > by default. > > > > I was wondering under what circumstances anyone would turn that > > o

Re: apr ports devrandom option

2010-06-16 Thread RW
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:45:53 -0700 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jun 16, 2010, at 5:00 PM, RW wrote: > > Right, but I'm asking about the "make config" port option, not the > > configure options to apr itself. > > When you enable the option via make conf

Re: MAKE_JOBS and openjdk6

2010-06-25 Thread RW
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:08:22 +0200 David Naylor wrote: > +MAKE_JOBS_UNSAGE=yes ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: flag to tell ports that you are only building for yourself

2010-06-28 Thread RW
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:09:47 -0400 Eitan Adler wrote: > I'd like to add a flag to tell ports that you are building only for > yourself that and optimizations that typically are not enabled could > be turned on. You can do this yourself. If you add in make.conf something like .if defined(BUILD_F

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-19 Thread RW
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:17:38 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > In any case, thanks for expressing your confusion, it's actually > really helpful to get information from the perspective of a new user. I wonder how many new users have read the bugs section of the shar man page, and know how to check suc

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-19 Thread RW
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:07:14 +0400 Anonymous wrote: > RW writes: > > > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:17:38 -0700 > > Doug Barton wrote: > >> In any case, thanks for expressing your confusion, it's actually > >> really helpful to get information from the

Re: MASTER_SITE defined by google search result

2010-07-22 Thread RW
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:17:31 +0200 Emanuel Haupt wrote: > Usually when I find that a port can't fetch the according distfile I > simply google for the distfile with the following search string (e.g. > for rsync): > > intitle:"index of" rsync-3.0.7.tar.gz > > This approach almost always de

Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster

2010-08-06 Thread RW
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:44:09 +0200 Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > It would be extremely nice if there would be a --batch option that > would act like portupgrade. Does setting BATCH in the environment not work? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list ht

Re: It's annoying when something other than rsyncd listens on tco/873

2010-08-16 Thread RW
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:20:31 -0400 jhell wrote: > The problem that I came across was that /usr/local/etc/rc.d is parsed > long after /etc/rc.d contents so adding the BEFORE to the rsync start > script would not help or didn't at that time. That only matters if you need to sort before the early

Re: Port needs source code from another port

2010-08-20 Thread RW
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:05:33 +0400 cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote: > >Good day! >How should i trick port's Makefile to get another port's source > code extracted (make extract) See 5.7.9 in the ports handbook. > and how to get full path to it Presumably relative to your own port. __

Re: portmanager endlessly looping in x11

2010-09-08 Thread RW
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:41:32 -0400 Chuck Robey wrote: > I'm making no mistake tho, moved from > portmanager to portmaster) which doesn't seem to have this uneveness, > so while it takes a whole lot longer to work than portmanager (it > uses slow but sure shell utils for it's databases) I don't k

Re: Double versions installed

2010-09-19 Thread RW
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:07:02 +0200 Jos Chrispijn wrote: > I have now installed two versions of autoconf: > > autoconf-2.13.000227_6 Automatically configure source code on > many Un*x platforms > autoconf-2.67Automatically configure source > code on many Un*x platfor

Dependencies on x11/nvidia-driver for vdpau

2010-09-23 Thread RW
A few ports now have an optional library dependency on x11/nvidia-driver for vdpau support e.g. mplayer. If this is set on a machine that has one of the legacy driver slave ports installed, then x11/nvidia-driver gets installed on top of the legacy driver. I think it would be a good idea if the d

Re: Users needed or not by ports

2010-10-11 Thread RW
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:01:46 +0200 David DEMELIER wrote: > 2. When make deinstall or pkg_delete port_name check if the > user is still needed by other port (if this is possible) > 3. Print a message like "The following users and group are not needed > anymore by the system : xxx yyy" That would

Re: daemontools port options

2010-10-17 Thread RW
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:31:07 -0400 Jerry wrote: > I was wondering if there is any strategic advantage to using the > "S_EARLY" option as opposed to the default setting. You can set that if you need the daemons started by supervise to start earlier. The best know example of this is djbdns dnsca

Re: Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org?

2010-10-21 Thread RW
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards > portsnap5. > > I mean, all these machines are always choosing mirror number five. > > Some are behind squid proxies and using them for portsnap, so I think > this can be exp

Re: portsclean -CDD oddness

2010-11-04 Thread RW
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:46:57 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > On 11/3/2010 9:59 PM, Jimmie James wrote: > > After doing a portupgrade, I've always run portsclean -CDD > > [for reference] > > -C Clean out all the working directories of the ports tree. (cf. > > WRKDIRPREFIX) > > -D Clean out all the dist

Re: Ports system quality

2011-09-01 Thread RW
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:47:40 +0200 Michal Varga wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 04:23 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > > In that case, you should not be updating that rapidly. > > I've covered that aspect earlier in the discussion. There is no option > to 'upgrade less rapidly', as at any single poin

Re: Substitute dependencies?

2011-09-18 Thread RW
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:38:00 + (GMT) Thomas Mueller wrote: > First case I think of is the misc/freebsd-doc-* ports which want > links1, which would be redundant if I already have lynx installed, or > lynx and seamonkey too. > > I don't really like links1, prefer links with graphic capability

Re: Strange issues while upgrading ports

2011-11-25 Thread RW
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:14:40 +0200 Kaya Saman wrote: > I used the: > > portsnap fetch extract upgrade I assume you mean update rather than upgrade. You don't need to run extract and update together. You run extract the first time to extract the full snapshot and then update subsequently. That's

Re: Linux compatibility with more than one Linux installed?

2011-12-06 Thread RW
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:54:18 -0600 Zhihao Yuan wrote: > Not really. The actual thing is, linuxulator is a Linux kernel running > as a FreeBSD kernel module. The only thing FreeBSD kernel do is to > identify the Linux program and to pass it to the Linux kernel. To the > Linux programs inside a GNU

Re: Linux compatibility with more than one Linux installed?

2011-12-06 Thread RW
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:29:03 -0600 Zhihao Yuan wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:21 AM, RW wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:54:18 -0600 > > Zhihao Yuan wrote: > > > > > >> Not really. The actual thing is, linuxulator is a Linux kernel > >> runni

Re: Linux compatibility with more than one Linux installed?

2011-12-06 Thread RW
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:04:59 -0600 Zhihao Yuan wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:45 AM, RW wrote: > > But what I was getting at was the statement "linuxulator is a Linux > > kernel running as a FreeBSD kernel module" which I'm guessing now > > you didn

Re: x11/nvidia-{driver, settings, xconfig}: why not the latest available version (290.10)?

2011-12-23 Thread RW
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:41:42 -0600 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > As an aside, I've also been wondering for quite a while now why the > nvidia-driver port isn't under the x11-drivers category, rather than > simply x11. Not awfully important, just curious. :-) > x11-drivers wasn't created until t

Re: A new and better way to do "make readmes"?

2012-01-28 Thread RW
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:03:25 -0600 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > I've been thinking for a long time that we need a better way to do > "make readmes", one that would be properly integrated into our > ports Mk infrastructure, to take advantage of make's ability to > recognize which files are up-to-dat

Re: making ports on NFS fails sometimes ?

2012-02-02 Thread RW
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:55:19 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > I'm running a port build for "my" preferred ports list (approx. 1500). > > The /usr/ports comes via NFS from an ZFS server. > > Some of the port builds fail because of that. Is this well-known ? > Should I move back to a local disk

Re: x11-wm/windowmaker: saving session not possible any more

2012-02-25 Thread RW
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 07:36:00 +0100 Rainer Hurling wrote: > Thank you for taking time for this. I will follow the discussion over > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.devel > > and only subscribe if I have something to contribute. Just in case you are not aware, if

Re: Fix nvidia-like ports, help needed

2012-02-28 Thread RW
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:36:26 -0800 Freddie Cash wrote: > The problem is when tools like portmaster notice x11/nvidia-driver > (not installed) has a newer version number than x11/nvidia-driver-173 > (installed), and the mesa/dri/drm ports have updates available, and > then builds/installs them in t

Re: portupgrade -> portmaster Rosetta Stone?

2012-03-03 Thread RW
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 07:15:23 -0500 Robert Huff wrote: > > Doug Barton writes: > > > On 3/2/2012 11:06 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > Doug, is there a way to emulate portupgrade's "-k" (keep going) > > > option, to have the remaining list of ports to be built still > > > continue processi

Re: Preferred way of applying OSVERSION-dependend patches

2012-04-01 Thread RW
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:02:15 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > Good day! > > What is a preferred way of doing subj? > > 1. Add an extra-patch-* to files/ subdirectory and apply it depending > of checks in Makefile (.if ${OSVERSION}). > 2. Add an patch-* to files subdirectory that applies

Re: PR's not being picked up (Was Re: becoming a port committor)

2010-11-22 Thread RW
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:22:57 -0800 Charlie Kester wrote: > On Sun 21 Nov 2010 at 22:01:28 PST Janky Jay, III wrote: > > > >Almost anyone who is an only semi-serious port maintainer > > (meaning > >they only have a select few number of ports to maintain and are only > >trying to contribute/par

Re: PR's not being picked up (Was Re: becoming a port committor)

2010-11-22 Thread RW
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:58:56 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, RW > wrote: > > > IMO chapter 10 should either be 3.7 or be merged into 3.6. If > > anything deserves to be under "Quick Porting" it's this. > > > &

Re: portmaster: print /usr/ports/UPDATING on update

2010-12-28 Thread RW
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:55:04 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > When I wrote, "we need a tool with striking similarities to > portaudit" without providing the details I was assuming that people > are already familiar with it, how it works, etc. I don't think it's quite as simple as dealing with vulnera

Re: portmaster: print /usr/ports/UPDATING on update

2010-12-28 Thread RW
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:38:57 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > On 12/28/2010 15:10, RW wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:55:04 -0800 > > Doug Barton wrote: > > on perl). At the moment, I read it once, make a mental note, and > > come back to it when I need it. I don't

Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree

2011-01-19 Thread RW
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:37:45 +0100 Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 19.01.2011 01:33, schrieb Mark Terribile: > > > > Olli Hauer, > > > > I tried to reply to you directly as oha...@freebsd.org and received > > the following error. My message (edited a bit) follows the error. > > > > > > > > ---

Re: Returning with question about SELECTIVELY updating ports tree

2011-01-19 Thread RW
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:35:21 + RW wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:37:45 +0100 > Matthias Andree wrote: > > > Am 19.01.2011 01:33, schrieb Mark Terribile: > > > > > > Olli Hauer, > > > > > > I tried to reply to you directly as oha...

Re: xfce 4.8pre3 preview

2011-02-01 Thread RW
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:27:03 +0100 Gour wrote: > Despite of seeing that Xfce (aka Thunar auto-mount) is not 100% > functional as on Linux, I am still happy seeing it's alive on FreeBSD > and looking forward to put it on several desktops of current Ubuntu Which bits of Xfce aren't working? Thu

Re: Dovecot Sieve

2011-02-21 Thread RW
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:42:20 +0100 Niclas Zeising wrote: > As far as I can tell, dovecot-managesieve is the server part of sieve. > You can have it running to be able to use a sieve client to define > your sieve programs, instead of having to log on to the mail server > and edit a script file on

Re: KDE3?

2011-03-03 Thread RW
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 07:14:57 +0800 Martin Wilke wrote: > "latest" when FreeBSD 9.X release comes we have to kick because > it looks very bad with > clang support, unless someone sit down for a long time and fix all > build errrors, but i believe > he give it also up. Maybe I'm missing something

Re: nVidia BLOB driver

2011-04-19 Thread RW
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:44:11 +0200 "O. Hartmann" wrote: > And the last question is about the place where the nVidia binary > driver is kept. I tried to look for it intuitively at folder > x11-driver. Is there a reason why this BLOB is kept outside the > x11-driver ports/x11-drivers/ was created

Re: Open PR

2011-05-09 Thread RW
On Sun, 8 May 2011 12:30:46 -0400 Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 09:24:49 -0400, Jerry wrote: > > > I just noticed that there appears to be an old PR, > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/132515 that is still > > open. Has a resolution to this PR ever been resolved? >

Re: vim & python as scripting language

2011-05-28 Thread RW
On Sat, 28 May 2011 13:00:41 +0200 Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote: > On Sat, 28 May 2011 11:23:32 +0100 > Florent Thoumie wrote: > > > You can rebuild the port with WITH_PYTHON=yes. > > Thank you. > > How is it that there is no 'make config' menu to choose options from? IIRC the maintainer object

Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated?

2011-07-26 Thread RW
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:13:20 -0700 Chip Camden wrote: > Quoth Torfinn Ingolfsen on Tuesday, 26 July 2011: > > > > From what i hear, people are happy with the > > > management of ports in OpenBSD, while most of people i hear are > > > very unhappy with FreeBSD ports. > > > > I would say that "mos

Re: "make readmes" no longer builds individual ports' README.html files?

2011-08-09 Thread RW
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 22:35:35 -0500 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > Having been away from FreeBSD for a while, I'm still catching up with > all the changes that took place while I was on hiatus, so bear with me > here. :-) > > Trying to construct the ports' README.html files with: > > cd /usr/ports >

Stunnel not working

2007-11-08 Thread RW
Stunnel doesn't seem to be working correctly on my 6.2 desktop, I'm getting the following in /var/log/messages, and I have no stunnel process stunnel: LOG5[926:134660096]: stunnel 4.21 on i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 with OpenSSL 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oct 2004 stunnel: LOG5[926:134660096]: Threading:PTHREAD

Re: Stunnel not working

2007-11-08 Thread RW
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:59:15 +0100 Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On my machines, I noticed 4.21 no longer understands domain names in > connect statement of configuration file. > > Try replacing that secure.new.easynews.com by it's IP. Thanks, but it didn't work. _

Re: Stunnel not working

2007-11-12 Thread RW
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:02:59 +0200 Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:59:15PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > RW p??e v ?t 08. 11. 2007 v 22:06 +: > > > > > Stunnel doesn't seem to be working correctly on my 6.2 desktop,

Re: ports modifying system setups

2007-11-21 Thread RW
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800 Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... I have for some time wanted to add support > to rc.subr for a /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d so that ports could install > sensible defaults for rc.conf, What's the advantage of doing that over h

Re: ports modifying system setups

2007-11-22 Thread RW
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:48:59 -0800 Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RW wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800 > > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> ... I have for some time wanted to add > >>

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

2007-11-24 Thread RW
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:00:59 -0800 Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file > with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? I think > that would greatly increase the utility of the tarball, since you > could start from there

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

2007-11-24 Thread RW
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:13:06 + RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My feeling is that it's not worth the effort, because most people that > use the tarball only do so because of networking problems, I think I slightly misunderstood that you're talking about the ports tr

Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release

2007-11-26 Thread RW
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:06:48 -0800 Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RW wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:00:59 -0800 > > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file > >> with the tarb

Re: WITH_/WITHOUT_ variables confusing

2007-11-26 Thread RW
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:37:33 -0800 Clint Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to build net/vnc, and I want a server. The OPTIONS list > shows: > > OPTIONS = server "blah blah" on > > So, this tells me that by default it should be on, correct? > Yet the port throughout the makefile re

  1   2   3   4   >