Re: svn commit: r215309 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386 sys vm

From: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com Subject: Re: svn commit: r215309 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386 sys vm Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:37:49 +0200 On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:20:37AM +0300, Anonymous wrote: Konstantin Belousov k...@freebsd.org writes: Author: kib Date: Sun

Re: Uggg!

Best solution is to back up /var/db/pkg if it is in danger of deletion by a wanton admin :) The ONLY data corruption that I saw when my laptop died was *ALL* of the +CONTENTS files going away. It seems to have died during the updating of the meta-data for the dvdauthor port. Why all the files

Re: ports/INDEX building broken on 11.0-CURRENT

On May 13, 2014, at 5:04 PM, Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org wrote: On 13 May, To: po...@freebsd.org wrote: Please excuse the crosspost. I'm not sure if this is a ports problem or a CURRENT problem. I just updated my 11.0-CURRENT machine to r265940 and can no longer build ports/INDEX-11.

Re: [Patch] Using MACHINE_ARCH identifiers in pkg

Hey Baptiste, Any word on this? Warner On Jun 19, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote: On 05/28/14 10:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:54:03AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: The following was in a deep and increasingly branched thread

Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule

On Aug 21, 2012, at 1:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote: On 8/21/2012 12:42 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 8/21/2012 12:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: 1/ if it fits the schedule: get rid of pkg_* tools in current to be able to have a

Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule

On Aug 21, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote: I don't think we have ever done a complete replacement of major infrastructure in one release. You mean like sysinstall can be used as an installer on 9 that would do something meaningful with the

Re: RFT: Please help testing the llvm/clang 3.5.0 import

On Dec 18, 2014, at 6:34 AM, owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org wrote: Dimitry Andric writes: - Could a MK_CLANG_ALL_TARGETS or something similar option be added to src.opts.mk to fine tune this process for those of us who don't want to build a cross-compile toolchain every iteration for

Re: RFT: Please help testing the llvm/clang 3.5.0 import

On Dec 18, 2014, at 6:02 AM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 18 Dec 2014, at 02:17, NGie Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: ... As a request to speed up the build process further, - Would it be

Re: RFT: Please help testing the llvm/clang 3.5.0 import

This is excellent news Dimitry! On Dec 16, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 28 Nov 2014, at 22:03, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: We're working on updating llvm, clang and lldb to 3.5.0 in head. This is quite a big update again, and any help with

Re: RFT: Please help testing the llvm/clang 3.5.0 import

On Dec 18, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 18 Dec 2014, at 14:34, Robert Huff wrote: Dimitry Andric writes: - Could a MK_CLANG_ALL_TARGETS or something similar option be added to src.opts.mk to fine tune this process for those of us who don't want to build a

Re: RFT: Please help testing the llvm/clang 3.5.0 import

On Dec 18, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On 18 Dec 2014, at 15:47, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote: ... * Mips will only have a chance with the upcoming clang 3.6.0, but that is way too late for this import. It will probably require external toolchain

Re: RFT: Please help testing the llvm/clang 3.5.0 import

On Dec 18, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 18, 2014, at 6:51, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote: With the recent parallelism work, the is true. It might save a couple percent off the build time. Before those changes, though, disabling all non target

Re: 11.0-CURRENT: lang/gcc, lang/gcc5, lang/gcc6-devel, lang/llvm38, etc. do not build on/for armv6 (now implicitly hard float)

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > I'm not sure that Gerald or Brooks were CC'd on a report made to the arm > list about armv6 builds of gcc and llvm being broken now because of hard > float now being implicit: > (the first report listed below has more

Re: Is there possible run a MacOS X binary

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:49:07PM -0300, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: >> >> >> Sorry for cross posting (-current and -ports) >> >> >> Is there any emulator like linuxator to run Mac OS X binaries, or >> is ther any

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:39:50 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> 4) Remove the hardcoded library path in lang/gcc* >> >> This makes it possible to work on software that includes both libraries >> and programs

Re: Xoscope nuisance console messages on Pi4 running -current

On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 12:38 AM bob prohaska wrote: > After a successful compile of audio/xoscope on a Pi4 running current a > stream of messages appeared on the console and in the security log > while xoscope was running: > > > +WARNING pid 26370 (xoscope): ioctl sign-extension ioctl

Re: Best way to have a port...

In message: 20100302120308.ga53...@elmar.spoerlein.net Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes: : On Mon, 01.03.2010 at 23:51:25 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: : ... that builds part of FreeBSD? : : Let me back up... : : I'm trying to create a port for gcc and binutils

Re: cvs commit: ports/net Makefile ports/net/bwi-firmware-kmod Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist

In message: 790a9fff0905101305l70d7809cl1ca2525729d53...@mail.gmail.com Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com writes: : On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM, q...@freebsd.org wrote: : : phase 6: make

Re: Is fetching source RPMs in linux ports really required?

In message: 20090605133321.ga18...@hades.panopticon Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru writes: : Hi! : : I have concerns with linux ports fetching source RPMs when : PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined. As I understand, that is done to comply : with GPL, however GPL does not strictly require

upgrade

Greetings. I set out on the great 7.2 upgrade, but didn't get very far: sudo portupgrade -f -o ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel portupgrade ... === Cleaning for portupgrade-devel-2.3.0_5 --- Cleaning out obsolete shared libraries FFaattaall eeoorr ''Thread is not system scope. Thread is not

My problem

I think my problem was caused by a stale ruby18. When I did a make delete-old-libs, that program would no longer run due to a missing library. Rebuilding it, and then rebuilding portupgrade-devel was the ticket. You might want to suggest in the UPDATING file that people make sure their base

libusb failed

Maybe this is old news, but libusb failed for me: (cd .libs rm -f libusb.la ln -s ../libusb.la libusb.la) if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I. -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -MT usbpp.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/usbpp.Tpo -c -o usbpp.lo usbpp.cpp; then mv

How to get a list of all kernel modules

Greetings, is there an easy way to get a list of all the ports that compile kernel modules? I'd like to add them to my kernel build. I did this once before, but I lost all information on how to do it when I lost my laptop's hard disk after the last bsdcan... Warner

Re: How to get a list of all kernel modules

In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : Greetings, : : is there an easy way to get a list of all the ports that compile : kernel modules? I'd like to add them to my kernel build. I did this : once

Re: How to get a list of all kernel modules

In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: : : M. Warner Losh wrote: : : Greetings, : : : : is there an easy way

Re: How to get a list of all kernel modules

In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:42:01AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : I'd kinda hoped there was a pseudo category that I could key off of. : pvr250 is also kinda a mess too, since I can't build it w/o a CD I

Re: How to get a list of all kernel modules

In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 02:28:19AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: : On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 01:22:57AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: : On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:15:16AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: :I want a list

Re: How to get a list of all kernel modules

In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon) writes: : On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:42:01AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : I'd kinda hoped there was a pseudo category that I could key off of. : : Kinda sounds like there should be. That would make grepping the info

Re: How to get a list of all kernel modules

In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon) writes: : On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:42:01AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : I'd kinda hoped there was a pseudo category that I could key off of. : : Kinda sounds like there should be. : : Here's my list so far

Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6

The following reply was made to PR ports/11420; it has been noted by GNATS. From: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bin/11420 [nanobsd] Build failure on RELENG_6 Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 07:47:21 -0600

Re: Gxemul FreeBSD/MIPS

In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oleksandr Tymoshenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Just to save time to somebody who's going to try it. Due to small : issue with gxemul (PCI registers values of piix controller are not : saved having been written) FreeBSD in gxemul panics after detecting :