Re: pkg 1.3.8 requested but not available?

On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:09:38 +0200, Baptiste wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:02:11AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote: Baptiste Daroussin wrote: root:/tmp # portupgrade -nr dbus --- Session started at: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:08:37 +0200 ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/dbus:

PKG not quite ready for prime time

I'm having quite a lot of trouble converting to pkg due to there being no obvious source of accurate documentation. I got this after I thought I had it solved and could install something: 11:36 Fri, 10 Oct [momcat:root]~ pkg install firefox Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... pkg:

Re: PKG not quite ready for prime time

On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:30:18 +0200, you wrote: On 2014-10-10 19:13, scratch65...@att.net wrote: I'm having quite a lot of trouble converting to pkg due to there being no obvious source of accurate documentation. I got this after I thought I had it solved and could install something:

Re: PKG not quite ready for prime time

On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:57:42 -0500, Brian Drewery wrote: find /usr/share/keys/pkg -exec sha256 {} + No such file ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: PKG not quite ready for prime time

On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:47:27 -0500, you wrote: On 10/10/2014 1:12 PM, scratch65...@att.net wrote: On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:57:42 -0500, Brian Drewery wrote: find /usr/share/keys/pkg -exec sha256 {} + No such file That's your problem. You are missing the signature fingerprints to compare

Re: PKG not quite ready for prime time

On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:49:54 -0500, you wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2014, at 13:29, Auld Besom wrote: I had it as ${ABI} to begin with, but had no luck that way either (see below). Then I changed it, unaware that that first 8 was the version, or even that there are o/s version-dependent

Gigabyte shipping *Linux-only* ARM server board

MP30-AR0. Big specs. Without stating the obvious, these machines were not designed to run anything other than Linux at the bare metal level. The other potential pain point for integrators or end users is that the only currently supported operating system is Ubuntu 14. Over time, one would hope

PKG: MariaDB 10.1 doesn't supply my.cnf.* files

Just installed the MariaDB 10.1 package under 10.3, and discovered that there are no my.cnf.* files included as was standard in the past. That seems like a regression of sorts. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: PKG: MariaDB 10.1 doesn't supply my.cnf.* files

False alarm -- they're now named my-*.cnf rather than, as I seem to remember, my.cnf.* >Just installed the MariaDB 10.1 package under 10.3, and >discovered that there are no my.cnf.* files included as was >standard in the past. That seems like a regression of sorts.

Mariadb101-server ignores datadir in my.cfg

MariaDB 10.1 server ignores the datadir directive in my.cfg, creating new databases only in /var/db/mysql. The port claims that it honors hier(7), but hier(7) specifies that /var/db is to be used for "miscellaneous automatically generated system-specific database files", which mariadb/mysql

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:43:25 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: >On 02/08/17 11:56, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> So, what's the deal here? To "encourage" people to upgrade, pkg >> will break their existing install? That is both hostile and >> deeply arrogant! > >mat's response

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

My bug report just got closed by Mathieu Arnold because "You are using an obsolete FreeBSD version, you need to update to 10.3." So, what's the deal here? To "encourage" people to upgrade, pkg will break their existing install? That is both hostile and deeply arrogant! I don't want to upgrade

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

[Default] On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:46:09 +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote: > >> On 8 Feb 2017, at 12:29 PM, >> wrote: >> >> I just tried to install the fuse-nfts pkg under 10.2 on my >> server-of-all-work. But after requiring me to

Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

I just tried to install the fuse-nfts pkg under 10.2 on my server-of-all-work. But after requiring me to "upgrade" pkg, the fuse-ntfs install failed, apparently because there's an undefined symbol ("utimenstat") in pkg itself! How do I extricate myself?

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 13:44:10 -0800, "C Hutchinson" wrote: >> I trained as a clinical psychologist, not in computer science or >> ee. We learned that adults are notoriously resistant to change >This is a very astute observation. One I recognized as an absolute; >some

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

[Default] On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:11:06 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >Hi! Moin! > >> >> But it's the velocity that's the problem, Kurt. > >> >While I very much sympathize with "The world rotates too fast, >> >I want to get off", for me it looks like as a project we do >> >not

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

[Default] On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:30:11 +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> >> Developing the original packaging scheme would take some >> top-notch engineering. >> > >If you're talking the pkg_* tools - already have them working with

Re: MariaDB 10.1 includes sqlite3??

[Default] On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:02:13 +0100, Christian Ullrich wrote: >* scratch65...@att.net wrote: > >> Does anyone have a clue as to why sqlite3 is now being installed >> with MariaDB 10.1? The mariadb site doesn't mention it, as far > >Because you have set your ports

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:26:00 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote >Getting the ports/pkg tree moving with the velocity necessary >to cope with the fast-changing world, sometimes things break >and we all try to prevent this. Sometimes, mistakes happen... But it's the velocity that's the problem, Kurt. Do

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:09:35 -0500, Steve Wills wrote: >Hi, > >On 02/08/2017 12:34, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> >> I *did* check for bug reports. I did a search on "utimenstat" >> and found exactly one, which had been withdrawn as not being a >> bug. >> >> But it *is* a

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:46:15 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >Hi! Moin! > >> On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:26:00 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote >> >Getting the ports/pkg tree moving with the velocity necessary >> >to cope with the fast-changing world, sometimes things break >> >and we all try to

MariaDB 10.1 includes sqlite3??

Does anyone have a clue as to why sqlite3 is now being installed with MariaDB 10.1? The mariadb site doesn't mention it, as far as I can tell, and if anything qualifies as coals-to-Newcastle, this combination does. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Gimp 2.8.18,2 plugins not working under 10.3

I've installed, and then deleted and reinstalled, the package, and finally built it from ports. Nothing works. Trying to load some file to work on fails because of plugin error. This is true for xpm, jpg, tif, gif, bmp, and png files. Every plugin fails, the error message being the same,

Pkg doesn't care about conflict

I have the PHP 7.0 package installed under 10.2. Wanting to install the pecl-imagick port, I called pkg search, which returned a ref. I only caught the fact that it was going to install PHP 5.6 despite my having 7.0 installed when it started downloading 5.6. Given that PHP is one of the

Re: Checking port option descriptions

On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:11:51 -0400, Jim Ohlstein wrote: >"[S]ome" being the operative word here. I don't disagres with your basic >premise, but the truth is, at the end of the day it's up to the user to >understand the consequences of his decisions. If a user doesn't know

Re: Gimp 2.8.18,2 plugins not working under 10.3

[Default] On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:07:25 -0700 (PDT), Don Lewis wrote: > >sysctl kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 That seems to have done the trick. Thanks! I hope the maintainer fixes the problem more generally, though. ___

Re: misc/jive deleted

I've to disagree, Matthias. Technical people refusing to be part of the social world make themselves the tools of psychopaths. Then we have, as the mordant joke goes, the program nuke_germany being objected to not on humanitarian grounds, but because the program should be nuke_country with the

Re: Jive prejudices

[Default] On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:32:00 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch wrote: > >> Am 23.10.2016 um 20:00 schrieb scratch65...@att.net: >> >> For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially >> deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up >> that

Re: Jive prejudices

For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up that there's potentially something unsavory about it. On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT), Roger Marquis wrote: >Louis Epstein wrote: >> You really

Re: misc/jive deleted

[Default] On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:30:05 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: >El día Sunday, October 23, 2016 a las 02:13:12PM -0400, scratch65...@att.net >escribió: > >> I've to disagree, Matthias. Technical people refusing to be >> part of the social world make themselves the tools

Fontforge 21 June pkg has problems under 10.3

The 21 June pkg build seems to have a number of glitchy problems under 10.3. I'm afraid I don't have time to do more than mention them at present. - the flop (docs call it flip) tool doesn't seem to work at all. - the scrollbars frequently complain about having illegal values during node

Re: Checking port option descriptions

[Default] On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:13:56 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >Well, how about phpmyadmin as a for-instance? There are about eight PHP >modules which phpmyadmin will automagically adapt to the presence or >absence of at runtime and turn on or off corresponding bits of

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

[Default] On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:01:33 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: >On 12/12/2016 13:12, Janky Jay, III wrote: >> Hello scratch, >> >> On 12/11/2016 03:35 PM, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >>> I have to admit that I avoid ports if at all possible because >>> I've hardly ever

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

[Default] On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:55:57 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >Hi! > >> >> On 12/11/2016 03:35 PM, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> >>> I have to admit that I avoid ports if at all possible because >> >>> I've hardly ever been able to do a build that ran to completion. >[...] >>

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

I have to admit that I avoid ports if at all possible because I've hardly ever been able to do a build that ran to completion. There's always some piece of code that's missing and can't be found, or is the wrong version, et lengthy cetera. I've never done release engineering, but I honestly

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 17 Dec 2016, at 20:47, Alphons van Werven wrote: > But ever >> since some time during the 9.X era I started to pick up signs that the >> FreeBSD project as a whole is moving into a direction that troubles me--in >> some cases deeply indeed. I don't know what direction

A potential sine-qua-non reason...

...to spin off a project to package first a desktop/workstation and later a server. >From The Register: Water cooler Q: I read an article this week headlined: "The latest Kaby Lake, Zen chips will support only Windows 10." It claimed Intel and AMD's new processors are "officially supported only

VLC pkg fails to run under 10.3

VLC under 10.3 fails to run, complaining that /usr/local/lib/libdbus-1.so.3: version LIBDBUS_1_3 required by /usr/local/lib/libvlccore.so.8 not defined ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports

vo-aacenc is only alpha quality, and is orphaned

Yet it's used in the VLC build (which currently, for other reasons, doesn't work). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Firefox gstreamer1-plugin-lame problem

As a prelude to installing the VLC package that turned out to be broken, pkg removed Firefox 47 (it didn't explain why). Since there doesn't seem to be any way to revert the removal, I tried to install FF52 as a replacement. That failed with a complaint that the gstreamer-plugin is missing its

Re: databases/mariadb101-client upgraded in wrong order, resulted in missing files

[Default] On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:52:56 +0200, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: >scratch65...@att.net wrote on 2017/04/19 14:05: >> [Default] On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:45:54 +0200, Miroslav Lachman >> <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: >> >>> scratch65...@att.net wrote on 2017/04/19 12:45:

Re: Is pkg quarterly really needed?

[Default] On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:57:02 +0100, krad wrote: >quarterly does seem very cautious, maybe a monthly might be a good >alternative. I have to STRONGLY disagree. Right now, pkg isn't smart enough not to use version-skewed bits. Which means that, for those of us

Re: databases/mariadb101-client upgraded in wrong order, resulted in missing files

[Default] On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:45:54 +0200, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: >scratch65...@att.net wrote on 2017/04/19 12:45: >> [Default] On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:45:47 +0200, Miroslav Lachman >> <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: >> >>> Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2017/03/31 15:31: I don't

Pkg or dbus should create /etc/machine-id when not found

Not only that, but pkg should not delete things until AFTER it successfully replaces them! I finally broke down and did a pkg upgrade yesterday, which cost me the whole afternoon. I had to do it because pkg wasn't smart enough not to use the current quarter's bits to install a package on a

Re: databases/mariadb101-client upgraded in wrong order, resulted in missing files

[Default] On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:45:47 +0200, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: >Miroslav Lachman wrote on 2017/03/31 15:31: >> I don't know if it was "pkg" fault or mariadb101-server and >> mariadb101-client conflict. >> >> I did standard "pkg upgrade" and at the end I have half files

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:47:31 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: >On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:35 PM, wrote: > >> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin >> wrote: >> >> >Hi all, >> > >> >I would like to propose a change in the

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >Hi all, > >I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > >I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first >and maybe instead of in long term. > >The reason is: >-

Re: gtkmm30 fails to build under 10.3

[Default] On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:46:44 +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > writes: > >> Package dependency requirement 'giomm-2.4 >= 2.49.1' could not be >> satisfied. >> Package 'giomm-2.4' has version '2.44.0', required version is '>= >> 2.49.1' >> Package

Re: gtkmm30 fails to build under 10.3

[Default] On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 07:12:36 -0400, I wrote: >[Default] On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:45:58 +0200, Jan Beich > wrote: > >> writes: >> >>> [Default] On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:46:44 +0200, Jan Beich >>> wrote: >>>

Re: gtkmm30 fails to build under 10.3

[Default] On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 10:45:58 +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > writes: > >> [Default] On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:46:44 +0200, Jan Beich >> wrote: >> >>> writes: >>> Package dependency requirement 'giomm-2.4

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

[Default] On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 19:33:50 +, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >we could >start small with a just a handful of ports in a stable LTS (Long Term >Support) branch. Develop processes around maintaining them, get some >feedback about the effort of applying only security

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:16:01 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: >On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 04:53:36PM -0400, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> Since that's what I integrate for my dev use, I'd be happy to >> take a zero'th-order cut at defining it, if nobody else wants to. > >Fine. See

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

[Default] On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:45:34 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: >On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 09:24:31AM -0400, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> The number of ports to build a server-of-all-work is not large. > >Now the problem is getting people to agree on exactly what that

gtkmm30 fails to build under 10.3

16:07:55 Wed, 16 Aug [fastcat:root]/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtkmm30> make install ===> License LGPL21 accepted by the user ===> gtkmm30-3.22.0 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by gtkmm30-3.22.0 for building ===> Extracting for gtkmm30-3.22.0 =>

gtkmm20 also fails to build under 10.3

16:48:23 Wed, 16 Aug [fastcat:root]/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtkmm24> make clean ===> Cleaning for gtkmm24-2.24.4_3 16:48:42 Wed, 16 Aug [fastcat:root]/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtkmm24> make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes install ===> gtkmm24-2.24.4_3 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===>

Re: I went to install 11.1 yesterday

[Default] On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 12:05:29 +, Manish Jain wrote: > > >On 08/20/17 17:20, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> discovered that, like Linux (or at >> least Ubuntu) 11 doesn't support MBR > > >Hi, > >There must be some misunderstanding here. Both Linux as well

Re: I went to install 11.1 yesterday

You're right, it was half my mistake. This motherboard's bios has a switch for EFI, legacy, and both. The factory setting was both, and, after defaulting to EFI, the installer evidently didn't know how to back up and try again when it found an MBR partition. I'll report the bug. I may have

Re: I went to install 11.1 yesterday

[Default] On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:09:13 +, Manish Jain wrote: > > >On 08/20/17 19:57, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> That's quite interesting! What led me to believe it is that, >> after installing windows, which required creating and formatting >> an MBR

Samba4 needs switch to turn off messages

Whenever there is more than 1 Samba server running in the same netbios space, they INCESSANTLY put out the same worthless message every 5 minutes exactly, filling up disc space or disrupting whatever's happening on the console. The message always has the same form: "query name response:

Re: gtkmm30 fails to build under 10.3

[Default] On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:19:11 +0200 (CEST), "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: >Just try what jbeich@ told you. Or use pkg! The problem is twofold, really: it's the makefile that should satisfy the dependencies, but it doesn't; and evidently nobody ever bothered to test

pkg and packages

After doing a general pkg upgrade on my server-of-all-work, I discovered after some research that the Big Grey Background I was left with was due to pkg having deleted, but not replaced, xfce4 desktop. Trying to install the desktop package, I discovered that it's bundled with at least 2

Re: How should we name node-js ports ?

[Default] On Sun, 14 May 2017 14:16:23 +0200, Rodrigo Osorio wrote: >Hi, > >I have a bunch of nodejs ports to add, most of them as dependencies, >and I wonder if we can find a naming standard like adding 'node' or >'node-js' prefix in the name ; I personally prefer 'node'. > >As

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

[Default] On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 17:30:10 +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: >I regularly seeing admins setting up different Ubuntu versions, because >at one you have PHP 7 and on the other MySQL 5.7, but not both at the >same Ubuntu version. Which is one of the nice things

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

[Default] On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:01:45 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: >I've had this conversation with ports several times, But the requirements >of 'business' is not their interest. In fact i was told several times, >"Don't use our quarterly packages, make your own with

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

[Default] On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:16:44 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >The model with one branch per release will bring it to way more with a >maintenance window way larger It would indeed! Factor of 3, I think. But I'm really not suggesting that, I'm suggesting that a

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

[Default] On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:11:26 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: >On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:32:45PM -0400, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> My problem is that my industry experience tells me that reducing >> the frequency of port releases is practically *guaranteed* to be

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:36:19 +0200, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: >scratch65...@att.net wrote on 2017/06/23 00:15: >> [Default] On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:11:26 -0500, Mark Linimon >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:32:45PM -0400, scratch65...@att.net

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

[Default] On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:38:53 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >On 2017/06/22 15:03, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> Why don't the same choices apply here? What am I missing? > >Two things: > > 1) It's progress in the development of the FreeBSD base system that >drives

Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version

[Default] On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:18:56 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >As usual with such proposal, where do you find the manpower to handle the >number >of branches required (the quarterly branches are already hard to maintain, it >is >only one branch). Please help me out

Re: Upgrade PHP to 7.0

[Default] On Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:10:46 -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: >Are there any instructions explaining how to upgrade php from 5.6.30 to >7.0? Is it fairly straightforward? Or are there some gotchas one needs to >know about? php.net has some info, but if you're not

Re: pkg and packages

[Default] On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:11:00 +0200, Sebastian Schwarz wrote: >On 2017-05-04, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >> I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and >> samba that the xfce desktop would need, (...) > >Thunar is used to display the icons on the XFCE

Re: pkg and packages

[Default] On Thu, 4 May 2017 14:18:46 +0100, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: >AFAIK samba isn't a dependency of XFCE. I don't have it and it's not in >the output of make all-depends-list. Thanks, you beat me to it. I thought such a dependency would be pretty

Re: pkg and packages

On Wed, 3 May 2017 16:53:41 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> Trying to install the desktop package, I discovered that it's >>> bundled with at least 2 unrelated pieces of software: Thunar, >>> and samba44. That bothered me, but I needed the desktop. >

Re: FireFox memory usage

I've been seeing -- and have reported, to no avail -- the same behavior under XP at least since v43. FF gradually consumes all available memory and crashes. Killing the job before the crash and restarting has the same effect you cite: memory use goes back to a reasonable number before again

gtkmm30 package install failed: size mismatch

17:22:34 Sun, 27 Aug [momcat:root]~> pkg install gtkmm30 Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. The following 7 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: gtkmm30: 3.22.0 pangomm:

Re: GVFS build fail

I don't know whose idea it was to include GVFS, but it's glued onto everything and the constant warnings about how this or that part doesn't work are getting right up my nostril. Perhaps whoever decided to include it is a hobbyist who, if asked, would say "well yeah, it doesn't work, but I

Re: gtkmm30 package install failed: size mismatch

[Default] On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:08:05 +0200, Jan Beich wrote: >Try running: pkg update -f Are you thinking of something else, perhaps? The man page doesn't show an -f switch, and pkg thinks the repositories were already current, which is why (I suppose) it tried a remote

Re: gtkmm30 package install failed: size mismatch

Thanks, Manish. Very non-standard syntax, that. So evidently when pkg claims that the repositories are current, as it did, it may be, in effect, lying. Which suggests that *it* should be doing the forced update as step 3 in its attempt to get good bits. [sigh] [Default] On Mon, 28 Aug

I went to install 11.1 yesterday

...as a dual-boot with W7, but discovered that, like Linux (or at least Ubuntu) 11 doesn't support MBR. So no dual-boot with older Windows. I reinstalled 10.3 instead. Will 10.4 still support MBR? What will happen to those who can't easily afford to buy a special disc for XP or 7 or some other

Re: standard locations for port files

[Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:53:27 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote: >On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, wrote: > >> Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all >> other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there >> in

Re: standard locations for port files

Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there in making logs an exception? [Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:16:20 -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> On 31 Aug, 2017, at 9:07, Ernie Luzar

Re: Wacom tablet

I have the same problem with my kvm when switching ports, though with the base system rather than xorg (I use xfce as the window layer, and it doesn't scold me for "unplugging" the device). I've been looking at the source when I've had time, but haven't quite tracked down the code that wants

Re: Confirm: About freebsd Registration

I've forwarded this to the FreeBSD Foundation at i...@freebsdfoundation.org for their action. I would guess that Runbang Holdings should not be granted the freebsd.*.cn domain names, since they probably have little or no connection to the FreeBSD Foundation and its work. I might be wrong about

Re: Firefox became much slower

Yes. It's true under Windows, too. I keep having to kill the current process and reload. It's quite bad. On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:07:11 +0300, Gleb Popov <6year...@gmail.com> wrote: >I'm using Firefox on quite ancient machine (amd64, though) and after >updating from firefox-56.0.1_3 to

Re: Confirm: About freebsd Registration

Ta, Jon. Oh well, we live and, if we're lucky, we learn. It looked innocuous enough. Between their shoddy manufacturing and their duplicitous marketing, it won't surprise me if the eager Capitalist liars in the mis-named PRC eventually make "Chinese businessman" the trustworthless

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

[Default] On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:21:17 +0100, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: >what said > >grep php /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf It said the usual: LoadModule php7_modulelibexec/apache24/libphp7.so There was definitely something wrong with that lib

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

Okay, I rebuilt apache24 and php72 from ports. I'm still getting the error. Would someone who has php 7.2 working with apache 2.4 under 11.1R please post the MD5 hash of libphp7.so? Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

I upgraded to 11.1, and installed php72. But I'm getting a httpd.conf error saying that "php7_module" is an undefined symbol in the .so It was okay in 7.1 -- did it change? Php.net doesn't seem to have anything to say about it. ___

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

Thanks, Yasu & Carmel. Bizarrely, the md5 I get is different to both of yours: d739fb09ede2917b54c06eab05130e10 Nor is any of them the same as the one on my server-of-all-work, running 10.2R and php 7.0 with apache 2.4: 10f8f74874296c48c9e099c67ca26be9 nor is the one I get when I replace the

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

Did 11.1 break something in PHP? I just reverted to PHP 7.1, but the problem with the .so remains. Who builds libphp7.so? It seems to be a bit of a mess. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

[Default] On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:54:33 +0100, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > > >Am 15.02.2018 um 17:35 schrieb scratch65...@att.net: >> I upgraded to 11.1, and installed php72. But I'm getting a >> httpd.conf error saying that "php7_module" is an undefined symbol >> in the .so

Re: 11.1R, PHP7.2.3: mysqli not loading. What am I missing?

[Default] On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:04:01 -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: >Do you have WITH_MPM in your make.conf? No, I've so far not felt the need to set up a make.conf. I generally just use packages or build the vanilla version since make config only ever seems to allow

11.1R, PHP7.2.3: mysqli not loading. What am I missing?

from pkg info -x php72: === mod_php72-7.2.3 php72-7.2.3 php72-ctype-7.2.3 php72-dom-7.2.3 php72-extensions-1.0 php72-filter-7.2.3 php72-gd-7.2.3 php72-hash-7.2.3 php72-iconv-7.2.3 php72-json-7.2.3 php72-mbstring-7.2.3 php72-mysqli-7.2.3 php72-opcache-7.2.3 php72-openssl-7.2.3

Re: 11.1R, PHP7.2.3: mysqli not loading. What am I missing?

What's happening is that, although I built both apache24 and php72 without any optional flavoring, apache is looking in the thread-safe subtree (-zts) for php modules when it shouldn't be, since it's loading the prefork module,. I've looked, but can't see a switch to turn that off. And php

Re: Changing PHP default version from 5.6 to 7.2 timeframe?

[Default] On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:48:40 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >Hi! > >> It appears that there is some work going on to prepare to switch >> the default PHP version from 5.6 to an actively supported version. > >Yes. > >> What is the approximate timeframe for that change, if