Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
>> On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 12:12:44 -0400
>> Joseph Mingrone said:
>> - japanese/egg-canna/Makefile (does not build with emacs versions >= 23)
>> - japanese/migemo-emacs23
> jrm> Are you Ok if I remove these ports immediately, since Emacs version 23
> was removed fro
Joseph Mingrone wrote
in <86d135nne8@phe.ftfl.ca>:
jr> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
jr> Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel they should
jr> be removed?
jr> - editors/psgml (use psgml-1.3.4.tar from
http://elpa.gnu.org/pack
Liu Dryice writes:
> On 24 Dec 2017, 05:29 +0800, Joseph Mingrone , wrote:
> - deskutils/etask (non-mirrored tarball dead since 2007)
> This is still fetchable from distcache. Though I admit I haven't used
> it and haven't heard about it for quite a long time.
I see reports that patches were r
Hi,
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 12:12:44 -0400
> Joseph Mingrone said:
> - japanese/egg-canna/Makefile (does not build with emacs versions >= 23)
> - japanese/migemo-emacs23
jrm> Are you Ok if I remove these ports immediately, since Emacs version 23 was
removed from the
jrm> ports tree in 20
Joseph Mingrone writes:
> - japanese/egg-canna/Makefile (does not build with emacs versions >= 23)
> - japanese/migemo-emacs23
Are you Ok if I remove these ports immediately, since Emacs version 23 was
removed from the
ports tree in 2014.
Joseph
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
From: Joseph Mingrone
Subject: Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 18:29:29 -0400
>>> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
>>> Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel they should
>&g
Yasuhiro KIMURA writes:
> From: Joseph Mingrone
> Subject: Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 18:29:29 -0400
>>>> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
>>>> Could you speak up if they are still
Hi,
I resend this message because it was rejected by ports list.
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
> Joseph Mingrone said:
jrm> - mail/xcite (no real updates since 2010, still useful?)
I'm using it. It is very useful at least for me.
I don't think no update means no usefulness. :-(
Hi,
I resend this message because it was rejected by ports list.
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
> Joseph Mingrone said:
jrm> - mail/x-face-e21 (not fetchable)
It seems fetchable.
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO
u...@mahoroba.org u...@freebsd.org
http://www.mahoroba.org/~ume/
___
From: Joseph Mingrone
Subject: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
> Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel they should
> be removed?
(snip)
> - editors/apel (2010
[resending because original did not make it to the list]
Joseph Mingrone writes:
> Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
>> Hi,
>>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
>>> Joseph Mingrone said:
>> jrm> - mail/xcite (no real updates since 2010, still useful?)
>> I'm using it. It is very useful at l
[resending because original message did not make it to the list]
Joseph Mingrone writes:
> Yasuhiro KIMURA writes:
>> From: Joseph Mingrone
>> Subject: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
>> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
>>> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their
Yasuhiro KIMURA writes:
> From: Joseph Mingrone
> Subject: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
>> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
>> Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel they should
>> be remov
From: Joseph Mingrone
Subject: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
> Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel they should
> be removed?
(snip)
> - japanese/lookup (sou
14 matches
Mail list logo
