Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote on 2019/10/24 02:54:
Dear Committers,
Would someone please commit following bug report?
security/vuxml: Document potential bypass of Runas user restrictions in sudo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241244
If somebody will touch vuxml, please commit this
From: Koichiro Iwao
Subject: Re: Bug report commit request
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 16:14:53 +0900
> Regarding the PR, koobs@ has already taken it. I leave it to him.
> I'm also a big user of certbot, I can also understand your change
> and commit it.
No. He set keyword and chan
Regarding the PR, koobs@ has already taken it. I leave it to him.
I'm also a big user of certbot, I can also understand your change
and commit it.
If you add me to CC list when you submit a PR, I'll look at
yours AMAP. Particularly japanese/* ports and popular ports
in Japan.
Thanks always for yo
Hi!!
> > There is no other LICENSE=NONE instance in the ports tree.
>
> yasu@eastasia[2770]% find -s . -name Makefile -exec grep 'LICENSE.*NONE' {} +
> /usr0/freebsd/ports/head.test
> ./audio/playgsf/Makefile:LICENSE= GPLv2+ LGPL21 NONE
[...]
You are right, I searched the
From: Kurt Jaeger
Subject: Re: Bug report commit request
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:21:58 +0100
> There is no other LICENSE=NONE instance in the ports tree.
yasu@eastasia[2769]% LANG=C svn info
/usr0/freebsd/ports/head.test
P
Hi!
> >> > What about the LICENSE=NONE setting ? It stops the port from being build
> >> > in poudriere ?
> > So, does it sound sensible to define a LICENSE that one has to special-case
> > immediatly just to do a test-build ? I mean, don't we all have better things
> > to do than shooting ourse
From: Kurt Jaeger
Subject: Re: Bug report commit request
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:44:49 +0100
>> > What about the LICENSE=NONE setting ? It stops the port from being build
>> > in poudriere ?
>> > Can the LICENSE line be just removed ?
>> You can build t
Hi!
> > What about the LICENSE=NONE setting ? It stops the port from being build in
> > poudriere ?
> >
> > Can the LICENSE line be just removed ?
>
> You can build this port with poudriere by adding
> 'LICENSES_ACCEPTED=NONE' in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf.
So, does it sound sensible
From: Kurt Jaeger
Subject: Re: Bug report commit request
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:10:32 +0100
> What about the LICENSE=NONE setting ? It stops the port from being build in
> poudriere ?
>
> Can the LICENSE line be just removed ?
You can build this port with poudrie
Hi!
> Would someone please commit following bug report with maintainer
> timeout?
>
> Bug 234137 - security/bruteforceblocker: Update patterns to make them
> match with log messages from recent version of OpenSSH
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234137
What about the LICENSE=N
I'll take this one.
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 11:13:12AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> Dear Committers,
>
> Would someone please commit following bug report?
>
> [NEW PORT] mail/s-nail: Send and receive Internet mail
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232189
>
> Best Regards.
>
2018年7月30日 03:44, "Kurt Jaeger" wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Bug 228861 - mail/mew: Update to 6.8 and etc
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228861
>>
>> Testbuilds@work
>
> Committed, thanks!
Thank you for committing them.
---
Yasuhiro Kimura
_
Hi!
> > Bug 228861 - mail/mew: Update to 6.8 and etc
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228861
>
> Testbuilds@work
Committed, thanks!
--
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372 2 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebs
Hi1
> Bug 228861 - mail/mew: Update to 6.8 and etc
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228861
Testbuilds@work
> Bug 229077 - textproc/multimarkdown: Switch to 'USES=localbase:ldflags'
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229077
Done.
--
p...@freebsd.org
Hello Walter,
From: Walter Schwarzenfeld
Subject: Re: Bug report commit request
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 23:23:49 +0200
> If you can provide a side with an english description I can try to
> update it. I only found japanese descriptions.
Following is rough translation of README included in
> Especially there seems to be large change of > build conditions of
games/ninix-aya from 4.4 to 5.0.5. So I only
> fixed fetching problem of these ports.
If you can provide a side with an english description I can try to
update it. I only found japanese descriptions.
Otherwise, I think we
Hi!
> >> Bug 228241 - games/ninix-aya: Change MASTER_SITES to DEBIAN_POOL
> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228241
> >
> > The official dist-site is SF, and there's a version 5.0.5 available.
> >
> > Any reason why updating from 4.4 to 5.0.5 is not feasable ?
> 5. I myself
From: Kurt Jaeger
Subject: Re: Bug report commit request
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 18:15:04 +0200
>> Bug 228241 - games/ninix-aya: Change MASTER_SITES to DEBIAN_POOL
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228241
>
> The official dist-site is SF, and there's a
Hi!
> Bug 228241 - games/ninix-aya: Change MASTER_SITES to DEBIAN_POOL
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228241
The official dist-site is SF, and there's a version 5.0.5 available.
Any reason why updating from 4.4 to 5.0.5 is not feasable ?
> Bug 228242 - japanese/font-ume: Fi
From: Kurt Jaeger
Subject: Re: Bug report commit request
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 13:34:21 +0200
>> Would someone please commit following bug report with maintainer
>> timeout?
>> Bug 227497 - devel/dash.el: Update to 2.14.1
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_
Hi!
> Would someone please commit following bug report with maintainer
> timeout?
>
> Bug 227497 - devel/dash.el: Update to 2.14.1
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227497
Done.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go !
___
Hi!
> Would someone please commit following bug report with maintainer
> timeout?
>
> Bug 227497 - devel/dash.el: Update to 2.14.1
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227497
Testbuilding will take a while. Ideas to speed up the commits:
- note if you did testbuilds (if with poud
From: Kurt Jaeger
Subject: Re: Bug report commit request
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2018 18:54:42 +0200
> This probably needs an exp-run, see:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227091
I understand. Thank you for reply.
---
Yasuhi
Hi!
> Would someone please commit following bug reports?
>
> Bug 227055 - lang/ruby24: Update to 2.4.4
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227055
>
> It fixes multiple vulnerabilities of Ruby. lang/ruby23 and lang/ruby25
> were quickly updated but only lang/ruby24 wasn't. So it s
From: Kurt Jaeger
Subject: Re: Bug report commit request
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 18:26:20 +0100
>> Trying again. Would someone please commit them?
>
> Done, sorry for the delay.
Thank you for committing.
> Please note: Do not attach build logs to the PRs -- it
> fills up the
Hi!
> Trying again. Would someone please commit them?
Done, sorry for the delay.
Please note: Do not attach build logs to the PRs -- it
fills up the bugzilla database and it's sufficient to note
that it was tested in poudriere (and maybe, which releases).
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31
Trying again. Would someone please commit them?
From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
Subject: Bug report commit request
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:55:54 +0900 (JST)
> Dear committers,
>
> Would someone please commit following bug reports?
>
> Bug 224507 - New port: devel/liblockfile standard lockfile library
27 matches
Mail list logo