Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-17 Thread Daniel Roethlisberger
Michel Talon ta...@lpthe.jussieu.fr 2009-01-08:
 would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent
 in FreeBSD? [...]

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=130658
New port: mail/dma - The DragonFly Mail Agent.

Includes an optional quick hack (ruby wrapper) to add -t sendmail
option support, needed to make send-pr(1) happy with dma.

 For simplicity i have a tarball here:
 http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/dma.tgz

Note that this dma.tgz is behind the latest DragonFly sources.

-- 
Daniel Roethlisberger
http://daniel.roe.ch/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-09 Thread Gonzalo Nemmi
On Thursday 08 January 2009 12:08:55 pm Michel Talon wrote:
 Hello,

 would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent in
 FreeBSD? It is a very simple mail agent, like ssmtp, but with some more
 features: it can either deliver mail locally for local users or send all
 other mail to a smarthost, and reads the aliases file. Hence it fulfills
 the needs of the person who wants a small mail agent for receiving
 periodic root mail, and wants to send the occasional without too much
 fuss. It is much simpler than sendmail, postfix or exim.

 For simplicity i have a tarball here:
 http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/dma.tgz
 it compiles out of the box, and it is easy to figure out how to use it.

I second that .. Sendmail has turned into an unnecesary behemont for a local 
MTA .. dma is a lot smaller, simpler, easier to maintain, a lot less bug 
prone, way easier to configure and all in all, just what I need if my MTA 
only job will be delivering local mail ... Sendmail feels like having a 
HUMMER only to take my kids to school and then get back to my home .. which 
is only two blocks away ... :s

It would be really nice if I could choose whether I want Sendmail, Postfix or 
dma upon installation time (sysinstall) ...

Regards
-- 
Blessings
Gonzalo Nemmi
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-09 Thread Alex Keda

Gonzalo Nemmi пишет:

On Thursday 08 January 2009 12:08:55 pm Michel Talon wrote:

Hello,

would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent in
FreeBSD? It is a very simple mail agent, like ssmtp, but with some more
features: it can either deliver mail locally for local users or send all
other mail to a smarthost, and reads the aliases file. Hence it fulfills
the needs of the person who wants a small mail agent for receiving
periodic root mail, and wants to send the occasional without too much
fuss. It is much simpler than sendmail, postfix or exim.

For simplicity i have a tarball here:
http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/dma.tgz
it compiles out of the box, and it is easy to figure out how to use it.


I second that .. Sendmail has turned into an unnecesary behemont for a local 
MTA .. dma is a lot smaller, simpler, easier to maintain, a lot less bug 
prone, way easier to configure and all in all, just what I need if my MTA 
only job will be delivering local mail ... Sendmail feels like having a 
HUMMER only to take my kids to school and then get back to my home .. which 
is only two blocks away ... :s


It would be really nice if I could choose whether I want Sendmail, Postfix or 
dma upon installation time (sysinstall) ...

Or exim =)

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-08 Thread Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi, Michel.

By default, FreeBSD's Sendmail that comes in base already delivers mail
to local users and reads the aliases file also. It supports configuring
a smarthost as well. Unless there are some highly desired features in
the DragonFlyBSD mail agent, I seriously doubt there will be any
migration to it from Sendmail in the near future.

Regards,
Janky Jay, III

Michel Talon wrote:
 Hello,
 
 would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent in
 FreeBSD? It is a very simple mail agent, like ssmtp, but with some more
 features: it can either deliver mail locally for local users or send all
 other mail to a smarthost, and reads the aliases file. Hence it fulfills
 the needs of the person who wants a small mail agent for receiving
 periodic root mail, and wants to send the occasional without too much
 fuss. It is much simpler than sendmail, postfix or exim.
 
 For simplicity i have a tarball here:
 http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/dma.tgz
 it compiles out of the box, and it is easy to figure out how to use it.
 
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJZh5pGK3MsUbJZn4RAhHMAJ4j6lQ3gDkye5ciegdf2Zc5iSPSFACfeLhm
qXqX5PutiNLFKzKklcvyE+M=
=N9jA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-08 Thread Michel Talon
Janky Jay, III wrote:

 By default, FreeBSD's Sendmail that comes in base already delivers mail
 to local users and reads the aliases file also. It supports configuring
 a smarthost as well. Unless there are some highly desired features in
 the DragonFlyBSD mail agent, I seriously doubt there will be any
 migration to it from Sendmail in the near future.

I was not speaking of replacing sendmail in the base system, only on
offering this mail agent in the *ports*, this is why i posted in
freebsd-ports. I should have been clearer.

This mail agent doesn't offer anything compelling compared to sendmail,
only it is much smaller and presumably more secure. For example if you
want a mail agent in a jail, you can envision to use this one instead of 
sendmail because it is much lighter. Yes i know ssmtpd could do the
same, more or less but this one has a little more flexibility without
falling in the complexity of the big ones.


-- 

Michel TALON

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-08 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:48:10PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
 This mail agent doesn't offer anything compelling compared to sendmail,
 only it is much smaller and presumably more secure.

I have previously seen it advocated for base as an alternative for
systems that e.g. only need to send cronmail.

mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-08 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:48:10PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
 Janky Jay, III wrote:
 
  By default, FreeBSD's Sendmail that comes in base already delivers mail
  to local users and reads the aliases file also. It supports configuring
  a smarthost as well. Unless there are some highly desired features in
  the DragonFlyBSD mail agent, I seriously doubt there will be any
  migration to it from Sendmail in the near future.
 
 I was not speaking of replacing sendmail in the base system, only on
 offering this mail agent in the *ports*, this is why i posted in
 freebsd-ports. I should have been clearer.
 
 This mail agent doesn't offer anything compelling compared to sendmail,
 only it is much smaller and presumably more secure. For example if you
 want a mail agent in a jail, you can envision to use this one instead of 
 sendmail because it is much lighter. Yes i know ssmtpd could do the
 same, more or less but this one has a little more flexibility without
 falling in the complexity of the big ones.

I see no reason for it not to be in ports.  If it's useful like you
described above then I'm sure other people will make use of it and be
glad it is maintained in the ports tree.  If you're willing to maintain
it please submit a PR with your work.

-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-08 Thread Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi, Michel.

Ah! Okay. This makes much more sense... Its not a problem at all to
port the mail agent to FreeBSD. Just create a port, test and submit it
and voila! Sorry for the misunderstanding earlier...

Regards,
Janky Jay, III

Michel Talon wrote:
 Janky Jay, III wrote:
 
 By default, FreeBSD's Sendmail that comes in base already delivers mail
 to local users and reads the aliases file also. It supports configuring
 a smarthost as well. Unless there are some highly desired features in
 the DragonFlyBSD mail agent, I seriously doubt there will be any
 migration to it from Sendmail in the near future.
 
 I was not speaking of replacing sendmail in the base system, only on
 offering this mail agent in the *ports*, this is why i posted in
 freebsd-ports. I should have been clearer.
 
 This mail agent doesn't offer anything compelling compared to sendmail,
 only it is much smaller and presumably more secure. For example if you
 want a mail agent in a jail, you can envision to use this one instead of 
 sendmail because it is much lighter. Yes i know ssmtpd could do the
 same, more or less but this one has a little more flexibility without
 falling in the complexity of the big ones.
 
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJZlFIGK3MsUbJZn4RAgOSAJ0VOtSEKaZHXlKaeQIUoI5PuR64KACfTOcx
N3WqR0rQ6S7pjolzWEuKhy4=
=doPU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-08 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
 I see no reason for it not to be in ports.  If it's useful like you
 described above then I'm sure other people will make use of it and be
 glad it is maintained in the ports tree.  If you're willing to maintain
 it please submit a PR with your work.

Sweet, is anyone with commit access  willing to commit it to the ports tree?

Sam Fourman Jr.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-08 Thread Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi, Sam.

Of course. Once the port is submitted via a PR, it will be looked over
and committed. Check out the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/ for more
information about how to create and submit a port.

Regards,
Janky Jay, III

Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
 I see no reason for it not to be in ports.  If it's useful like you
 described above then I'm sure other people will make use of it and be
 glad it is maintained in the ports tree.  If you're willing to maintain
 it please submit a PR with your work.
 
 Sweet, is anyone with commit access  willing to commit it to the ports tree?
 
 Sam Fourman Jr.
 ___
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJZmOVGK3MsUbJZn4RAsJ/AJ9HMdsYxlrQoeUmJwHSqiH9viwr3gCfYcLO
D+p/0l8w2RHStvu2yLYRrZU=
=19dY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-08 Thread Michel Talon
Le jeudi 08 janvier 2009, vous avez écrit :
 On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:48:10PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
  This mail agent doesn't offer anything compelling compared to sendmail,
  only it is much smaller and presumably more secure.

 I have previously seen it advocated for base as an alternative for
 systems that e.g. only need to send cronmail.

 mcl

I am using DragonFly mail agent on some jails since a few months and it works 
OK. Hence dma.tgz compiles out of the box and works as advertised on FreeBSD.

I can give some information on the configuration: this shows the simplicity of
the configuration file.

jail1% cat /etc/dma/dma.conf

# $DragonFly: src/etc/dma/dma.conf,v 1.2 2008-02-04 10:11:41 matthias Exp $
#
# Your smarthost (also called relayhost).  Leave blank if you don't want
# smarthost support.  Here i take the base host as smarthost
SMARTHOST niobe

# Use this SMTP port.  Most users will be fine with the default (25)
PORT 25

# Path to your alias file.  Note it reads aliases, not aliases.db. Same file  
# as sendmail aliases.
ALIASES /etc/mail/aliases

# Path to your spooldir.  Just stay with the default.
SPOOLDIR /var/spool/dma

# Path to your virtual user file.  Just stay with the default.
VIRTPATH /etc/dma/virtusertable

To deliver local mail it seems that dma needs to be suid root:
jail1% ls -l /usr/libexec/sendmail/dma
-r-sr-sr-x  1 root  mail  42904 Aug 20 00:45 /usr/libexec/sendmail/dma

The spool directory is
drwxrwxr-x  2 root   mail2 Jan  8 03:05 dma





___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: DragonFlyBSD mail agent

2009-01-08 Thread Aragon Gouveia
| By Michel Talon ta...@lpthe.jussieu.fr
|  [ 2009-01-08 16:09 +0200 ]
 would it not be interesting to have the DragonFlyBSD mail agent in
 FreeBSD?

I use ssmtp on many systems and would love to try dma.  Looking forward to
seeing it in ports!  Thanks!


Regards,
Aragon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org