Re: State of FUSE on FreeBSD

> On 03 Aug 2017, at 22:22, Julian Elischer wrote: > > On 3/8/17 7:38 pm, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am the upstream maintainer of libfuse. I'd like to refresh / improve >> the FreeBSD support in libfuse. My goal is for libfuse not to require >> any FreeBSD

Re: State of FUSE on FreeBSD

On Aug 04 2017, Julian Elischer wrote: >> Personally, I don't use FreeBSD and I don't have an easy way to test on >> FreeBSD either. So I would appreciate any input. > > got vmware or Xen or virtualBox or HyperV? > > we provide a bunch of virtual images. Certainly. But it's

Re: State of FUSE on FreeBSD

On Aug 05 2017, Patrick Powell wrote: > A grateful note of thanks for this effort, especially to Nikolaus > Rath and the FreeBSD maintainers! Well, as I said in my other mail, it would be great if someone could give the git master branch a try on FreeBSD Best,

Re: State of FUSE on FreeBSD

A grateful note of thanks for this effort, especially to Nikolaus Rath and the FreeBSD maintainers! On 08/03/17 13:22, Julian Elischer wrote: On 3/8/17 7:38 pm, Nikolaus Rath wrote: Hello, I am the upstream maintainer of libfuse. I'd like to refresh / improve the FreeBSD support in libfuse.

Re: State of FUSE on FreeBSD

On 3/8/17 7:38 pm, Nikolaus Rath wrote: Hello, I am the upstream maintainer of libfuse. I'd like to refresh / improve the FreeBSD support in libfuse. My goal is for libfuse not to require any FreeBSD specific patches. Hi, great to hear from you! at $JOB we use libfuse and We have always

Re: State of FUSE on FreeBSD

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:38:28PM +0200, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Hello, > > I am the upstream maintainer of libfuse. I'd like to refresh / improve > the FreeBSD support in libfuse. My goal is for libfuse not to require > any FreeBSD specific patches. > > After taking a look at >