Colin, adding you to this thread with proposed patch (two options) for
freebsd-update, below.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Honest question, have you been building things from source under
debian's ports or are you using their version of pkg?
the latter
Royce Williams ro...@tycho.org wrote:
Colin, adding you to this thread with proposed patch (two options) for
freebsd-update, below.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Honest question, have you been building things from source under
debian's ports or are
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 03:29:23PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
Royce Williams ro...@tycho.org wrote:
Colin, adding you to this thread with proposed patch (two options) for
freebsd-update, below.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Honest question,
Use freebsd-update fetch install to update staying in the currently
running RELEASE branch. So you just get security updates and errata.
ty!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Am 23.03.2014 01:18, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
PACKAGESITE support in pkg.conf has been dropped entirely in 1.3 which
is in alpha at the moment. I need to double check, but that should mean
those error messages will go away too.
To be blunt, anyone who wants to use FreeBSD for production does
On 3/22/2014 15:29, Esa Karkkainen wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:49:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
and i have two 9 systems where i try to use freebsd-update. also a
time-consuming rabbit hole leading nowhere pleasant. e.g.
# freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE-p3
Lose the -p3,
from another team member, also a long time freebsd user of decades
firefox build bombs because something has hardwired gcc47, which is
not installed, so firefox's ./configure bombs testing hello world.
Attempting to figure out what has hardwired gcc47 quickly leads down
an entire
On 3/22/14 11:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
from another team member, also a long time freebsd user of decades
firefox build bombs because something has hardwired gcc47, which is
not installed, so firefox's ./configure bombs testing hello world.
Attempting to figure out what has
What about using pkg(1) and what version of FreeBSD are you on?
what about standing on my left foot and chewing gum? you're down in the
kinky world where the customer has to spend serious time and energy to
get around brokenness in your product. this is a well-known recipe for
losing
On 3/22/14 11:19 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
What about using pkg(1) and what version of FreeBSD are you on?
what about standing on my left foot and chewing gum? you're down in the
kinky world where the customer has to spend serious time and energy to
get around brokenness in your product. this is
I'm nursing a touch of a foul mood too. (The missus and I were out at
a birthday party last night a little later than we should have.)
sympathies. don't drink, though freebsd ports causes me to reconsider
I'm going to gym to shake out the bad attitudes, what are you doing?
going back to
On 3/22/14 11:38 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
I'm nursing a touch of a foul mood too. (The missus and I were out at
a birthday party last night a little later than we should have.)
sympathies. don't drink, though freebsd ports causes me to reconsider
It might loosen you up!
I'm going to gym to
Honest question, have you been building things from source under
debian's ports or are you using their version of pkg?
the latter
and i have two 9 systems where i try to use freebsd-update. also a
time-consuming rabbit hole leading nowhere pleasant. e.g.
# freebsd-update upgrade -r
On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
from another team member, also a long time freebsd user of decades
firefox build bombs because something has hardwired gcc47, which is
not installed, so firefox's ./configure bombs testing hello world.
Attempting to figure out what has
On 3/22/14 11:49 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Honest question, have you been building things from source under
debian's ports or are you using their version of pkg?
the latter
Ok then, well then you should be using pkg if you want to do a fair
apples to apples comparison.
Otherwise you're
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
from another team member, also a long time freebsd user of decades
firefox build bombs because something has hardwired gcc47, which is
not installed, so firefox's
Forgot to reply to list.
Typos and terseness brought to you by the LG G2 running SlimKat.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com
Date: Mar 22, 2014 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: reason 23 why we've moved to linux
To: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
Cc:
On Mar 22, 2014 11
Ok then, well then you should be using pkg if you want to do a fair
apples to apples comparison.
as i said, pkg also fails every day in weird and wonderful ways.
That is quite annoying! I don't happen to use FreeBSD update, but
honestly posting a log of this as a fresh message to the
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 03:49:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
and i have two 9 systems where i try to use freebsd-update. also a
time-consuming rabbit hole leading nowhere pleasant. e.g.
# freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE-p3
Lose the -p3, because freebsd-update will get you to the
On 03/22/2014 01:57 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
snip
At least testing branches would be appreciated.
Something like ivoras@ suggested two years ago?
On 03/22/14 14:00, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
On 03/22/2014 01:57 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
snip
At least testing branches would be appreciated.
Something like ivoras@
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
[snip]
there will always be a few bugs. otoh, with freebsd ports, there may be
a few working paths, but they are damned hard to find. and there is
very viable competition. many long time freebsd users are leaving, yes
On 22/03/2014 23:15, Royce Williams wrote:
To this day, I still have an 8.3 jail that complains:
pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a
repository configuration file
... but I don't actually have a pkg.conf in that jail, and 'grep -r
PACKAGESITE /' yields no hits.
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 03:19:21 +0900
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
What about using pkg(1) and what version of FreeBSD are you on?
what about standing on my left foot and chewing gum? you're down in
the kinky world where the customer has to spend serious time and
energy to get around
strange. Whenever I come in touch with Linux, I have the feeling that
the people better would have kept Windows on their machine.
the first time i logged on to a linux system, i said `ls`, it came out
in color, and i walked away.
i have been a freebsd lover for a couple of decades, and 4.3
On Mar 22, 2014, at 2:44 PM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/22/14 14:00, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
On 03/22/2014 01:57 PM, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/22/14 11:12, Randy Bush wrote:
On Mar 22, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
strange. Whenever I come in touch with Linux, I have the feeling that
the people better would have kept Windows on their machine.
+1, liked, upvoted, favorited, pinned, retweeted
the first time i logged on to a linux system, i
Hi,
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:40:36 +0900
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
strange. Whenever I come in touch with Linux, I have the feeling
that the people better would have kept Windows on their machine.
the first time i logged on to a linux system, i said `ls`, it came out
in color, and i
Ugh, that's a mess, I haven't seen that personally, but I just tend to
pull from git, although that takes a long time.
Using git lets me keep local changes easily.
The other option that works is just using portsnap. I think portsnap
auto or portsnap alfred should work for getting your the
Ugh, that's a mess, I haven't seen that personally, but I just tend to
pull from git, although that takes a long time.
Using git lets me keep local changes easily.
The other option that works is just using portsnap. I think portsnap
auto or portsnap alfred should work for getting your
On 3/18/14, 9:56 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Ugh, that's a mess, I haven't seen that personally, but I just tend to
pull from git, although that takes a long time.
Using git lets me keep local changes easily.
The other option that works is just using portsnap. I think portsnap
auto or portsnap
31 matches
Mail list logo
