On 14 October 2016 at 21:22, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 14/10/2016 6:48 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> > After some rudimentary performance testing I note that we get up
> > around 3% improvement in application performance when we use gcc5 for
> > our package builds.
> >
> > However building ports
On 14/10/2016 6:48 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> After some rudimentary performance testing I note that we get up
> around 3% improvement in application performance when we use gcc5 for
> our package builds.
>
> However building ports with gcc results in gcc5 being a dependency.
> Examining ldd,
On 14/10/2016 12:48 AM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
After some rudimentary performance testing I note that we get up around 3%
improvement in application performance when we use gcc5 for our package
builds.
However building ports with gcc results in gcc5 being a dependency.
Examining ldd, we find th
After some rudimentary performance testing I note that we get up around 3%
improvement in application performance when we use gcc5 for our package
builds.
However building ports with gcc results in gcc5 being a dependency.
Examining ldd, we find that rarely does anything require gcc5's shared libs
