On 2021-05-14 15:15, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Chris (portmas...@bsdforge.com):
The problem I'm addressing in this case; is that the following as
*always* worked for licenses which carried a copy in
${WRKSRC}/LICENSE_NAME:
The problem you're trying to address is only a consecutive
## Chris (portmas...@bsdforge.com):
> The problem I'm addressing in this case; is that the following as
> *always* worked for licenses which carried a copy in
> ${WRKSRC}/LICENSE_NAME:
The problem you're trying to address is only a consecutive error and
not the real problem.
As I wrote in my
On 2021-05-14 14:19, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Chris (portmas...@bsdforge.com):
> but the way it currently interacts
> with your port is not that fine: in the very least, it overwrites
> your LICENSE variables, which cannot be your intention. (Try
> "make -V LICENSE" in
## Chris (portmas...@bsdforge.com):
> > but the way it currently interacts
> > with your port is not that fine: in the very least, it overwrites
> > your LICENSE variables, which cannot be your intention. (Try
> > "make -V LICENSE" in kde-icons-nuovoext2).
> Sorry. My bad. LGPL3 is now included
On 2021-05-13 09:08, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Chris (portmas...@bsdforge.com):
HOWEVER the error returned by pkg-fallout@ makes absolutely no
sense at all, given the Makefile for the report contains only:
Foremost, that Makefile has an .include, and that's where the mess
(for this
## Chris (portmas...@bsdforge.com):
> HOWEVER the error returned by pkg-fallout@ makes absolutely no
> sense at all, given the Makefile for the report contains only:
Foremost, that Makefile has an .include, and that's where the mess
(for this use case) happens.
>From a quick glance, I'm not
I'm getting the following report from pkg-fallout@:
License not correctly defined: defining both LICENSE_FILE and LICENSE_TEXT is
not allowed
for
x11-themes/kde-icons-nuovext2
HOWEVER the error returned by pkg-fallout@ makes absolutely no
sense at all, given the Makefile for the report
