https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231392
--- Comment #20 from Ting-Wei Lan ---
(In reply to Steve Wills from comment #19)
Yes, but at least it avoids having duplicate code in ports. So we are going
back to making a metaport for each fonttools feature?
--
You are receiving this m
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231392
--- Comment #19 from Steve Wills ---
(In reply to Ting-Wei Lan from comment #18)
Thanks for the proposed patch! I think this doesn't look like the best approach
because it moves where we put the incorrect dependency from the ports
themselve
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231392
--- Comment #18 from Ting-Wei Lan ---
Created attachment 205770
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=205770&action=edit
Add a USES=fonttools macro to handle optional features
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233723
Ralph Bacolod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@devsphoto.com
--- Comment #10
