dependency on
security/py-pycrypto)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/248307
Thank you,
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe
with
security/py-cryptography
https://bugs.freebsd.org/248712
Thank you,
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send
On 2020/07/27 23:11, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 28/07/2020 12:29 pm, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>> On 2020/07/27 22:08, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>>> On 28/07/2020 5:43 am, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>>>> Greetings FreeBSD Python,
>>>>
>>>> I have been mull
On 2020/07/27 22:08, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 28/07/2020 5:43 am, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>> Greetings FreeBSD Python,
>>
>> I have been mulling over a thing and would like the list's perspective
>> before I decide whether to take action or not.
>>
>> sec
/Crypto/Util/_raw_api.py#L71-L161
[1]
https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome/blob/v3.9.8/lib/Crypto/Util/_raw_api.py#L163-L263
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heisenbug
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2019/11/09 22:53, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would appreciate feedback on D22162 [0], which has been open since
> about this time two weeks ago, to enable resolution of bug 240084 [1].
>
> Another patch release [2] has been published in the mean time.
tin: Contact me off-list if you like with an alternate email address.
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
s! It took me a while to clean up after the
> 12/openssl111 update.
>
Thank you, Kurt.
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2018/10/26 19:41, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> On 2018/10/06 16:31, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>> Hello FreeBSD-Python,
>>
>> Are there any friendly neighborhood committers available to take
>> Nathan's patch [0]?
>>
>> [0] https://bugs.freebsd.org/231189
>
On 2018/10/06 16:31, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> Hello FreeBSD-Python,
>
> Are there any friendly neighborhood committers available to take
> Nathan's patch [0]?
>
> [0] https://bugs.freebsd.org/231189
Hello FreeBSD Ports,
Nathan's patch hasn't been getting any love over
Hello FreeBSD-Python,
Are there any friendly neighborhood committers available to take
Nathan's patch [0]?
[0] https://bugs.freebsd.org/231189
Thank you,
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
py-kerberos: Upgrade to 1.3.0
https://bugs.freebsd.org/230385
Thank you,
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello FreeBSD-Python,
Are there any friendly neighborhood committers available to take this
patch [0]?
[0] https://bugs.freebsd.org/229639
Thank you,
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2018/03/01 23:04, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> These new ports have not gotten any committer love for some time. I
> would appreciate any feedback or to have them added to the ports tree.
[...]
> 2017-12-26
> www/py-flask-moment
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/224587
>
> 2017-12-26
://bugs.freebsd.org/224587
2017-12-26
mail/py-flask-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/224588
2018-01-16
security/py-flask-kerberos
https://bugs.freebsd.org/225199
2018-01-16
security/py-flask-saml
https://bugs.freebsd.org/225202
Thank you,
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
On 2018/01/31 07:46, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> Hello FreeBSD Python,
>
> I believe we have reached the two week maintainer timeout on bug 225201
> [0]. A tested patch has been ready to commit since 2018-01-16T00:50:25Z.
>
> Are there any committers within earshot able and willin
with
security/py-pycryptodome and add LICENSE
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225198
Thank you,
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
0x474ABD3C1A7B3F70 (expires 2018-03-14)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225201
Thank you,
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
0x474ABD3C1A7B3F70 (expires 2018-03-14)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225188
Thank you,
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
0x474ABD3C1A7B3F70 (expires 2018-03-14)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2018/01/29 21:20, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On Jan 29, 2018, at 8:55 PM, Dan Langille <d...@langille.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 29, 2018, at 8:26 PM, John W. O'Brien <j...@saltant.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello FreeBSD Python,
>>>
>>
GSSError UNKNOWN_SERVER
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204899
Thank you,
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
0x33C4D64B895DBF3B
0x474ABD3C1A7B3F70 (expires 2018-03-14)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Awaiting maintainer feedback since 2017-02-18 16:01:53 UTC (3 weeks).
[PATCH] textproc/py-markdown: Update to 2.6.8
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217203
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2/20/17 10:48, tech-lists wrote:
> Hello,
>
> system: freebsd11-stable r312829 / ports: 434441
>
> How can I set (or is it desirable to set) the default python version to
> python3? Isn't 2.7 ancient?
>
> I have the following installed:
>
> root@hp:/usr/ports/lang/python3 # python --version
On 2/19/17 14:44, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> On 2/19/17 12:04, Axel Rau wrote:
>> After upgrading twisted from 16.6.0 to 17.1.0 I’m getting:
>>
>> Starting caldavd.
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/local/bin/twistd", line 6, in
>&g
On 2/19/17 12:04, Axel Rau wrote:
> After upgrading twisted from 16.6.0 to 17.1.0 I’m getting:
>
> Starting caldavd.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/local/bin/twistd", line 6, in
> from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
> File
On 2/14/17 00:47, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> Le lundi 13 février 2017 à 18:56 -0500, John W. O'Brien a écrit :
>> Awaiting maintainer approval since 2017-01-29 16:04:40 UTC (2 weeks).
>>
>> textproc/py-pygments: add concurrent to USE_PYTHON
>> https://bugs.freebs
Awaiting maintainer approval since 2017-01-29 15:35:05 UTC (2 weeks).
textproc/py-tabletext: configure target fails under py3k with
UnicodeDecodeError
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216208
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Awaiting maintainer approval since 2017-01-29 22:22:28 UTC (2 weeks).
[PATCH] www/py-pelican: Concurrent install is ineffective without
PKGNAMEPREFIX
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216585
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Awaiting maintainer approval since 2017-01-29 20:23:04 UTC (2 weeks).
[PATCH] devel/py-tables: Enable concurrent installs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216580
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Awaiting maintainer approval since 2017-01-29 21:39:58 UTC (2 weeks).
[PATCH] devel/py-jmespath: Enable concurrent installs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216583
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Awaiting maintainer approval since 2017-01-29 16:04:40 UTC (2 weeks).
textproc/py-pygments: add concurrent to USE_PYTHON
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214295
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Doubly linked breadcrumbs:
devel/py-setuptools: egg_info fails under python 3.4.6 on nonexistent
MANIFEST graft
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216953
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2/4/17 15:56, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> On 1/7/17 19:11, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>> Are there any friendly neighborhood Python-oriented committers who would
>> be willing to pick up ports/215201, open and awaiting maintainer
>> feedback since 2016-12-10 (4 weeks)?
>>
&g
On 1/7/17 19:11, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> Are there any friendly neighborhood Python-oriented committers who would
> be willing to pick up ports/215201, open and awaiting maintainer
> feedback since 2016-12-10 (4 weeks)?
>
> [PATCH] www/py-pelican: build fails on RUN_DEPE
On 1/31/17 10:21, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> On 1/29/17 21:45, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>> At some point between 2017-01-17T07:39:59-05:00
>> 2017-01-23T10:48:15-05:00, some ports started failing to build under
>> python3.4 (not 3.5 or 3.6). The failure occurs during the poudriere
On 1/29/17 21:45, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> At some point between 2017-01-17T07:39:59-05:00
> 2017-01-23T10:48:15-05:00, some ports started failing to build under
> python3.4 (not 3.5 or 3.6). The failure occurs during the poudriere
> stage phase while processing the MANIFEST
Hi Nikolai,
On 1/29/17 23:18, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> I think the biggest controversy is that binary names are suffixed, which
> may not be what upstream projects like and/or document.
> It may be confusing to users as well.
>
> If we can get rid of the suffix for PYTHON_CONCURRENT_INSTALL for
On 1/30/17 14:43, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 08:26:27PM -0500, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>> Thank you for your input.
>>
>> On 1/29/17 19:50, Roland Smith wrote:
>> [...]
>>> There also seems to be a trend of separate py3-* ports. This is somet
On 1/29/17 14:22, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 29 January 2017 at 11:08, John W. O'Brien <j...@saltant.com> wrote:
>> Hello FreeBSD Python,
>> On the
>> other hand, there are lots of ports for which concurrent is a no-op, and
>> lots more that don't support python3 a
On 1/29/17 14:08, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> There is a growing list of bugs [...] in my queue and perhaps others'
> to submit ([4]).
> [...]
> [4] devel/py-boto, devel/py-tables, devel/pep8, devel/flake8
It just goes to show how much dust my queue has accumulated. devel/pep8
is don
Hello FreeBSD Python,
One of the most common problems I encounter with python3
interoperability is when the concurrent option is needed and can be
trivially enabled. There is a growing list of bugs where this, on a
individual port basis, has been fixed ([0], [1]), is in progress ([2],
[3]), or is
Hello all,
Are there any friendly neighborhood Python-oriented committers who would
be willing to pick up ports/215201, open and awaiting maintainer
feedback since 2016-12-10 (4 weeks)?
[PATCH] www/py-pelican: build fails on RUN_DEPENDS non-default python
On 5/27/15 7:14 AM, John W. O'Brien wrote:
[adding freebsd-python@ back]
On 5/27/15 1:41 AM, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
On 05/26/2015 16:00, John W. O'Brien wrote:
On 5/22/15 9:57 PM, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
Trying my hand at Data SCIENCE (tm) with a combination of
ipython notebooks
[adding freebsd-python@ back]
On 5/27/15 1:41 AM, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
On 05/26/2015 16:00, John W. O'Brien wrote:
On 5/22/15 9:57 PM, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
Trying my hand at Data SCIENCE (tm) with a combination of
ipython notebooks and numpy/scipy, I seem to have stumbled upon
On 5/22/15 9:57 PM, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
Trying my hand at Data SCIENCE (tm) with a combination of ipython
notebooks and numpy/scipy, I seem to have stumbled upon weirdness we
already considered fixed:
ImportError: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by
On 12/1/14 4:01 AM, Marcus von Appen wrote:
Zitat von Andrew Berg aberg...@my.hennepintech.edu:
On 2014.11.30 08:23, John W. O'Brien wrote:
On 11/29/14 11:40 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2014.11.29 22:00, John W. O'Brien wrote:
Let's say that I want to build net/py-pyzmq with
PYTHON_VERSION
On 11/29/14 11:40 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2014.11.29 22:00, John W. O'Brien wrote:
Let's say that I want to build net/py-pyzmq with
PYTHON_VERSION=python3.4.
Why this instead of using DEFAULT_VERSIONS?
I was following this advice:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python/2014
Hello FreeBSD-Python (and mva),
I think there is a bug, either in Mk/Uses/python.mk or in
lang/python{2,3}, or perhaps both, and I would appreciate some review of
my analysis that follows to validate or correct it. I'm sorry if I'm
stumbling along well-trod ground here.
Let's say that I want to
Is there anything I can or should do about this on the pandas side?
---SNIP---
===phase: configure
=== Configuring for py27-pandas-0.14.0
Download error on https://pypi.python.org/simple/numpy/: [Errno 49]
Can't assign requested address --
On 5/18/14 12:30 AM, Irjohn Junus wrote:
Thank you for looking at this. Apologies for my late reply it's been
crazy busy at work lately.
I completely understand. As you can probably tell, my situation is similar.
Here's answers to your questions:
1. What is the rpath stored in your copy
to link using
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc47
after upgrading gcc port a few days ago, which is described in your link
[0]. Do I issue this command as root? Need advice here, thanks.
Regards,
Irjohn
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:42 AM, John W. O'Brien j...@saltant.com
mailto:j
On 4/18/14 8:45 AM, Irjohn Junus wrote:
Dear All,
I'm running 9.1-RELEASE and today just after freebsd-update to p11 and
updating ports to the latest found out that pandas won't import after
MySQLdb is imported first. Strangely, it will import no problem if
MySQLdb is imported after:
Hi
On April 18, 2014 8:45:46 AM EST, Irjohn Junus i.ju...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
I'm running 9.1-RELEASE and today just after freebsd-update to p11 and
updating ports to the latest found out that pandas won't import after
MySQLdb is imported first. Strangely, it will import no problem if
MySQLdb
On 2/15/14 4:20 PM, ed...@freebsd.org wrote:
Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] math/py-pandas: Update to 0.13.1
[...]
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Feb 15 21:20:16 UTC 2014
[...]
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=186802
Hello python@,
Is a friendly neighborhood committer available to take this?
Hello freebsd-python@,
This is a call for testing for math/py-pandas, using a snapshot from the
upstream repository [0]. My assessment is that the project is likely to
release 0.13.0 soon, but I have no visibility into precisely when. If
you are able, please test the latest development version of
Hello wen@, sunpoet@, and python@,
I just wanted to call your attention to this because it might warrant a
mention in UPDATING, though the hdf5 error message is helpfully verbose.
Rebuilding devel/py-tables after the upgrade fixes this. Other ports
that depend upon science/hdf5-18 are likely
On 7/27/13 9:20 AM, ed...@freebsd.org wrote:
Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] math/py-pandas: Update to 0.12.0
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs-freebsd-python
Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jul 27 13:20:08 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
freebsd-python@
On 7/27/13 10:25 AM, John W. O'Brien wrote:
[...]
- test_pytables_native_read (pandas.io.tests.test_pytables.TestHDFStore)
This is somewhat more concerning, but it may be a problem with the
devel/py-tables soft dependency.
Yes, pandas appears to be blameless in this case as demonstrated
The following reply was made to PR ports/180889; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John W. O'Brien j...@saltant.com
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, w...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/180889: [MAINTAINER] math/py-pandas: Update to 0.12.0
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 12:51
On 7/27/13 10:25 AM, John W. O'Brien wrote:
[...]
- test_read_dta10 (pandas.io.tests.test_stata.StataTests)
- test_stata_doc_examples (pandas.io.tests.test_stata.StataTests)
- test_write_dta5 (pandas.io.tests.test_stata.StataTests)
- test_write_dta6 (pandas.io.tests.test_stata.StataTests
The following reply was made to PR ports/180889; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John W. O'Brien j...@saltant.com
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/180889: [MAINTAINER] math/py-pandas: Update to 0.12.0
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:01:11 -0400
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
freebsd-python@: Looping in math/py-matplotlib maintainer
Geoffrey:
See the earlier part of this thread for background.
A pandas dev and I just discovered that one of the pandas test
failures is induced because the value sys.getdefaultencoding()
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/20/2013 07:21 PM, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
On 4/20/13 8:46 PM, John W. O'Brien wrote:
freebsd-python@: Looping in math/py-matplotlib maintainer See the
earlier part of this thread for background.
A pandas dev and I just discovered that one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to y-p over at the pandas github project, I have isolated the
root cause of both test failures. While I will continue to monitor the
upcoming release, and contribute as it seems necessary, final
resolution is now in upstream hands.
This is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When applied together, the two attached patches implement a very rough
example of the B option I described in my 2013-02-23 response to
ports/175276.
I have smoke tested this patch by building and installing from scratch
some representative ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/2013 05:09 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
Can anyone on this list please review the following. I am not certain
it is good advice.
diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.xml
b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.xml
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
1. Should this be assigned to freebsd-python@?
I realize that freebsd-gnome@ is the maintainer, but the root cause
lies with the way Python ports use PKGNAMEPREFIX, and this is not the
only affected port.
2. Allow me to elaborate on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I tripped over this today while doing a trial build of math/py-pandas
under lang/python32.
# pkg_info -xoQ python distribute nose pandas
py32-distribute-0.6.34:devel/py-distribute
py32-nose-1.2.1:devel/py-nose
py32-pandas-0.10.1:math/py-pandas
The following reply was made to PR ports/172528; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John W. O'Brien j...@saltant.com
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/172528: [maintainer update] [patch] Update math/py-pandas
to 0.9.0
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:38:00 -0400
Per [HEADS UP
The following reply was made to PR ports/169168; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John W. O'Brien j...@saltant.com
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/169168: New port: math/py-pandas Flexible, high-performance
data analysis in Python
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:25:11 -0400
70 matches
Mail list logo
