On 2020/07/27 23:11, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 28/07/2020 12:29 pm, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>> On 2020/07/27 22:08, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>>> On 28/07/2020 5:43 am, John W. O'Brien wrote:
Greetings FreeBSD Python,
I have been mulling over a thing and would like the list's perspective
On 28/07/2020 12:29 pm, John W. O'Brien wrote:
On 2020/07/27 22:08, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 28/07/2020 5:43 am, John W. O'Brien wrote:
Greetings FreeBSD Python,
I have been mulling over a thing and would like the list's perspective
before I decide whether to take action or not.
On 2020/07/27 22:08, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 28/07/2020 5:43 am, John W. O'Brien wrote:
>> Greetings FreeBSD Python,
>>
>> I have been mulling over a thing and would like the list's perspective
>> before I decide whether to take action or not.
>>
>> security/py-pycryptodome will use
On 28/07/2020 5:43 am, John W. O'Brien wrote:
Greetings FreeBSD Python,
I have been mulling over a thing and would like the list's perspective
before I decide whether to take action or not.
security/py-pycryptodome will use devel/py-cffi if it is available [0]
or ctypes otherwise [1]. This
Greetings FreeBSD Python,
I have been mulling over a thing and would like the list's perspective
before I decide whether to take action or not.
security/py-pycryptodome will use devel/py-cffi if it is available [0]
or ctypes otherwise [1]. This makes me just a little bit uneasy since it
leaves
