the user has
3, or 4 versions it seems harder. Not to mention if malloc
option was added, which appends an m to ${PYTHON_SUFFIX}
How does everyone deal with this sort of thing?
Thank you for all your time, and consideration.
--Chris
___
freebs
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:41:59 +1100 ko...@freebsd.org said
On 4/03/2020 5:58 am, Chris wrote:
> I'm dragging some code into the 21st century. I'm happy to
> say the python37 AST now gives it a clean bill of health.
> But I'm (currently) only able to build it by prepending
> the pyth
ng this error.
As a side question related to llvm80; why is an AMD GPU even involved?
--Chris
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
away. :-)
Thank you in advance for any insight into all this.
--Chris
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
/python3.7m/
changing the include to:
#include
solves this. But this is not a tenable solution. Does the ports
framework provide for this? I think FLAVOR only returns py(flavor.number)
not python(flavor.number)
Thanks for any insight.
--Chris
___
freebsd-python
On 2020-12-11 14:41, Douglas Thrift wrote:
On 12/11/2020 2:06 PM, Chris wrote:
Hello all,
I'm working on a port I maintain to become py3x compatible.
I'm down to one lousy error:
passwd.py", line 25 chmod(self.pw_file, 0600)
^
SyntaxError: invalid token
I
urned:
chmod(self.pw_file, 0o600)
which just seems wrong.
What am I missing -- aside from more familiarity with python3 ;-)
Thanks!
--Chris
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe,
On 2020-12-11 14:06, Chris wrote:
Hello all,
I'm working on a port I maintain to become py3x compatible.
I'm down to one lousy error:
passwd.py", line 25chmod(self.pw_file, 0600)
^
SyntaxError: invalid token
I tried to sort it, but failed. So allowed 2to3 to
let me know (I do not).
mcl
I mentioned it in the related bugzilla pr(1). But'll repeat it here;
I can take a stab at devel/bzr. I should have something useful by (or before)
the end of the week.
--Chris
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.f
Hi,
This problem has been going on for a number of years, and as far as I
can see there isn't a proper and elegant solution.
A fix is at [1], which should solve the problem, and I'm going to
tinderbox test and commit it if no-one complains.
Chris
[1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches
, even if it did take me ten
minutes to work out how the hell your REINPLACE line worked ;) I've
simplified it a little.
Is it better now? It works in tinderbox so far
http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/python-nis_failed-fix-bffix.diff
Chris
Committed. Thanks!
Thanks also goes to bf@, who has taught me how to use a delimiter other
than / at the beginning of a sed command.
Chris
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean
minimising weird breakage when python
is updated.
Have you a patch? Also, what do other OSes do?
Chris
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr
, this would
solve the package problems. Are you interested if I were to implement
that?
Chris
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr
On 1 December 2012 12:57, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 November 2012 13:24, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
Rafael Espíndola wrote on 27.11.2012 16:29:
Well, if I'm not mistaken had tested CONFIGURE_ARGS = - with-python'',
but had no success, but I could be mistaken
does everyone think?
[1] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/
I'll commit the patch this weekend.
Thank you for tracking this.
Chris
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
Přeposlaná zpráva
[OK, it's not really Pav.]
http://www.bayofrum.net/medusatb/9.1-glib-20130131165817/python33-3.3.0_2.log
I've been doing a mini-exp-run for Koop Mast, and discovered that
python33 fails to package.
Chris
that broken on latest release is
unacceptable?
Is there anything we can fiddle python-side to fix this?
Chris
On 01.02.2013, at 21:53, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Přeposlaná zpráva
[OK, it's not really Pav.]
http://www.bayofrum.net/medusatb/9.1-glib-20130131165817
On 2 February 2013 11:52, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 February 2013 11:29, Dmitry Sivachenko trtrmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02.02.2013, at 15:28, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 February 2013 18:51, Dmitry Sivachenko trtrmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Upgrade to 9-STABLE
On 3 February 2013 06:51, Kubilay Kocak koobs.free...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/02/2013 12:33 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 2 February 2013 11:52, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 February 2013 11:29, Dmitry Sivachenko trtrmi...@gmail.com
wrote
?
Chris
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
The following reply was made to PR ports/178242; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Chris Dukes chris.dukes@gmail.com
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, chris.dukes@gmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/178242: bsd.python.mk injection of @exec easy_install to
PLIST creates inappropriate post
question is that I maintain the Tryton application
framework which consists of ~50 small modules. Currently each of them has
its own port. I might bundle them together on one port to simplify
maintenance.
Usually a master/slave configuration is more appropriate. Are you familiar
with those?
Chris
The following reply was made to PR ports/133081; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/133081: [bsd.python.mk] PYEASYINSTALL_ARCHDEP=yes makes
broken packages
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 17:46:01
Hi all,
I don't know how many of you were following this, but it looks fine to
me... any of you mind if I commit it?
Chris
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net
Date: 3 June 2013 15:50
Subject: Re: svn commit: r250991 - in head:
contrib/jemalloc
Why symbolic instead of hard?
Chris
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 16 June 2013 14:57, nemysis nemy...@gmx.ch wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:34:27 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
Why symbolic instead of hard?
Chris
When is in Makefile
${LN} ${EASYINSTALL_PTH}.dist ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/distribute.pth
/usr/local/bin/python2.7 -m py_compile
crontab isn't using a PATH for your specified user, so you need to give an
absolute path.
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:02:06 -0700 Craig Rodrigues
lt;rodr...@freebsd.orggt; wrote
On Wed, Jun 10
gt; Here is how I'm calling the script in crontab:
gt; PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
gt;
I
the final generated plist then in the normal ports
directory:
% make package
% less `make -VTMPPLIST`
(those are backticks).
It's probably harmless to have a file listed twice, but if you list the
actual config file it gets blown away on each update.
Cheers,
Chris
--
This message has been
29 matches
Mail list logo
