On 3/2/18 6:40 PM, Yuri wrote:
> If the port can only be used as an app, as opposed to library, multiple
> flavors aren't needed. All users care about is an executable. It doesn't
> matter what python version is used.
That's what sane^Wyou and I would think. :-)
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 06:57:51PM
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 05:49:43PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 18/04/2020 5:10 pm, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 06:28:06AM +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > I never understood why portname should be lowercase if upstream considers
> > &g
Hi there,
Simple question: I am thinking about adding some Python modules to our
Collection; can I set MAINTAINER to python@ or I must set it to myself?
Thanks.
./danfe
___
freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:29:52PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> Currently python@ maintains the lang/python* ports and some "key
> ports". And it is not recommended add a new port setting MAINTAINER
> to python@ unless this port is really needed to maintained by the
> python team.
Fair enough; I wa
