https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239792
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239792
--- Comment #7 from Terry Kennedy ---
(In reply to Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh from comment #6)
Now I understand. I only have a small number of ports on my test system and I
had previously checked for "USES= python:2.7" among them, and the only
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239792
--- Comment #6 from Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh ---
(In reply to Terry Kennedy from comment #4)
Sorry, I did not say it clearly.
The scons patch itself is fine.
Unfortunately, the complete patch should contain fixes for more than half of
its de
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239792
Antoine Brodin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|Open
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239792
--- Comment #4 from Terry Kennedy ---
(In reply to Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh from comment #3)
Yes, I think the change to a Python 3 default was a little premature.
What is incomplete about this patch? I have used it (patch < thisfile; make
ma
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239792
--- Comment #3 from Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh ---
(In reply to Terry Kennedy from comment #0)
The scons update itself is not a problem. The real problem is to relax
USES=python after the default version changed from 2.7 to 3.6. Most of its
co
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239792
Terry Kennedy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #206459|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239792
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa
Summary|[patch
