Re: Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-17 Thread Gerhard Schmidt
Am 17.10.2016 um 14:03 schrieb Vlad K.: > On 2016-10-17 13:27, Gerhard Schmidt wrote: >> >> Please do not break systems without a really good reason. This we can >> discus in 4 years when support for python2 will end, but not until than. > > I agree with the bit of "let's not break systems", but

Re: Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-17 Thread Vlad K.
On 2016-10-17 13:27, Gerhard Schmidt wrote: Please do not break systems without a really good reason. This we can discus in 4 years when support for python2 will end, but not until than. I agree with the bit of "let's not break systems", but not with the second part. Meanwhile, pkg

Re: Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-17 Thread Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
Gerhard Schmidt wrote on 10/17/2016 14:27: Am 17.10.2016 um 12:39 schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov: Gerhard Schmidt wrote on 10/17/2016 11:07: Am 16.10.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov: - if port has a build dependency upon python and it can be built both with python2 and python3, force

Re: Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-17 Thread Gerhard Schmidt
Am 17.10.2016 um 12:39 schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov: > Gerhard Schmidt wrote on 10/17/2016 11:07: >> Am 16.10.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov: >>> - if port has a build dependency upon python and it can be built both >>> with python2 and python3, force it to build with python3 >>> - if

Re: Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-17 Thread Vlad K.
On 2016-10-17 12:35, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: What I actually meant is to utilize USES=python:3.3+ for such ports, to make it pick up default python3 version. Yeah I "misunderstood you correctly", heh, sorry I wanted to say two different things at once The only problem with that

Re: Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-17 Thread Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
Gerhard Schmidt wrote on 10/17/2016 11:07: Am 16.10.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov: - if port has a build dependency upon python and it can be built both with python2 and python3, force it to build with python3 - if some standalone application can be running both with python2 and

Re: Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-17 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:35:45PM +0300, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > Ok, PHB was just an example. But it should be some "authoritative" place to > encourage people to change their ports and to prevent adding of new ports > without specific python version set (I still see many new ports added

Re: Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-17 Thread Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
Vlad K. wrote on 10/17/2016 13:04: Hi all! On 2016-10-17 09:47, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 17/10/2016 6:22 AM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: - if port has a build dependency upon python and it can be built both with python2 and python3, force it to build with python3 - if some standalone

Re: Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-17 Thread Vlad K.
Hi all! On 2016-10-17 09:47, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 17/10/2016 6:22 AM, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: - if port has a build dependency upon python and it can be built both with python2 and python3, force it to build with python3 - if some standalone application can be running both with

Re: Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-17 Thread Gerhard Schmidt
Am 16.10.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov: > - if port has a build dependency upon python and it can be built both > with python2 and python3, force it to build with python3 > - if some standalone application can be running both with python2 and > python3 and it have equivalent python3

Introducing python3 into user system

2016-10-16 Thread Ruslan Makhmatkhanov
Hi, Python 2.7 will have no upstream support after 2020, and right now it no more getting new features. So I'd want to start poisoning^W introducing python3 into user system via ports tree and here is what I suggest to start to do right now: - if port has a build dependency upon python