On Tuesday 26 of April 2011 04:38:29, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> Also:
> [root@nbserver1 /usr/home/ryanc]# ifconfig
> em0: flags=8943 metric 0
> mtu 1500 options=98
> ether 00:14:22:15:dc:65
> inet 192.168.46.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.46.255
> media: Ethernet autosel
Good morning,
I have a small server with an SSD drive in it that is having some problems.
Notably, dmesg has been repeatedly reporting the following error message:
g_vfs_done():ad0s1a[READ(offset=-574217714356717568,
length=16384)]error = 5
I realize that the best course of action is t
Hi Fred,
The make clean went ok. The make patch:
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
===> Found saved configuration for latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
===> Extracting for latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for cjk-4.8.2.tar
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:29:08PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:54:20 -0400
> Bob Hall wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:46:33PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Bob Hall wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:18:46PM +0100, RW wrote:
> > > >
Also:
[root@nbserver1 /usr/home/ryanc]# ifconfig
em0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu
1500
options=98
ether 00:14:22:15:dc:65
inet 192.168.46.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.46.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT )
status: active
tap0: flags=8943 metric
I've got an OpenVPN connection working to my remote server, but I want to route
the traffic to the local LAN.
I have a bridge set up, pingable... but can't ping the em1 (192.168.46.2) from
the remote machine.
Server.conf:
local 192.168.46.2
port 1194
proto udp
dev tap
ca keys/cacert.pem
cert ke
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Daniel Staal wrote:
> --As of April 25, 2011 7:43:33 PM -0500, Antonio Olivares is alleged to have
> said:
>
>> I don't know which one to use, is there a page, howto (build a
>> firewall or convert an existing one) to use here? All I want is to be
>> allowed to vi
--As of April 25, 2011 7:43:33 PM -0500, Antonio Olivares is alleged to
have said:
I don't know which one to use, is there a page, howto (build a
firewall or convert an existing one) to use here? All I want is to be
allowed to visit websites but don't allow anyone out there to come in
somehow
Dear kind folks,
Is there an easy firewall setup available somewhere(like the one
referenced below but for FreeBSD)?
i.e, like I saw reading in Distrowatch an easy way(using a page on the
net: http://connie.slackware.com/~alien/efg/)
I have read that there is pf and there is an implementation b
Hi there,
I've recently migrated my old laptop to a new one (both running R8.2 +
ZFS). Used zfs send/recv and corrected mountpoints.
On the old laptop I had my / sitting in zpool, on the new one I've
created a separate zpool/root for /.
Everything is working OK except one strangeness - the boot lo
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:54:20 -0400
Bob Hall wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:46:33PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Bob Hall wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:18:46PM +0100, RW wrote:
> > >> I don't believe the heap is allocated zeroed pages. The kernel
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:17:40PM +1000, Daniel Marsh wrote:
What you need to verify is the default routes on the client hosts. It's very
likely your packets and your initial route add commands on your dual host
machine are correct, yet the return route on the other clients are
incorrect.
I ha
Hi,
can I safely use GPTs within a GEOM_MIRROR?
I created a new mirror and then used gpart to create additinal
partitions. dmesg gives:
the secondary GPT header is not in the last LBA
As far as I read by now it seems safe to ignore that message but I want
to get sure.
Or are mirrored GPTs only
On 24 April 2011 17:21, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> Em Ter, 2011-04-12 às 13:33 +0200, Lars Wilke escreveu:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are quite a few threads about ZFS and performance difficulties,
> > but i did not find anything that really helped :)
> > Therefor any advice would be highly app
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:46:33PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Bob Hall wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:18:46PM +0100, RW wrote:
> >> I don't believe the heap is allocated zeroed pages. The kernel
> >> does allocate such pages to the BSS segment, but that's
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Bob Hall wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:18:46PM +0100, RW wrote:
>> I don't believe the heap is allocated zeroed pages. The kernel
>> does allocate such pages to the BSS segment, but that's because it
>> holds zeroed data such as C static variables.
>
> Accor
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:18:46PM +0100, RW wrote:
> I don't believe the heap is allocated zeroed pages. The kernel
> does allocate such pages to the BSS segment, but that's because it
> holds zeroed data such as C static variables.
According to McKusick and Neville-Neil's book on FreeBSD, sbrk
Hello Fred,
Fred writes:
> I ran into a problem when updating ports on 8.1-RELEASE (i386).
> ~/print/latex-cjk doesn't want to build.
>
> ===> Patching for latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
> Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
> 1 out of 1 hun
On 23 April 2011 23:48, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 3:36 PM, krad wrote:
>
>> not sure about that as the auto mounts are done when /etc/rc.d/zfs runs so
>> there might be a dependency
>>
>
> Hum yeah you are right. I don't think it would be possible then as all the
> old et
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:53:41 +0200
"C. P. Ghost" wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Modulok wrote:
> > I don't know if this is a problem on FreeBSD...
> >
> > Process A requests memory.
> > Process A Stores a plaintext password in memory or other sensitive
> > data. Process A terminates a
Hello,
I ran into a problem when updating ports on 8.1-RELEASE (i386).
~/print/latex-cjk doesn't want to build.
===> Patching for latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects t
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 06:43:11PM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Sorry, it _is_ impossible.
:(
simply put, to communicate _on_ a network, you have to be *ON* that
network, i.e., 'have an address in that network's address-space'.
I don't quite see why this would be required, as long as packets
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 08:50:53PM -0400, David Scheidt wrote:
On Apr 24, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Lionel Fourquaux wrote:
em0 has addresses fe80::1234:56ff:fe78:9abc and 2001:db8::1
em1 has address fe80::1234:56ff:fe78:9abd
Network 2001:db8::/64 is directly attached to em0, and network
2001:db8:0:1::
23 matches
Mail list logo
