Nonaktif

2013-06-07 Thread team_chota
Nonaktiv notivikation Sent from my BlackBerry® powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Nonaktif

2013-06-07 Thread team_chota
Nonaktiv notivikation Sent from my BlackBerry® powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: why is ports web page so far out of date

2013-06-07 Thread Waitman Gobble
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Waitman Gobble gobble...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz wrote: On 05/06/2013 17:00, Waitman Gobble wrote: If you must have a web based version, another option is DIY roll your own ports index based on your

ZFS: raid VS copies=n

2013-06-07 Thread Quartz
Question: How does the ZFS option 'copies=n' and raid relate to and interact with each other? specifically recovery in the event of a failure. For example, is having three disks in a raid-1 configuration with copies=1 effectively the same as having three disks in a raid-0 with copies=3? Are

Re: ZFS: raid VS copies=n

2013-06-07 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
07.06.2013 18:52, Quartz: Question: How does the ZFS option 'copies=n' and raid relate to and interact with each other? specifically recovery in the event of a failure. For example, is having three disks in a raid-1 configuration with copies=1 effectively the same as having three disks in a

Re: ZFS: raid VS copies=n

2013-06-07 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jun 07), Quartz said: How does the ZFS option 'copies=n' and raid relate to and interact with each other? specifically recovery in the event of a failure. For example, is having three disks in a raid-1 configuration with copies=1 effectively the same as having three

9.1-RELEASE slow boot

2013-06-07 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
Hi, Since I updated to 9.1-RELEASE my boot process seems to stall for a while. Booting in verbose mode shows messages like these ones: Opening device da0 - 6 (repeated like 30 times or so) Opening device da1 - 6 (repeated like 30 times or so) Opening device da2 - 6 (repeated like 30 times or so)

Re: 9.1-RELEASE slow boot

2013-06-07 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 19:38:34 +0200, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: Since I updated to 9.1-RELEASE my boot process seems to stall for a while. Booting in verbose mode shows messages like these ones: Opening device da0 - 6 (repeated like 30 times or so) Opening device da1 - 6 (repeated like 30

custom kernel installation

2013-06-07 Thread Norman Khine
hello, i have a dedicated server from OVH and have updated freebsd to 9.1 and want to enable IPFW in the kernel as this is not enabled. the way i updated the system was to copy /boot/kernel.old to /boot/GENERIC then followed ch25

Re: custom kernel installation

2013-06-07 Thread Polytropon
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 00:37:02 +0200, Norman Khine wrote: hello, i have a dedicated server from OVH and have updated freebsd to 9.1 and want to enable IPFW in the kernel as this is not enabled. Why not use the module for this? For many years now, you do not need a custom kernel if you want to use

Re: custom kernel installation

2013-06-07 Thread Norman Khine
thanks for the quick reply On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote: On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 00:37:02 +0200, Norman Khine wrote: hello, i have a dedicated server from OVH and have updated freebsd to 9.1 and want to enable IPFW in the kernel as this is not enabled.

Re: Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-07 Thread lokada...@gmx.de
On 02.06.2013 22:34, Fbsd8 wrote: I'm a sub second speed freak. What is the max number of cpu's and memory size that Freebsd can handle? Can it handle 16 4ghz cpu's and 32gb of memory? I need a gaming server with some really big balls for hundreds of jails. Money is not a deciding factor here,

Re: custom kernel installation

2013-06-07 Thread Polytropon
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 01:17:35 +0200, Norman Khine wrote: thanks for the quick reply You're welcome. On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote: On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 00:37:02 +0200, Norman Khine wrote: hello, i have a dedicated server from OVH and have updated

Re: Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-07 Thread Mark Moellering
On 6/7/2013 7:52 PM, lokada...@gmx.de wrote: On 02.06.2013 22:34, Fbsd8 wrote: I'm a sub second speed freak. What is the max number of cpu's and memory size that Freebsd can handle? Can it handle 16 4ghz cpu's and 32gb of memory? I need a gaming server with some really big balls for hundreds