Greetings to all from Europe.
I would like to know, the data necessary to make a loader diskette
similar to the one used for booting FreeBSD, useful to boot with the
same loader the Windows system.
In other words, I would like to know what kind of operation does the
FreeBSD loader on the
and LTO Ultrium 2 cartridges are more expensive
then DAT 72 and VXA 2 ones. I have not found yet a criterion useful to
choose the most reliable standard. Any suggestion could be useful. I'll
need either to dump or to tar.
Please CC me. Thanks once more.
.VWV.
Original Message
From: Glenn
engines, but nothing more]. The most heavy backup of each
system, is therefore no bigger then 5 GB. Hard disk backups are not
possible, because I cannot write to the NTFS backup disk of the
Disgusting Operating System.
Original Message
From: Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: .VWV. [EMAIL
Salve.
I would like to know, if the following product can be used, in order to
make tape dumps or tape tars with the FreeBSD 4.x.
http://www.certance.com/products/dds-dat/dat72/CD72LWH-SS
Thanks as always - please CC me -
VITTORI
___
Operating System'. The reasons are infinite.
As always
.VWV.
On 2005-06-28 08:47:12 +0200 Dmitry Mityugov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/28/05, . VWV. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Salve.
Please let me know - CC me - eventual commercial developers of custom
code for FreeBSD. As example, moving
to
their ergonomic behaviours, making possible to an autistic to stand in
frond of the monitor.
As always
.VWV.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
On 2005-06-09 05:00:27 +0200 Mike Jeays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 20:58, .VWV. wrote:
ggv
Hello.
I have a problem with ggv whilst trying to read pdf documents, not
ps
documents [attachment]. Moreover, I would like to know what's the
best
resource available to produce
Hi.
I have forgotten to add this consideration to my previous posts.
Even my mum reads postscripts on Wingsdowz by means of Ghostscript and
Ghostgum. As for graphics, there are Gimp, Sodipodi, Dia, ready for
any user of Wingsdowz. Adobe stuff cannot be considered as an
international
ggv
Hello.
Probably this one will be definitely my end question.
I have a problem with ggv whilst trying to read pdf documents, not ps
documents [attachment]. Moreover, I would like to know what's the best
resource available to produce pdf or ps ones. Is it mandatory to pass
through TeX?
Hello.
Chris was right. I have forgotten to upgrade the X server. Both XFree86
and Xorg have the drivers for a lot of radeon gpus now.
Wingsdowz makes me exhausted. It seems I must keep it, in order to run
commercial applications for audio purposes, because it seems easier to
make them run with
Original Message
From: Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: .VWV. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 21 May, 2005 03:51
Subject: Re: radeon
On Friday 20 May 2005 07:11 pm, .VWV. wrote:
Hello.
I was trying to move to RADEON-based cards, but I have
Hello.
Once again, I have problems in order to use any kind of graphical
environment on FreeBSD, therefore I write from Wingsdowz.
I was trying to move to RADEON-based cards, but I have no idea how to
make them work with X servers. I have a mixed-up 4.7 and 4.11 system,
with the kernel of the
I still can't believe what people of GNOME and KDE have done. With GTK 1.x
and KDE 2.x there were only some little adjustments missing, to obtain the
'perfect' desktop, compatible with GNUstep's Windowmaker. They have decided
to follow an endless way instead. I'm temptated of destroying the whole
I have found the cdparanoia binary on the FreeBSD pages, but I still can't
compile it, even having compiled the libgnugetopt 1.2.
What have you done to compile it?
VITTORI
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I'm at one step from having a unix desktop with gtk 1.x, with the gtkstep
style, under GNUstep's Windowmaker, with the most part of the applications.
I miss the Nautilus as for desktop manager.
I have compiled either oaf or nautilus, but that bastard still doesn't
start. I have also searched on
Thank you for your work on this mailing list.
Is there anybody who knows how to correct the starting problems of Nautilus
1.x on 4.6.2 or 4.7?
With my best regards
VITTORI
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hello to all.
I'm happy for the new release.
Otherwise, in my opinion it is necessary to stop this unuseful adoption of
the endless upgrades of KDE and GNOME monsters.
They still are much better than WIN.
There is no stable standard for applications' developers, under such
environments.
After
Hello to all.
Are you sure you really need continuous upgrading your operating system,
until the end of your life?
I'm happy running an 'obsolete' 4.6.2, nobody will move me from it.
Upgrading makes happy only the hardware vendors.
¡Enjoy the life - fight the upgrade system -!
With my best
Hi.
Owing to the need of purchasing a supported video-card before it's too late
for my 4.6.2, I would like to know if the X Window System driver can run
fine or not the ATI 8500. I have noticed the driver is not listed in the
'sysinstall' tool. If I choose 'ati' using xf86config or editing
Hi.
Owing to the need of purchasing a supported video-card before it's too late
for my 4.6.2, I would like to know if the X Window System driver can run
fine or not the ATI 8500. I have noticed the driver is not listed in the
'sysinstall' tool. If I choose 'ati' using xf86config or editing
Hi.
Please, forward this letter to the the correct delivery. I haven't the
strenght necessary to walk online across the mailgroups' environment. Feel
free of copying what you like of the following content, simply making mention
of my name.
If at NASA nobody has realized, rockets fitting the
21 matches
Mail list logo
