--- Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Polling is simply unecessary in most cases. You
could get
better performance using an em driver and setting
max
ints to whatever is optimal for your system.
Polling adds
latency and over head for no good
--- Subhro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 20:53
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 much slower than i386 on
--- jason henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The answer, Boris, is that the team has no idea
what
they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
performance testing. They tune little pieces here
and there, and break 10 other things in the
process.
I think you may be right. I try Broadcom gigE card
with same results. Very slow for amd64 build. With
same hardware, very good results with 4.9/i386,
not too bad with 5.4-pre/i386, and very, very
poor with 5.4-pre/amd64.
Boris
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the point of a list is so that
--- Doug Paquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Group,
I have an HP Proliant DL380 G3 and I am interested
in
teaming or load sharing (what ever its called) my
two
NIC cards that are in my server.
I have been reading about this that I am suppose to
find free bsd drivers to make this work???
--- Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 01:19 schrieb Boris
Spirialitious:
-- Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 00:38 schrieb Boris
Spirialitious:
I have opteron 246 system with 2 port intel em
card. We have test
the
work load on each card so one card isnt doing all
the
work, and with me having two cards i thought i would
see about trying it out.
Doug
--- Boris Spirialitious [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Doug Paquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I have opteron 246 system with 2 port intel em
card. We have test bed with about 200Kbs traffic
and we route through 5.3/i386 system. Load is
about 50%. With same settings, amd64 system run
with 85% load. How could be so slow? What tuning
extra is needed for amd64 kernels?
Boris
-- Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 00:38 schrieb Boris
Spirialitious:
I have opteron 246 system with 2 port intel em
card. We have test bed with about 200Kbs traffic
and we route through 5.3/i386 system. Load is
about 50%. With same settings, amd64
--- Boris Spirialitious [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:50:22AM -0800, Boris
Spirialitious wrote:
When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have
4.9.
is supported? Or 4.11 better? I can't use 5.x.
Well, AMD64
--- Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boris Spirialitious wrote:
--- Boris Spirialitious [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:50:22AM -0800, Boris
Spirialitious wrote:
When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have
--- Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenneth Culver wrote:
Quoting Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Boris Spirialitious wrote:
--- Boris Spirialitious
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:50:22AM -0800,
Boris
--- Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:50:22AM -0800, Boris
Spirialitious wrote:
When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have
4.9.
is supported? Or 4.11 better? I can't use 5.x.
Well, AMD64 support as a tier-1 platform only came
in with 5.x, so
--- Boris Spirialitious [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have 4.9.
is supported? Or 4.11 better? I can't use 5.x.
Will a i386 disk boot on opteron system? Can I
use same disk image for intel and amd MBs? Any
big problems?
Thanks,
Boris
Does anyone
--- Stas Myasnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:43:33 -0800 (PST), Boris
Spirialitious
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ïèñàë(à):
When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have
4.9.
is supported? Or 4.11 better? I can't use 5.x.
AFAIK FreeBSD4 isn't run on amd64 in 64-bit mode
slower version of O/S?
Please don't start with flames. This is what I
feel.
I don't need so much RAM, so 4.x will work with
1 or 2GB of RAM?
Boris
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 09:43 -0800, Boris
Spirialitious wrote:
--- Boris Spirialitious [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When opteron support start
When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have 4.9.
is supported? Or 4.11 better? I can't use 5.x.
Will a i386 disk boot on opteron system? Can I
use same disk image for intel and amd MBs? Any
big problems?
Thanks,
Boris
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Colin Raven vomits:
I have nothing but *stellar* regard for the individuals who take such
immense time and effort to help others on this list. I feel privileged
to belong to this community, and grateful for a huge amount of guidance
advice and help I've received here. I wouldn't have a
What is this subject?
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Hi there
I'm trying to install FreeBSD 5.3 on a dual p3 box:
asus cuv4x-d mobo
adaptec AHA-2940 uw and 29160
I'm using the lastest bios
when I try to boot I get a lot of hexadecimal codes
and the I get BTX HALTED
I dont think there is any hardware problem because
GNU/Linux installs without a
I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
to linux and our application runs so much faster its unbelievable. I report
a small problem and they work hard to fix it. Not like freebsd do they
make fun of me or ask me to give them hardware. Its like a real product
this
Oh, but I do understand! FreeBSD is not good choice for companies
that need support for the latest hardware. Thank you for informing
me.
Boris
Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to thank you for making Freebsd 5.3 so badly. We changed
to linux and our application
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Boris
Spirialitious
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 3:25 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD
None of the new Supermicro hardware I've
None of the new Supermicro hardware I've tried works with Freebsd 4.10
properly. I've seen that this has been reported by others. They are all based
on the 7520 and 7530 Intel chips. 5.3 works ok, but a 3.4/800 processor on 5.3
is slower than a 3.06/533 processor on our old 7502 chipset based
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:16:10PM
-0800, Boris Spirialitious wrote:
inetd[xxx]: unknown rpc/udp6 rpc/tcp6
Any modification of GENERIC from 5.3 seems to have the
problem. I have another config that I ported from 4.x that
works fine (with lots
When I build some custom kernels, inetd is refusing to run
with the error:
inetd[xxx]: unknown rpc/udp6 rpc/tcp6
Any modification of GENERIC from 5.3 seems to have the
problem. I have another config that I ported from 4.x that
works fine (with lots of stuff turned off). It must be some
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:18:34PM
-0800, Boris Spirialitious wrote:
When I build some custom kernels, inetd is refusing to run
with the error:
inetd[xxx]: unknown rpc/udp6 rpc/tcp6
Any modification of GENERIC from 5.3 seems to have the
problem
27 matches
Mail list logo
