Perhaps it isn't logical, if you've read all the email then the quoted
thread is just reference anyway. This is the new stuff. I love being able
to read mail in the preview-pane vs next message , jump to the bottom,
next message jump to the bottom.
It comes down to opinion I think
--Chuck
On
My less than complimentary thought is that they all suck, but that's only
because 99% of the developers who are writing code for *Linux/*BSD don't
really care about the new user experience. They care about whatever it is
they are developing.
Thus the difference between say standard install
Well I finally have KDE3.2 on my system, however to get it there required an
install of 4.9.
The backstory: I was running 4.8 + KDE3.1, wanted to upgrade to KDE3.2.
No amount of portupgrading/rebuilding/package fetching seemed to get me past
KDE 3.1. By the time I was done I had to do a
of that sort of chatter
when you're building KDE in ports for example)
It offends my sense of style but as most people cheerfully point out, its
harmless.
--Chuck
On Thursday 04 March 2004 17:08, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:40:16PM -0800, Charles McManis wrote
Ok, so this is now officially weird. I decided to try to compile khello.cc
from the KDE tutorial on my 4.8 system that has never had me attempt to
upgrade KDE on it.
When I compile khello.cc, it compiles fine, when I link it I get this:
The protections are wrong on the mail directory. Qmail is very picky about
those. I believe they have to be 600 or 644. See the install docs for
details.
Alternatively the Maildir might not exist, what is in the .qmail file of that
user?
--Chuck
On Monday 01 March 2004 11:58, Brian Henning
FFS is fine, until you crash.
Generally a FreeBSD machine with FFS and Softdeps can keep up, the challenge
comes when you have to fsck everything to get back from a crash. That is why
things like LFS et alia are useful. For things like mail directories the
problem can be partitioned into
