> On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 11:20:23AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: > > Seems like a lot of trouble just to maintain "bragging rights" about > > uptime, only to have a "hobbled" system that is not really up to date. > > That's not quite "up" IMHO. > [...] > > For some people these things are important. I have no problem with > shutting down my machine every night. (Of course it's because it's in > my (small) bedroom, and I want to get some sleep. :> )
Here's a fix for the "problem" for those people. Are we done kicking this yet? --- kern_clock.c Fri Oct 18 21:19:06 2002 +++ /tmp/kern_clock.c Sat Jan 4 15:05:53 2003 @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ time_t time_second; struct timeval boottime; -SYSCTL_STRUCT(_kern, KERN_BOOTTIME, boottime, CTLFLAG_RD, +SYSCTL_STRUCT(_kern, KERN_BOOTTIME, boottime, CTLFLAG_RW, &boottime, timeval, "System boottime"); /* To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message