identd and pf question

2005-08-23 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
telnet to one of my IPs on 113 and do an ident request, it responds! Any help is greatly appreciated! -- Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions

Re: pf block question

2005-06-18 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
connections. However, if an IP is connected currently, pf lets that connection continue; even after flushing the states and sources. It doesn't seem to care about ICMP. I can ping it from the box running pf, and receive replies. Am I just missing something obvious here? -- Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL

Re: pf block question

2005-06-09 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
attacker.host.com: icmp 64: echo request seq 0 03:17:04.823353 IP attacker.host.com my.host.com: icmp 64: echo reply seq 0 03:17:05.801745 IP my.host.com attacker.host.com: icmp 64: echo request seq 1 03:17:05.832149 IP attacker.host.com my.host.com: icmp 64: echo reply seq 1 Thanks, -- Matt

Re: pf block question

2005-06-09 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
the traffic still isn't dropped. -- Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

pf block question

2005-06-07 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
. I guess I'm a bit confused as to why it isn't being dropped. Since it has the quick keyword, shouldn't that take precedence over all other filter rules? Any ideas? -- Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: pf block question

2005-06-07 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:12:43AM -0500, John Brooks wrote: Are you sure the ruleset is loaded, and pf is enabled? -- John Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, pfctl -sr yields the rule right under scrub in all. -- Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED

MRTG, and FreeBSD rl0 aliases

2005-03-27 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
This little problem has been bothering me for sometime. I'm trying to do a MRTG setup on my 5.3 system. The ISP I colocate with has allocated me a /29 in public space. Let's say for e-mail purposes, I've been given 192.168.0.29/29. Here are two entries from my mrtg.cfg:

Postfix partial status error in syslog

2005-03-21 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
a cleanup and so forth. Mail doesn't seem to be affected on my system, so I wonder if this is just some kind of debug warning (possibly)? Thanks, -- Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http

qpopper-4.0.5_2 SSL woes

2005-03-20 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
Recently, I've been trying to get SSL support setup on my 5.3 machine's qpopper. I've installed the port with the following options: WITHOUT_APOP=yes WITHOUT_SSL=no WITH_STANDALONE_MODE=no I've generated a SSL certificate file for qpopper's use. It doesn't seem to complain about the

Re: Ack, the mysql41-server port killed my box

2005-02-21 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 01:33:50PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote: Just a wild guess, perhaps there is any pam module which tries to authenticate against the mysql database?. It sounds like -Harry Actually after much effort I figured it out. The mysql41-server port (v 4.1.10), set the

Ack, the mysql41-server port killed my box

2005-02-19 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
! Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 88, Issue 68

2005-02-19 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
Any help is GREATLY appreciated, Google has so far yieled nothing on this topic. Thanks! Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] A bit more detail: Normal users can no longer login, they receive: No supported authentication methods left to try! I can still login with root and toor. I've tried

Re: Dumb question about ports/packages

2005-02-10 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
is out of date? Or is just wise to leave the base alone and upgrade when a new release comes along. Many thanks, -- Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions

Dumb question about ports/packages

2005-02-08 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
that? Or multiple ones for that matter. Can you use the ports/packages system? Or do you have to do an entire system upgrade (i.e. 4.10 to 4.11). Any help is greatly appreciated! Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http

FreeBSD 5.3, Openfiles Limit in login.conf not respected

2005-02-01 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
appreciated! Thanks, -- Matt Rechkemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FreeBSD 5.3, Openfiles Limit in login.conf not respected

2005-02-01 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:17:37PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: It works for me; maybe you forgot to run cap_mkdb(1)? What configuration file should I execute this on? login.conf? Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: FreeBSD 5.3, Openfiles Limit in login.conf not respected

2005-02-01 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 05:01:53PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: What configuration file should I execute this on? login.conf? Yes. Go back to /etc/login.conf and read the first few lines. Lowell, I can't thank you enough :-). I should have RTFP in the first place. Now another question