much exactly the UFS NeXT used on their workstations.
If so, Will such a filesystem be safe to mount under OS X after I use it
on FreeBSD?
I seem to be able to mount these under NetBSD though the snapshot code
complains that inodes 64 and 16384 are not dedicated to snapshots.
--
Thor Lancelot
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 11:00:21PM -0400, nawcom wrote:
i usually use the ufstype=openstep for darwin ufs filesystems, they seem
to work just fine.
That's a Linux mount option, isn't it? I was asking about FreeBSD.
Thor
___
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:23:06AM -0400, Dale Rahn wrote:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:18:55PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 6/11/06, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* IIRC NetBSD was a fork of FreeBSD
that's an interesting theory when you consider that the first netbsd
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:27:33PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
What was the bit size of the CPU's originally used to write UNIX in Bell
Labs?
Rather large. You can get all the details at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_core.
--
Thor Lancelot Simon
