-- Forwarded message --
From: Victor Lyapunov fullblastst...@gmail.com
Date: 2010/12/15
Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors?
To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hi folks,
Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about
possible
of backdoors have been introduced into the
code.
As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code
ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code
ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact
of this?
Thanks,
Victor Lyapunov
Hi everybody,
Sorry for asking dumb questions, but is there any chance zfs becoming
default FS in FreeBSD? If so, how soon might this happen?
Cheers,
Victor.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi everybody,
First of all, I would like to congratulate all of you and thank all
the developers and contributors, and the core team as the widely
expected 8.0-RELEASE has become available recently.
I wanted to ask a simple question, is ZFS now ready to be used on
production systems?
Best regards,
Hi all,
I have production network with FreeBSD box acting as firewall. The
problem emerge as soon as users send mail with attachments. (Sending
mail without attachments always succeeds). Basically, when a user
tries to send a message, only part of it transmitted before connection
is interrupted
This kind of thing is often due to a mtu blackhole - when a larger
email causes a full size IP packet to be sent. I don't see why PF
should make a difference though, IFAIK it's supposed to let ICMP through
when it's learned state on a tcp connection.
Thanks for your answer.
Don't know whether
