Re: [RESOLVED} Xvnc + inetd

2005-06-26 Thread duckeo
On 6/27/05, duckeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >The guide I've been roughly following is at > > >http://oxo.rucus.net/docs/Terminal-Vnc-HOWTO, to give you an idea of > > >what I was aiming for. > > > > KDM is definately listening, UDP

Re: Xvnc + inetd

2005-06-26 Thread duckeo
> Ok then. "What sort of DE/WM setup do you plan on having for your > clients?" is a question you need to ask yourself. Purely KDE for the moment, desktop wise it would be the same for each user. > Essentially if it's a small number of users and you want to let them > setup their own X flavor, yo

Re: Xvnc + inetd

2005-06-26 Thread duckeo
On 6/26/05, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > duckeo wrote: > > >On 6/26/05, duckeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Because isn't VNC far more efficient? I've read X is only really > >>useful locally, also because VN

Re: Xvnc + inetd

2005-06-26 Thread duckeo
Sorry wrong target. Forwarding to the list. On 6/26/05, duckeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because isn't VNC far more efficient? I've read X is only really > useful locally, also because VNC is more common a client on Windows > machines (as in already installed). >