I downloaded ports.tar.gz August 26, 2004 and am currently
building KDE3. I did not run into an error with that particular
file, however the graphics/ImageMagick Makefile and distinfo
file defined 6.0.5.3 as the version it wanted to download.
There is no such version at ImageMagick.org and the
I'm using the SONY DRU500 IDE drive (current model is DRU700) and
have had no problems with it. It's the only one I have so I can't compare
it against anything else.
On Saturday 28 August 2004 09:25 am, Robert Huff wrote:
One of my (SCSI) CD-ROM drives is dieing; to replace it, I was
As others have eluded to, FreeBSD does not provide a windows based user
interface after an installation. The graphics you do eventually setup on the
system will be based upon X windows (see www.xfree86.org). Unlike Microsoft,
there are numerous options for graphical windows interfaces that
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 09:28 am, Charles Ulrich wrote:
epilogue said:
Just out of curiosity, is it incorrect to simply say that ports build
packages?
Yes.
Well, now I've received one explicit yes answer and one explicit no
answer to this question, leading me to believe that there
You could try using the ed editor which should be located on the root
partition for just this reason. Or, manually mount the usr partition when
you get to the shell prompt so you have access to other editors such as vi.
Hopefully you know what partition the usr file system is on (ie da0s1e)
Try this. Get to the shell prompt and run:
ed /etc/fstab
1,$s/ad0/da0/
w
q
Then reboot the system.
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 12:53 pm, DA Forsyth wrote:
Hiya all
I'm searching the web for answers on this too, but so far nothing
useful. hard to know what question to ask the search
Yes.
On Sunday 22 August 2004 01:28 am, FreeBSD Daemon wrote:
Dear list
I bought a 3ware 7500-4LP controller and 4x 200GB IDE disks to go with
it.
Now installing FreeBSD 4.10 I get a warring that the disk geometry
(72963cyls/255heads/63sectrors) is wrong.
Can I ignore this warning safely?
I'd suggest using port forwarding with NATD instead since I'm assuming you are
already running NAT between 192.168.1.1 and your ADSL public address. The
natd man page covers port and address forwarding pretty well.
On Sunday 22 August 2004 10:02 am, Henk wrote:
Dear FreeBSD addict,
I am
On Sunday 08 August 2004 04:38 pm, JJB wrote:
A new rewrite of the FreeBSD handbook firewall section is currently
being made ready for update to the handbook. You can get an
in-process copy from www.a1poweruser.com/FBSD_firewall/
The firewall rewrite only deals with a single public nic and a
de0 = 1.2.3.4 (make up any valid public ip) (mydomain.com)
de1 = 192.168.1.1
de2 = 192.168.2.1
When 192.168.1.247 requests a web page from MYDOMAIN.COM
the request needs to be forwarded to 192.168.2.250:80
In the ruleset below, 15100 is required for this to work. If I pull out
15100 I get no
Given your current network configuration as I understand it, there's no reason
for running NAT on your FBSD box so don't even go there.
Is your router blocking http either inbound or outbound (port 80) ?
Why aren't you using dhclient to get the ip address for all your computers
dynamically
I had a similar, but different problem with 4.7 which impacted all network
traffic but was most noticible using Konqueror. I was getting similar pauses
regardless of the application I ran. Unless you are running BIND and
attempting to get at zones that you adminster, I don't think this is a
12 matches
Mail list logo
