Re: regex question....

2010-12-04 Thread xSAPPYx
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 17:56, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Joshua Gimer jgi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: I have tried :1,$/s/[0-9]][0-9][0-9]/foo/g Why not just %s/[0-9]*/foo/g Too broad -- it will match the null string.  (* means

Re: ssh authentication error

2010-11-12 Thread xSAPPYx
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:06, Jerrin slackma...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,  On a mac system i generated the key using ssh-keygen -t dsa and copied .ssh/id_dsa.pub to /home/user/.ssh/authorized_keys on a Freebsd server, but it prompts for the password Check perms on /home/user/.ssh/authorized_keys

Re: mounting UFS CD-ROMs

2010-08-04 Thread xSAPPYx
You could try the conv=swab option to dd dd if=/dev/acd0 of=5853-5864.iso conv=swab On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 18:04, Noah Pratt npr...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote: Noah Pratt wrote: Hi, I have a whole bunch of UFS CD-ROMs, but

Re: FreeBSD's UFS vs Ext4

2010-02-11 Thread xSAPPYx
Using a phoronix link as an example, ext4 still has some pretty bad data loss bugs: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=Nzk0OA imo: data security of ufs speed of ext4 ymmv ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: I am not understanding something about pf

2009-12-11 Thread xSAPPYx
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote: I am running 7.2-Stable with pf. I have the following pf.conf: no rdr inet proto tcp from spamd-white-local to any port smtp no rdr inet proto tcp from spamd-white to any port smtp rdr pass inet proto tcp from any to any

Re: DNS Question

2009-10-23 Thread xSAPPYx
Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail on all these domains, use A records On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sean Cavanaugh millenia2...@hotmail.com wrote: how is this illegal? CNAME rule: a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records. for the node

Re: problem on pf @ freebsd 7.0

2008-05-14 Thread xSAPPYx
Take a look in /etc/defaults/rc.conf The bits for PF are already there. All you should need is to set pf_enable=YES A quick guess would be that that /etc/defaults/rc.conf is loaded after /etc/rc.conf, and pf_enable is reset to NO, but that is just a guess. Here is my pf section from

Re: coretemp 70C = CPU too hot?

2008-05-09 Thread xSAPPYx
Also something to keep in mind, most (all?) new procs have thermal cuttoffs that will kill themselves before any damage happens. If you box hasn't shut down in weird ways or underclocked itself, you are probably good to go. It's something to keep your eye on, but I wouldn't worry too much about it