David Robillard wrote:
>> Thanks for looking into this. I just realised that the domain in
>> question got fixed overnight after notifying the sysadmin. I guess this
>> is a good thing, yet I'm left puzzled with the difference between
>> confBIND_OPTS option and compiled INET6 support.
>
> Hello M
Dan Busarow wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 19, 2006, at 01:09 AM, Mikhail Goriachev wrote:
>
>> Doug Hardie wrote:
>>> That option has worked quite well for me. However, there may be
>>> something unusual with the DNS for that domain. You will probably
>>> need to provide some specifics on the dom
Thanks for looking into this. I just realised that the domain in
question got fixed overnight after notifying the sysadmin. I guess this
is a good thing, yet I'm left puzzled with the difference between
confBIND_OPTS option and compiled INET6 support.
Hello Mikhail,
The difference is rather sim
On Wednesday, July 19, 2006, at 01:09 AM, Mikhail Goriachev wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
That option has worked quite well for me. However, there may be
something unusual with the DNS for that domain. You will probably
need to provide some specifics on the domain so we can see what DNS
is ret
Doug Hardie wrote:
>
> That option has worked quite well for me. However, there may be
> something unusual with the DNS for that domain. You will probably
> need to provide some specifics on the domain so we can see what DNS
> is returning.
>
Thanks for looking into this. I just realise
Hi everyone,
I found a problem and its solution. Now I'd like someone to help me
understand a few things please.
My stock sendmail cannot send emails to a certain domain due to broken
DNS () responses. All correspondence gets queued with a:
(Deferred: Name server: .: host name lookup failure
