Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:30:28 -0400
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough, but is it necessary on all the lists for freebsd?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
That is one man's point of
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:25:54 -0400
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:30:28 -0400
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough, but is it necessary on all the lists for freebsd?
Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough, but is it necessary on all the lists for freebsd?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:30:28 -0400
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough, but is it necessary on all the lists for freebsd?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
That is one man's point of view. There are several others though.
--
---BeginMessage---
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 23:24 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Da Rock writes:
Because many people who ask questions here are not subscribed to the
list and thus would not see any answers that were sent only to the list.
Well that certainly explains it, but it does
