Hello,
Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
software. The SANS Institute @Risk newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains
the following item regarding PuTTY:
04.31.4 CVE: Not Available
Platform: Third
stheg olloydson wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
software. The SANS Institute @Risk newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains
the following item regarding PuTTY:
04.31.4 CVE: Not
On Monday 16 August 2004 03:52 pm, stheg olloydson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
software.
It is written for *nix and win32, and it has an MIT license.
it was said:
I think what you are saying is that if you use PuTTY as a client
application that you should be concerned about what server you
connect to? From what you are saying, I suspect that if the only
use is to connect to your own (FreeBSD) server, you are probably ok?
Jay O'Brien
