Re: [ports] why no libXXX after make install of libXXX?

2012-05-28 Thread Bernt Hansson
2012-05-27 01:17, Gary Aitken skrev: On 05/26/12 14:03, Gary Aitken wrote: I'm trying to install audacious, which depends on libmowgli. The port fails to build because of a missing library. Shouldn't the build of a library result in the library being placed in /usr/local/lib? I notice that /v

Re: [ports] why no libXXX after make install of libXXX?

2012-05-27 Thread ill...@gmail.com
On 26 May 2012 19:17, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 05/26/12 14:03, Gary Aitken wrote: >> I'm trying to install audacious, which depends on libmowgli. >> The port fails to build because of a missing library. >> Shouldn't the build of a library result in the library being placed in >> /usr/local/lib? >

Re: [ports] why no libXXX after make install of libXXX?

2012-05-26 Thread Gary Aitken
On 05/26/12 14:03, Gary Aitken wrote: > I'm trying to install audacious, which depends on libmowgli. > The port fails to build because of a missing library. > Shouldn't the build of a library result in the library being placed in > /usr/local/lib? I notice that /var/db/pkg/libmowgli-1.0.0/+CONTEN

[ports] why no libXXX after make install of libXXX?

2012-05-26 Thread Gary Aitken
I'm trying to install audacious, which depends on libmowgli. The port fails to build because of a missing library. Shouldn't the build of a library result in the library being placed in /usr/local/lib? cd multimedia/audacious make -v install results in: ... ===> libmcs-0.7.2_1 depends